Skip to content

Self-apposing Stentys Stents Registry

Safety and Effectiveness of the Self-aPposing, bAlloon-delivered, dRug-eluting Stent for the Treatment of the Coronary Artery Disease: A multiCenter Registry

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02784405
Acronym
SPARTA
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-05-27
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2016-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

percutaneous coronary intervention, stent implantation

Brief summary

Self-apposing, drug-eluting Stentys coronary stents represent a valuable tool for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis. Their ability to adapt to widely varying vessel calibers and to auto-expand after their release to self-appose to vessel walls is particularly useful in the presence of ectasic coronary arteries or significant vessel tapering. The investigators planned this study to assess the feasibility, the effectiveness and the safety of the implantation of self-apposing, drug-eluting Stentys stents for percutaneous coronary intervention. Consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of a self-apposing Stentys stent were enrolled in this multi center registry. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and ability to provide informed consent. No exclusion criteria were defined. Primary end-point of the study is the occurrence of MACE (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned hospitalization for unstable angina, target lesion revascularization). Secondary end-points include individual components of MACE, procedural complications (periprocedural MI, bleedings, access site complication, failure to cross stent struts with guidewire in the treatment of bifurcation, failure to delivery the stent, contrast-induced nephropathy), bleedings at follow up.

Detailed description

Rationale: Choice of the appropriate size of stents in the treatment of coronary artery stenosis can often be challenging. Marked tapering of vessels' diameter in their proximal-distal development may lead to sub-optimal results. Distal under-expansion of the drug-eluting stent (DES) or vessel perforation may occur if a larger DES, best suited for the proximal diameter, is chosen. Proximal DES under-sizing with struts malapposition may happen if a smaller DES, fitting the distal diameter, is implanted. Moreover, ectasic vessels present irregular and varying diameter, which may lead as well to segmental malapposition or under-expansion of DES. Self-apposing stents can overcome these limitations thanks to their ability to self-expand also after their release in the vessel and to adapt to a wide range of vessel diameters. Multiple generation of self-apposing, drug-eluting stents have been developed, with progressive amendments pertaining the stent-deployment technique (from deployment by covering-sheath retraction to balloon-delivery) and the drug released (from paclitaxel to sirolimus). The last generation of the self-apposing stents is represented by the sirolimus-eluting, balloon-delivered Xposition S stents. Studies assessing performance of this stent are however limited in sample size and length of follow up, and are mainly controlled trials. Few data are available regarding the clinical outcomes of the self-apposing Stentys stents in a real-life setting. Aim of this study is to assess the feasibility, the effectiveness and the safety of the implantation of self-apposing, drug-eluting Stentys stents for percutaneous coronary intervention. Study population: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of a self-apposing Stentys stent. Primary analysis: Longitudinal cohort follow up Study end-points: Primary efficacy end-point: * Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (a composite end point including death, myocardial infarction (MI, excluding periprocedural MI), stent thrombosis, unplanned hospitalization for unstable angina, target lesion revascularization (TLR)) Secondary efficacy end-points: * Individual components of MACE (death, MI, stent thrombosis, unplanned hospitalization, TLR) Secondary safety end-points: * Procedural complications: * Periprocedural MI * Bleedings * Access site complication * Failure to cross stent struts with guidewire in the treatment of bifurcation * Failure to delivery the stent * Contrast-induced nephropathy * Bleedings at follow up

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 18 years old * ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)12 monthsA composite end-point of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned hospitalization for unstable angina, target lesion revascularization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial Infarction12 monthsIncident rate of myocardial infarction
Stent thrombosis12 monthsIncident rate of stent thrombosis
Target lesion revascularization12 monthsIncident rate of target lesion revascularization
Death12 months
Procedural and in-hospital complications30 daysIncident rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction, bleedings and access site complication, failure to cross stent struts with guidewire in the treatment of bifurcation, failure to delivery the stent, contrast-induced nephropathy
Bleeding events12 monthsIncident rate of bleedings classified according to the BARC criteria
Unplanned hospitalization for unstable angina12 monthsIncident rate of unplanned hospitalization for unstable angina

Countries

Italy, Malaysia, Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactSebastiano Gili, MD
sebastiano.gili@gmail.com+393338354923
Backup ContactAntonio Montefusco, MD
anto.montefusco@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026