Skip to content

APCext : Effect of Temporary Porto-caval Shunt During Liver Transplantation on Function of Liver Graft From Extended Criteria Donor

APCext : Effect of Temporary Porto-caval Shunt During Liver Transplantation on Function of Liver Graft From Extended Criteria Donor

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02784119
Acronym
APCext
Enrollment
214
Registered
2016-05-26
Start date
2017-03-28
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2024-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Transplantation

Keywords

temporary porto-caval shunt, liver graft, extended criteria donor

Brief summary

The success of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in treatment of liver malignancy and endstage liver disease has led to an increase in the gap between patients on waiting-lists and available liver grafts. In order to compensate for this scarcity, use of liver grafts harvested from extended criteria donors (ECD) has become more and more frequent. However, these ECD grafts are known to be associated with a higher rate of primary non function (PNF) or early allograft dysfunction (EAD) because of a greater vulnerability to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). During OLT, the clamping of the portal vein induces blood congestion in the splanchnic territory leading to increased gut permeability, bacterial translocation and release of endotoxin and pro-inflammatory cytokines at revascularisation, which exacerbate IRI. Realisation of a temporary porto-caval shunt (TPCS) (i.e. end to side anastomosis between the portal vein and infrahepatic vena cava) during the anhepatic phase, avoids splanchnic congestion and could therefore decrease IRI and improve liver graft function. However, TPCS remains poorly used as no randomised trial succeeds to show its benefit on liver function due to lack of power.

Interventions

PROCEDUREtemporary porto-caval shunt

temporary porto-caval shunt

Sponsors

Rennes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years old * Candidate of liver transplantation * With cirrhosis from any etiology * Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score \< 25 * Transplanted with a liver graft harvested from an extended criteria donor defined as presence of at least one of the following criteria: * Donor age \> 65 years old * Intensive care unit stay \> 7 days * BMI \> 30 * Natremia \> 155 mmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) \> 150 IU/mL * Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) \> 170 IU/mL * Occurrence of a cardiac arrest before graft harvesting * Proven biopsy macrosteathosis \> 30% * Non-opposition from the patient Non Inclusion Criteria: * Fulminant hepatitis * Retransplantation * Combined organ transplantation (kidney, pancreas, heart, lung) * Non heart beating donor * Complete portal vein thrombosis on preoperative imaging finding

Exclusion criteria

* Complete portal vein thrombosis found during procedure * Split liver graft * Realisation of a bilio-enteric anastomosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of early allograft dysfunctionon postoperative day 7defined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria: * Bilirubin level \> 10 mg/dL (i.e. 171 µmol/L) * International Normalized Ratio \> 1.6
Incidence of primary non functionwithin the 7 first postoperative daydefined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria: * Graft's death or retransplantation * Patient's death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of surgeryat day 0
Liver graft functionwithin 3 monthsevaluated by the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) score
Occurrence of a severe postoperative complicationwithin 3 monthsdefined as a Clavien-Dindo classification \> 2
Realisation of intra-operative transfusionduring the operationdefined by the transfusion needs of fresh frozen plasma, red blood cell and platelet pool
Graft's survivalat 3 monthsdefined by graft's death or retransplantation
Patient's survivalat 3 monthsdefined by patient's death
Evaluation of urinary functionwithin the first 7 daysdefined by: * Measuring postoperative creatinine level (mg/L) * Need of renal dialysis
Incidence of reperfusion syndromeduring the 5 minutes following revascularisationdefined as decrease of 30% of the median arterial pressure

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactMichel RAYAR, MD, PhD
michel.rayar@chu-rennes.fr02 99 28 42 65
Backup ContactAnne GANIVET
anne.ganivet@chu-rennes.fr02 99 28 25 55

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026