Skip to content

Education and Social Media Versus Non-Indicated Caesarean Section Rate in Egypt

Education and Social Media Versus Non-Indicated Caesarean Section Rate in Egypt

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02785094
Enrollment
1400
Registered
2016-05-27
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2016-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complications; Cesarean Section

Keywords

Caesarean Section Rate, Primigravida

Brief summary

This study focus on measuring effect of Egyptian Primigravidas' education level and accessibility to social media on rate of maternal request option offered for non-indicated primary caesarean section.

Detailed description

A caesarean section (CS) is a life-saving surgical procedure when certain complications arise during pregnancy and labour. However, it is a major surgery and is associated with immediate maternal and perinatal risks and may have implications for future pregnancies as well as long-term effects that are still being investigated. The use of CS has increased dramatically worldwide in the last decades particularly in middle- and high-income countries, and some studies showing a link between increasing CS rates and poorer outcomes, and reasons for this increase are multifactorial and not well-understood. In Egypt the CS rate according to WHO (World Health Organization),Health report (2010) is 27.6 %. Egypt also is considered to be the highest African country in CS rate (51.8 %), in which CS rate rose from 4.6 % to 51.8 % over the 24 year period (1990-2014), and more than half of all women give birth by CS in Egypt without much difference between urban and rural areas. Slightly more than half of the live births in the five-year period before 2014 Egypt Demographic and Health survey were by CS, and 60 % of primigravidas delivered by CS. Updated indications of primary CS including option of maternal request as one of these indications were reported in both RCOG (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists) Press report (2001) and RCOG CS various guidelines. Recently, the Egyptian public opinion deviated to obstetricians' desire for self financial benefits to be the major cause of increasing Egypt CS rates; depending on newspaper articles and social media talks.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALObservation

Observation of Participants' behaviour

Sponsors

Talkha Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Full term with gestational age (G.A) more than or equal 39 weeks. * Acceptance to answer study short questionnaire to determine eligible participants for each cohort.

Exclusion criteria

* Multiparity. * History of previous Caesarean Section/s. * Any Mental or Physical disabilities. * Disapproval for answering a predefined short questionnaire related to study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Primigravidas who request a Non-Indicated CSUp to 2 weeksNumber of Primigravidas who request a Non-Indicated CS.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Primigravidas who refused to have a trial of IOL (Induction of Labour), as an index for deviated intention to request a Non-Indicated CSUp to 24 hoursNumber of Primigravidas who refused to have a trial of IOL (Induction of Labour), as an index for deviated intention to request a Non-Indicated CS.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026