Skip to content

A Comparison of Crystalloid Alone Versus Crystalloid Plus Colloid in Shock Resuscitation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Crystalloid Alone Versus Crystalloid Plus Colloid in Shock Resuscitation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02782819
Enrollment
320
Registered
2016-05-25
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2016-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypotension and Shock

Keywords

Shock resuscitation, colloid, crystalloid

Brief summary

Fluid resuscitation is the most effective treatment of shock. Isotonic crystalloid solution is the current recommended initial fluid resuscitation. However, this kind of fluid has high volume of distribution and may require large volume administration before achieve therapeutic goal of shock reversal. There are rising concern about the delay in shock reversal and adverse consequences of large amount volume of fluid therapy. Colloid fluid have been used as the alternate fluid resuscitation, aiming to limit the volume of fluid resuscitation and promote shock reversal. Whether colloid infusion can improve shock reversal rate and decrease complication associated with fluid resuscitation, had inconclusive information.

Detailed description

Fluid resuscitation is the most effective treatment of shock. Isotonic crystalloid solution is the current recommended initial fluid resuscitation. However, this kind of fluid has high volume of distribution and may require large volume administration before achieve therapeutic goal of shock reversal. There are rising concern about the delay in shock reversal and adverse consequences of large amount volume of fluid therapy. Colloid fluid have been used as the alternate fluid resuscitation, aiming to limit the volume of fluid resuscitation and promote shock reversal. Data from a recent randomized controlled study showed the improve long term survival among shock patients whose resuscitated with colloid solution. There were evidence about the increase incidence of acute kidney injury among critically ill patients who received hydroxyethyl starch, a previously worldwide used colloid solution. For septic shock, the leading cause of shock in current situation, resuscitation with albumin may associated with better outcome, while increasing mortality had been reported among the patient who received hydroxyethyl starch. Whether colloid infusion can improve shock reversal rate and decrease complication associated with fluid resuscitation, had inconclusive information.

Interventions

DRUGIsotonic crystalloid solution resuscitation

Patient will receive normal saline or Ringer lactate or other balance salt solution during fluid resuscitation for shock reversal.

DRUGColloid solution resuscitation

Patient will receive 5% albumin or gelatin solution during shock resuscitation

Sponsors

Siriraj Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age at least 18 years old * New onset of shock within 24 hours * Mean arterial blood pressure less than 65 mmHg or systolic blood pressure less than 60% of patient's baseline blood pressure * Evidence of poor tissue perfusion including: urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr, lactate more than 2 mmol/L, alteration of consciousness without other explanation * Evidence of fluid inadequacy (CVP \< 12 mmHg, Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure \< 18 mmHg) or evidence of fluid responsive (IVC diameter variation \> 15%, pulse pressure variation \> 15%, positive fluid challenge test)

Exclusion criteria

* Prolong shock more than 24 hours * Received colloid solution more than 1,000 mL in previous 72 hours * Do not resuscitation documented patient * Contraindication for fluid therapy including: suspected cardiogenic shock, evidence of pulmonary edema, history of anaphylaxis after fluid therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients who had shock reversal6 hours after initial resuscitationShock reversal was defined by mean arterial blood pressure \> 65 mmHg plus lactate clearance more than 10%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality rate28 daysDead from any causes within 28 days after enrollment
Hospital mortality90 daysDead from any causes during hospital admission
Total fluid resuscitation within 24 hours24 hoursTotal volume of fluid resuscitation the patient received within 24 hours after enrollment
Renal replacement therapy28 daysPatient who required acute renal replacement therapy during admission

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactSurat Tongyoo, MD.
surat_Ty@yahoo.co.uk+6624198534
Backup ContactPrapan Laophannarai, MD.
praphan113@hotmail.com+66914018833

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026