Skip to content

Norepinephrine Transporter Blockade, Autonomic Failure (NETAF)

Phase 2 Norepinephrine Transporter Blockade, Autonomic Failure IND117394 12/28/12

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02784535
Acronym
NETAF
Enrollment
48
Registered
2016-05-27
Start date
2016-08-29
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2023-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

Keywords

norepinephrine transporter inhibitors

Brief summary

Drug therapy for patients suffering from autonomic failure and neurogenic orthostatic hypotension are scarce and not effective. If left untreated, these patients have the highest risk of syncope, falls and fall-related injuries. The proposed study will determine the clinical benefit of a commercially available drug, atomoxetine, to reduce symptoms associated with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in patients with autonomic failure.

Detailed description

Autonomic failure is a group of rare neurodegenerative disorders that primarily affect the autonomic nervous system. These patients develop neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (OH) because of impaired autonomic reflexes that control cardiovascular and neuro-humoral adaptation to upright posture. The treatment of neurogenic OH is challenging; the therapeutic options are scarce, and some patients are refractory to treatment. Atomoxetine is a selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor that increases the availability of norepinephrine in the synapse by blocking its reuptake. Our preliminary data in sixty-five patients with primary autonomic failure and neurogenic OH showed that atomoxetine was more effective than midodrine, standard of care, in improving standing SBP (+7.5 mm Hg). Notably, only atomoxetine and not midodrine induced a significant reduction in OH-related symptoms (lightheadedness and dizziness) compared with placebo. In this proposal, we will test the hypothesis that prolonged administration of the norepinephrine transporter blocker, atomoxetine, improves OH-related symptoms and OH-impact on daily activities compared with placebo in autonomic failure patients. We propose a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2x2 crossover study.

Interventions

DRUGAtomoxetine

norepinephrine transporter inhibitor

DRUGPlacebo

placebo

Sponsors

NYU Langone Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 40 years old or older * Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension (defined by a reduction of ≥20 mmHg drop in SBP within 3 minutes of standing, associated with impaired autonomic reflexes as assessed by autonomic function tests.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Hypersensitivity to atomoxetine (severe allergic reaction, rash, urticaria, anaphylaxis) * Use of other norepinephrine transporter inhibitors such as Wellbutrin (Bupropion), Cymbalta (Duloxetine), Effexor (venlafaxine), Pristiq (desvenlafaxine), Savella (milnacipran) * Previous history (within 14 days prior to enrollment) and current use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors * Concomitant use of strong CYP2D6 inhibitors such as delavirdine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, quinidine * Pre-existing sustained severe hypertension (BP ≥ 140/80 mmhg in the sitting position) * Impaired hepatic function (aspartate amino transaminase \[AST\] and/or alanine amino transaminase \[ALT\] \>2 x upper limit of normal range) * Impaired renal function (serum creatinine equal or more than 1.6 mg/dl) * Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment * Congestive heart failure (LV hypertrophy acceptable) * History of serious neurologic disease such as cerebral hemorrhage, or stroke * Inability to comply with the protocol, e.g., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, unlikelihood of completing the study, and mental conditions rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study * Narrow-angle glaucoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the OHQ (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire) Composite Scoreweek 0 to week 4The Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ) , patient-reported assessment tool consisting of the OH Symptom Assessment (OHSA), OH Daily Activity Scale (OHDAS). The composite score is composed of 10 individual items: 6 items measure specific symptoms , the Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment (OHSA), and 4 items measure the impact of those symptoms on a patient daily activities, the Orthostatic Hypotension Daily Activity Scale (OHDAS). This scales helps to measure the impact of orthostatic symptoms on daily. Scale is between 0-10: where 0 is minimum Orthostatic symptoms and 10 is the maximum / worse possible severity of the symptoms. All items are scored 0 through 10 (higher scores = more impact) and summed into the respective total scores. The OHSA and OHDAS subscales averaged to compute the OHQ composite score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Blood PressureBaseline to 4 weeksSystolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) (measured in mm of Hg) , is recorded after 10 mins of standing. The changes SBP and DBP are compared from baseline, post drug (4 weeks)
Change in Heart Rate (HR)Baseline and at 4 weeksHR is compared to baseline after 10 mins of standing. The difference increase in Heart rate from baseline, post drug at 4 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

