Skip to content

Recovery of Physical Functioning After Hip Fracture

Recovery of Physical Functioning, Activity Level, and Quality of Life After Hip Fracture in the Fragile Elderly

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02780076
Acronym
HIPFRAC
Enrollment
140
Registered
2016-05-23
Start date
2016-05-30
Completion date
2021-06-01
Last updated
2021-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fractures

Brief summary

The survivors after hip fracture often report severe pain and loss of physical functioning. The poor outcomes cause negative impact on the person's physical functioning and quality of life and put a financial burden on society. It is important to continue and progress the functional training that already started at the hospital, while the patients are transferred to short-term stays in a nursing home before they are returning to home. The aim presently is to examine the effects of a functional training program by a RCT design, initiated by the physiotherapist and performed by the nurses, on physical functioning while the patients are at short term stays in primary health care.

Detailed description

Functional training, such as walking and transfers, ought to be an important part of the rehabilitation after hip fracture. We have an assumption that it is of utmost importance to continue and progress the functional training that started in the acute phase at the hospital, also during the sub-acute phase while the patients are at short-term stays in nursing homes. However, there are indications of lack of resources in the nursing homes and that the nurses may be less concerned with their role and participation in the patients' rehabilitation process. Possibly, this creates a discontinuity in the rehabilitation efforts during short-term stays that may have a negative impact on the patients' recovery of physical functioning. In this study the aim is to continue and progress the functional training started during hospital stay, such as training in walking and further on repetitive sit-to-stands, as part of the daily habitual routine during short-term stays in the nursing homes. This type of functional training may be motivational and easily recognizable to the patients, and it can also be carried out by the nursing staff with only initial guiding from a physiotherapist. There is lack of knowledge on the effect of additional functional training, incorporated as part of the habitual daily routine during short-term stays, on the patients' immediate and long term recovery of physical functioning and activity level after hip fracture, compared to usual care alone. The study is designed as a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparing the effects of additional functional training (functional training group)to usual care alone (control group) during short-term stays in nursing homes.

Interventions

Patients treated for hip fracture participate in a functional training program during their short-term stays at nursing homes. The program is initiated by the nurses 4 times a day for 3 weeks as part of the habitual routine.

Sponsors

Oslo Metropolitan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with an acute low-energy hip fracture (intracapsular, trochanteric or subtrochanteric) and treated surgically, ≥ 65 years of age, living in their own homes prior to the fracture, and able to give an informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients unable to walk 10 meters with or without a walking aid prior to the fracture, have a score of less than 15 points on Minimal Mental Status Evaluation (MMS-E) in the acute phase, have a pathological fracture, life expectancies of less than three months, medical contraindications for training, or are incapable of understanding and speaking the Norwegian language.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the performance-based Short physical performance battery (SPPB)Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgeryMeasurement of physical functioning

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the performance-based measure Hand grip strengthChange 5 days - 12 monthsDynamometer
Descriptive performance-based measurement of physical activity, an accelerometer (activPAL)Descriptive from day 5 to 19 after surgeryMeasurement of physical activity
Pain in rest and while walkingChange 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgeryQuestionnaire
EuroQol (European quality of life) health status measureChange 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgeryQuestionnaire
Change in the performance-based measure Timed Up & Go (TUG)Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgeryMeasurement of mobility
New Mobility Scale (NMS)Change 5 days - 12 months after surgeryQuestionnaire
Walking HabitsChange 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgeryQuestionnaire
Fall efficacy scale (FES)Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgeryQuestionnaire
University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scaleChange 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 monthsQuestionnaire

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026