Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiome Transplantation (FMT) in the Treatment of Antibiotic Dependent Pouchitis (ADP)

Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiome Transplantation (FMT) in the Treatment of Antibiotic Dependent Pouchitis (ADP)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02782325
Enrollment
6
Registered
2016-05-25
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2018-12-03
Last updated
2019-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pouchitis

Brief summary

Antibiotic dependent pouchitis (ADP) is predestined to benefit from FMT, since bacterial dysbiosis, which can only be controlled with antibiotics, appears to be the major driver of the clinical symptoms. This is a proof of concept randomized placebo controlled trial, in which 50% of the patients will receive FMT and 50% will receive a placebo FMT. Additionally the trial offers an open label extension period.

Detailed description

FMT for ADP is a promising approach, given the documented role of bacteria in the pathogenesis. In contrast to patients with C. difficile colitis, in whom a single FMT is highly effective, in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) an intensified therapy with daily or repeated FMT may be more beneficial. Whereas repeated endoscopic application are not feasible and repeated enema applications are not favored by patients a combination of endoscopic FMT and consecutive maintenance therapy with oral FMT using the FMT capsule G3 produced by OpenBiome to help establish the donor microbiome in the host seems to be the most promising approach. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety of FMT in patients with ADP and to estimate the effect size to be achieved from FMT therapy in patients with ADP for subsequent evaluation in a large definitive trial. A secondary objective is to study the microbial engraftment of donor FMT in the recipients. This proof of concept randomized placebo controlled trial with an open label extension period will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an initial endoscopic FMT followed by 14 days of oral FMT. The study has two distinct outcomes, a clinical and translational aim, to investigate the effect of FMT in patients with ADP. Aim1: Evaluation of safety, tolerability and clinical effectiveness (measured as clinical response or remission and discontinuation of antibiotic therapy) of FMT in patients with ADP. Aim 2: Evaluation of the impact of FMT on the fecal bacterial microbiome in patients with ADP, which will provide functional data about possible mechanisms of this therapy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALActive FMT, then open label FMT

Endoscopic application of OpenBiome FMT Lower Delivery followed by 2 weeks of treatment with OpenBiome FMT Capsules G3 with follow-up at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after inclusion. In case the study patient does not achieve clinical remission at week 4 or experiences a flare of disease on day 15-28 after start of the study he/she will be offered the possibility to participate in open label extension after at least 10 day of antibiotic therapy with an additional endoscopic FMT followed by 2 weeks of oral FMT. Follow-up will occur in open label at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after open label FMT.

BIOLOGICALPlacebo FMT, then open label FMT

Endoscopic application of Placebo FMT Lower Delivery followed by 2 weeks of treatment with Placebo FMT Capsules G3 with follow-up at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after inclusion. In case the study patient does not achieve clinical remission at week 4 or experiences a flare of disease on day 15-28 after start of the study he/she will be offered the possibility to participate in open label extension after at least 10 day of antibiotic therapy with an additional endoscopic FMT followed by 2 weeks of oral FMT. Follow-up will occur in open label at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after open label FMT.

Sponsors

OpenBiome
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Crohn's and Colitis Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
The Broad Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent. * Man or woman between 18 and 70 years of age. * Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) after colectomy for ulcerative colitis * Active pouchitis, defined as a modified pouch disease activity index (mPDAI) ≥ 5 and a history of ≥ 4 antibiotic therapies for pouchitis in the last 12 months or \- Need for ongoing antibiotic therapy (\> 4 weeks) to maintain clinical remission and a history of at least 2 attempts in the last 24 months to stop antibiotic therapy resulting in pouchitis episodes.

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with biologics (e.g. infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab) * Treatment with immunomodulators (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), methotrexate), steroids or any investigational drugs * Use of cholestyramine * Crohn's disease of the pouch * Known cytomegalovirus infection of the pouch * Clostridium difficile infection * Isolated cuffitis * Clinical significant strictures of the pouch inlet or outlet * Concurrent intestinal obstruction * History of familial adenomatous polyposis * History of uncontrolled lactose intolerance * History of confirmed (serological test and/or histology) celiac disease * Pregnancy, breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during the trial * Non - steroidal inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) as long-term treatment, defined as use for at least 4 days a week each month * Dysphagia (oropharyngeal, esophageal, functional, neuromuscular) * History of recurrent aspiration episodes * Proven Gastroparesis * Allergy to the following generally regarded as safe ingredients (GRAS): glycerol, acid resistant hypromellose (HPMC), gellan gum, cocoa butter, titanium dioxide * Adverse event attributable to previous FMT * Allergy/intolerance to pump inhibitor therapy * Any condition for which the investigator thinks the FMT treatment may pose a health risk (e.g. severely immunocompromised) * Participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days, simultaneous participation in another clinical trial, or previous participation in this trial * During the trial period until one week after the trial end: Non-use of appropriate contraceptives in females of childbearing potential (e.g. condoms, intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal contraception, or other means considered adequate by the responsible investigator) or in males with a child-fathering potential (condoms, or other means considered adequate by the responsible investigator during treatment - Well-founded doubt about the patient's cooperation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event24 weeksNumber of patients with FMT related adverse event (classified according to MedDRA; lowest level term) and categorized according to CTCAE Version 4.0. The safety was assessed in the randomized placebo controlled segment of the study over 24 weeks after initial endoscopic FMT weeks and if the patient should enter the open label extension part of the study also for 24 weeks after initial open label FMT. 6 patients participated in the randomized arm and 5 patients in the open label extension arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 1616 weeksClinical remission as defined by a composite assessment, of which all criteria need to be met: Clinical mPDAI score ≤4 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 16.
Number of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT4 weeksEndoscopic improvement of active pouchitis (decrease from baseline in modified pouch disease activity index endoscopic subscore \> 2 points) at week 4.
Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT4 weeksClinical remission as defined by a composite assessment, of which all criteria need to be met: Clinical modified pouch diseases activity index (mPDAI) score ≤4 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 4.
Number of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline8 weeksResponse as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 8 of the randomized phase.
Number of Patients With Clinical Response i at Week 16 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline16 weeksThis outcome measure is for patients with active pouchitis symptoms entering the trial. Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 16.
Number of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 4 in Patients Entering the Trial With Active Pouchitis Symptoms4 weeksThis outcome measure is for patients with active pouchitis symptoms entering the trial. Since all patients entered with inactive pouchitis no patient could be evaluated for this outcome. Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 4.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

