Skip to content

Intra-patient Study With Polymer Free Drug Eluting Stent Versus Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent With Early OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) Follow up

Intra-patient Randomized Study With Polymer Free Drug Eluting Stent Versus Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent With Early OCT Follow up

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02785237
Enrollment
70
Registered
2016-05-27
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2019-01-01
Last updated
2019-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Drug-eluting stent, OCT, Re-endothelialization

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the process of early re-endothelialization of the Coroflex® ISAR Drug-eluting stent compared with the Ultimaster® Drug-eluting stent

Detailed description

The objective of the study is to evaluate the process of early re-endothelialization of the Coroflex® ISAR Drug-eluting stent compared with the Ultimaster® Drug-eluting stent

Interventions

DEVICECoroflex® ISAR Drug-eluting stent

Coroflex® ISAR Drug-eluting stent and an Ultimaster® Drug-eluting stent in the second lesion.

DEVICEUltimaster® Drug-eluting stent

Ultimaster® Drug-eluting stent and a Coroflex® ISAR Drug-eluting stent in the second lesion.

Sponsors

B.Braun Surgical SA
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged ≥ 18 years * Signature of informed consent * Patients with angina and a clinical indication for coronary revascularisation with a drug-eluting stent * Presence of at least 2 lesions to be revascularised with similar angiographic characteristics * Reference lesion diameter with at most a difference of 0.5 mm * Maximum difference in lesion length of 10 mm * Lesions able to be treated with only 1 stent

Exclusion criteria

* Lesions due to restenosis * Lesions in saphenous vein grafts * STE-ACS ( ST elevation- Acute Coronary Syndrome) * Cardiogenic shock * Dual antiplatelet therapy contraindication for\> 3 months * Follow-up catheterisation contraindicated * Chronic kidney failure with creatinine \> 2 mg/dL * Allergy to iodinated contrast agents * Serious complication from vascular access in previous catheterisation * Ineligible for evaluation via optical coherence tomography * Lesion located \<5 mm from aorto-ostial junction * Severe proximal angulation \>90º * Bifurcation lesion requiring a strategy with two stents * Angiographic characteristics that promote stent malposition * Aneurysm or coronary artery ectasia * Presence of a thrombus classed as TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction )2 flow or higher * Severe calcification, in particular in cases of calcium spike * Severe lesion angulation * Inability to do reliable follow-up, in the investigator's opinion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of stents with ≥3% of uncovered struts at 3 months OCT after stent implantation.3 months
Percentage of early coating on the struts of the Coroflex® ISAR Drug-eluting stent versus Ultimaster® - Drug eluting stent at 3 months OCT after stent implantation.3 months
Percentage of covered struts at 3 months OCT after stent implantation.3 months
Percentage of uncovered struts ≥3% at 3 months OCT after stent implantation.3 months
Number of transversal sections with a percentage (rate of uncovered struts/ total number of struts) > 30 % at 3 months OCT after stent implantation.3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of stent malapposition at 1 month and 3 months OCT after stent implantation.1 month and 2 months and 3 months
Percentage of struts malapposition at 1 month and 3 months OCT after stent implantation.1 month and 2 months and 3 months
Percentage of covered struts, at 1 month, 2 months and 3 months OCT after stent implantation.1 month and 2 months and 3 months
Percentage of stents with any malapposition strut > 260 µm at 1 month and 3 months OCT after stent implantation.1 month and 2 months and 3 months
Healing Score at 1 month and 3 months OCT after stent implantation .1 month and 2 months and 3 months
Percentage of struts malapposition> 260 µm at 1 month and 3 months OCT after stent implantation.1 month and 2 months and 3 months
Total Tissue coverage at 1month, 2 months and 3 months OCT after stent implantation.1 month and 2 months and 3 months
Mean thickness of struts tissue coverage at 1 month, 2 months and 3 months OCT after stent implantation.1 month and 2 months and 3 months
MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Events) at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.30 days and 3 months and 6 months and 12 months
Target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months OCT after stent implantation .30 days and 3 months and 6 months and 12 months

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026