Skip to content

Manual Therapy Techniques on Cervical Spine and Psychological Interaction

Hypoalgesic Effects of Three Different Manual Therapy Techniques on Cervical Spine and Psychological Interaction: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02782585
Enrollment
75
Registered
2016-05-25
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2016-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

neck pain, Manual therapy, psychological interaction

Brief summary

Manual therapy (MT) techniques applied over cervical region have over both local (neck) and distant regions (elbow) in both asymptomatic and symptomatic populations. Neurophysiological mechanisms are hypothesized to explain the underlying effects, with effects originating from peripheral mechanisms, spinal cord and supraspinal mechanisms. There is also an increasing interest in the study of the role of psychological variables in the treatment success in neck pain. Psychological variables, like anxiety catastrophizing or kinesiophobia are related to poor prognosis in the development of pain outcomes and disability in neck pain, being the Fear-Avoidance Model of pain one of the most tested models in this field.

Interventions

The therapist cradled the subject´s head with the other hand. Gentle ipsilateral side flexion and contralateral rotation to the targeted side were introduced until slight tension was perceived in the tissues at the contact point. The High velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) manipulation was directed upward and medially in the direction of the subject´s contralateral eye. The therapist monitored for cavitation or 'popping sound' accompanying the manipulations. If an audible popping sound was not heard during the first manipulative attempt, the procedure was repeated in the second time.

The upper limb of the right side of subjects was maintained in rest, with the arm along the trunk and the hand over the abdominal wall. The right hand of the treating therapist was positioned over scapula region, to depress the scapula while left hand cradled the occiput and neck above C5-C6 and left hand produced a passive lateral movement of the occipital and neck region.

The patients received a passive cervical mobilization that involved a grade III oscillatory unilateral posteroanterior mobilization to the right articular pillar of C5/C6 segment as described Maitland at a frequency of 2Hz. All the subjects were positioned in prone position as the protocol described by Sterling et al. for 3 sets of 2 minutes with 1 minute rest between sets.

Sponsors

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Neck pain

Exclusion criteria

* myelopathy * fracture * infection * dystonia * tumor * inflammatory disease * fibromyalgia * or osteoporosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) at 24 hours24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatmentPPT will be assessed bilaterally over the C7 zygapophyseal joint, epicondyle region, and trapezious muscle by an assessor blinded to the subjects condition.
Change from State-Trait Anxiety Inventory subscale (STAI-E) at 24 hours24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatmentWill be used to measure anxiety status

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Beck depression Inventory (BDI-II)24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatmentWill be used to measure depression status
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatmentWill be used to measure Kinesiophobia status

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026