1 patient after screening since he met an exclusion criterion. 6 patients went on to randomization

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active FMT, Then Open Label FMT
Endoscopic application of OpenBiome FMT Lower Delivery followed by 2 weeks of treatment with OpenBiome FMT Capsules G3 with follow-up at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after inclusion. In case the study patient does not achieve clinical remission at week 4 or experiences a flare of disease on day 15-28 after start of the study he/she will be offered the possibility to participate in open label extension after at least 10 day of antibiotic therapy with an additional endoscopic FMT followed by 2 weeks of oral FMT. Follow-up will occur in open label at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after open label FMT.
4
Placebo FMT, Then Open Label FMT
Endoscopic application of Placebo FMT Lower Delivery followed by 2 weeks of treatment with Placebo FMT Capsules G3 with follow-up at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after inclusion. In case the study patient does not achieve clinical remission at week 4 or experiences a flare of disease on day 15-28 after start of the study he/she will be offered the possibility to participate in open label extension after at least 10 day of antibiotic therapy with an additional endoscopic FMT followed by 2 weeks of oral FMT. Follow-up will occur in open label at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after open label FMT.
2
Total6

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Blinded FMT Treatment (up to 24 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy420
Open Label FMT Period (up to 24 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy004

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive FMT, Then Open Label FMTPlacebo FMT, Then Open Label FMTTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 20 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 42 / 25 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 20 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event

Number of patients with FMT related adverse event (classified according to MedDRA; lowest level term) and categorized according to CTCAE Version 4.0. The safety was assessed in the randomized placebo controlled segment of the study over 24 weeks after initial endoscopic FMT weeks and if the patient should enter the open label extension part of the study also for 24 weeks after initial open label FMT. 6 patients participated in the randomized arm and 5 patients in the open label extension arm.

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Phase: Active FMTNumber of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event0 Participants
Randomized Phase: PlaceboNumber of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event0 Participants
Open Label FMTNumber of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 16

Clinical remission as defined by a composite assessment, of which all criteria need to be met: Clinical mPDAI score ≤4 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 16.

Time frame: 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Phase: Active FMTNumber of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 160 Participants
Randomized Phase: PlaceboNumber of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 160 Participants
Open Label FMTNumber of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 161 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT

Clinical remission as defined by a composite assessment, of which all criteria need to be met: Clinical modified pouch diseases activity index (mPDAI) score ≤4 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 4.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Phase: Active FMTNumber of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT0 Participants
Randomized Phase: PlaceboNumber of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT0 Participants
Open Label FMTNumber of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 4 in Patients Entering the Trial With Active Pouchitis Symptoms

This outcome measure is for patients with active pouchitis symptoms entering the trial. Since all patients entered with inactive pouchitis no patient could be evaluated for this outcome. Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 4.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Since all patients entered with inactive pouchitis no patient could be evaluated for this outcome.

Secondary

Number of Patients With Clinical Response i at Week 16 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline

This outcome measure is for patients with active pouchitis symptoms entering the trial. Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 16.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: None of the patients in the trial entered the study with symptoms of active pouchitis

Secondary

Number of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline

Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 8 of the randomized phase.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Only 1 patient in the open label FMT completed the week 8 visit, but entered the trial in remission and thus did n to meet the criterion of a decrease of the clinical PDA sub core decrease

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Phase: Active FMTNumber of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline0 Participants
Randomized Phase: PlaceboNumber of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline0 Participants
Open Label FMTNumber of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT

Endoscopic improvement of active pouchitis (decrease from baseline in modified pouch disease activity index endoscopic subscore \> 2 points) at week 4.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: None of the patients in the randomized phase underwent an endoscopy at week 4 since they all relapsed before week 4. In the open label extension only 1 patient underwent endoscopy at week 4 and the pouch was endoscopically unchanged.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Phase: Active FMTNumber of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT0 Participants
Randomized Phase: PlaceboNumber of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT0 Participants
Open Label FMTNumber of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026