25 subjects completed study at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville 15 subjects were enrolled at NYU School of Medicine,Langone Medical Center.NY

Pre-assignment details

68 patients were screened, 20 subjects met exclusion criteria. 48 enrolled in the open-label, dose-optimization phase to identify Atomoxetine responders for eligibility to be randomized. 8 participants did not meet the response eligibility criteria, (Blood pressure too high (4), no response to drug (4) 40 patients randomized in the double-blind, placebo-controlled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants were randomized to receive all interventions. All participants received Atomoxetine and All participants received Placebo. Participants were randomized, double blinded, In Phase I (0-4 weeks), Day 0-Day 28, Day 0 is baseline: 50 % of participants got Atomoxetine (active drug) 50 % of participants got Placebo In Phase II Day 36 to Day 64. Participants were washed out of Phase I Participants who received Atomoxetine at phase 1, got Placebo in Phase II Participants who received Placebo at Phase 1, got Atomoxetine in Phase II
40
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
BMI (Body Mass Index)26.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
Diagnosis 2
Multiple System Atrophy (MSA)
18 Participants
Diagnosis 2
Non MSA (Parkinson disease or Pure autonomic failure
22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Height174.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants
To identify Atomoxetine Responders
High Concentration responders -Atomoxetine 18mg
10 Participants
To identify Atomoxetine Responders
Low Concentration responders with Atomoxetine 10mg
30 Participants
Weight80 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480 / 401 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 4813 / 4013 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 481 / 402 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the OHQ (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire) Composite Score

The Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ) , patient-reported assessment tool consisting of the OH Symptom Assessment (OHSA), OH Daily Activity Scale (OHDAS). The composite score is composed of 10 individual items: 6 items measure specific symptoms , the Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment (OHSA), and 4 items measure the impact of those symptoms on a patient daily activities, the Orthostatic Hypotension Daily Activity Scale (OHDAS). This scales helps to measure the impact of orthostatic symptoms on daily. Scale is between 0-10: where 0 is minimum Orthostatic symptoms and 10 is the maximum / worse possible severity of the symptoms. All items are scored 0 through 10 (higher scores = more impact) and summed into the respective total scores. The OHSA and OHDAS subscales averaged to compute the OHQ composite score.

Time frame: week 0 to week 4

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in the OHQ (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire) Composite ScoreOHQ composite score at 4weeks3.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
PlaceboChange in the OHQ (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire) Composite ScoreDifference in OHQ composite score at 4 weeks-0.58 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
PlaceboChange in the OHQ (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire) Composite ScoreOHQ composite score at Baseline4.61 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
AtomoxetinChange in the OHQ (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire) Composite ScoreOHQ composite score at Baseline4.17 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
AtomoxetinChange in the OHQ (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire) Composite ScoreOHQ composite score at 4weeks3.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
AtomoxetinChange in the OHQ (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire) Composite ScoreDifference in OHQ composite score at 4 weeks-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Secondary

Change in Blood Pressure

Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) (measured in mm of Hg) , is recorded after 10 mins of standing. The changes SBP and DBP are compared from baseline, post drug (4 weeks)

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Blood Pressuredifference increase in SBP; post drug 4 weeks; standing for 10 mins3.88 mm of HgStandard Deviation 19.83
PlaceboChange in Blood PressureDBP;post drug; standing 10 mins at 4 weeks-3.06 mm of HgStandard Deviation 15.85
AtomoxetinChange in Blood Pressuredifference increase in SBP; post drug 4 weeks; standing for 10 mins-2.44 mm of HgStandard Deviation 23.54
AtomoxetinChange in Blood PressureDBP;post drug; standing 10 mins at 4 weeks-0.94 mm of HgStandard Deviation 15.6
Secondary

Change in Heart Rate (HR)

HR is compared to baseline after 10 mins of standing. The difference increase in Heart rate from baseline, post drug at 4 weeks

Time frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Heart Rate (HR)79.12 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 11.83
AtomoxetinChange in Heart Rate (HR)82.68 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 14.58

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026