Skip to content

Study of Busulfan and FLAG Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Safety and Efficacy Study of Busulfan/FLAG Conditioning Regimen in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02784561
Enrollment
80
Registered
2016-05-27
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2020-07-31
Last updated
2016-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia

Keywords

allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, conditioning regimen, acute leukemia, relapsed/refractory

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Busulfan/FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) Conditioning Regimen in Patients with Relapsed/refractory Acute Leukemia undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Detailed description

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the only way to cure relapsed/refractory acute leukemia. Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (BuCy, Cytarabine, Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide) has been a classical conditioning regimen for allo-SCT. Substitution of Cyclophosphamide in the BuCy regimen with Fludarabine (BuF) resulted in reduced toxicity and similar efficacy. FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) is a chemotherapy regimen that has been proved to be effective for relapsed/refractory acute leukemia as salvage therapy. To reduce the relapse and improve the survival of those patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia who receive allo-SCT, the novel conditioning regimen consisting of Busulfan/FLAG was developed. The combination of Bu and FLAG without interval shortens the duration of conditioning and the pneutropenic period of the patient compared with successive administration of FLAG followed with BuF. In addition, regarding the established safety and efficacy of BuF and FLAG, it is reasonable to expect similar safety and enhanced antileukemic efficacy for Bu/FLAG compared with BuF. In this study, the safety and efficacy of this regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation was investigated.

Interventions

DRUGBusulfan (Zhejiang Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd)

busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day intravenously \[i.v.\], days -10 to -8)

DRUGCytarabine(Actavis Italy S.p.A)

cytarabine (1.6 g/m2/day, days -7 to -3)

DRUGFludarabine (Bayer)

fludarabine (30 mg/m2, day -7 to -3),

DRUGgranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (KirinKunpeng)

granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 ug/kg, day -8 to granulocyte recovery)

DRUGrabbit ATG(Sanofi/Genzyme)

ATG; thymoglobuline, rabbit;2.5 mg/kg/day, days -5 to -2

Sponsors

309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Naval General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Space Center Hospital, Peking University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* relapsed/refractory acute leukemia regardless of cytogenetics * All patients should aged 12 to 65 years * Have matched sibling donors, ≥8/10 HLA(human leukocyte antigen) matched unrelated donors or haploidentical donors * Patients without any uncontrolled infections or without severe pulmonary, renal, hepatic or cardiac diseases

Exclusion criteria

* Patients aged less than 12 years old * Patients with any uncontrolled infections or with severe pulmonary, renal, hepatic or cardiac diseases * Acute myeloid leukemia patients with t (15;17)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of participants relapse as assessed by NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network )criteriatwo years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of Complete Remission as assessed by NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network )criteria30 days
DFS(disease-free survival )two years
TRM(treatment-related mortality )two years
Number of participants with aGVHD as assessed by acute graft versus host disease grading criteria (refer to Glucksberg criteria)three months
Number of participants with Regimen-related adverse events as assessed by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0330 days

Contacts

Primary ContactDaihong Liu, Doctor
daihongrm@163.com86-13681171597
Backup ContactLiping Dou, Doctor
lipingruirui@163.com86-13681207138

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026