Skip to content

Evaluation of the GORE® TBE Device in the Treatment of Lesions of the Aortic Arch and Descending Thoracic Aorta, Zone 0/1

Evaluation of the GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) in the Treatment of Lesions of the Aortic Arch and Descending Thoracic Aorta, Zone 0/1

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02777528
Acronym
SSB 11-02
Enrollment
79
Registered
2016-05-19
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2028-03-01
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aorta, Lesion, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to determine whether the GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis is safe and effective in treating lesions of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta.

Detailed description

For Zone 0/1, there are two arms (Aneurysm arm, Non-aneurysm arm) and three cohorts, described as follows: Zone 0/1 Aneurysm, Zone 0/1 Dissection, and Zone 0/1 Other Isolated Lesion. The Zone 0/1 Aneurysm cohort was the only cohort analyzed with a hypothesis test, however data was collected similarly for all cohorts and for continued access Subjects. Zone 0/1 Subjects enrolled for analysis were from the United States and Japan.

Interventions

Endovascular repair with the TBE Device

PROCEDURERevascularization Procedure

Revascularization procedure of the great vessel

Sponsors

W.L.Gore & Associates
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Presence of thoracic aortic pathology deemed to warrant surgical repair which requires proximal graft placement in Zone 0-2. 2. Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature 3. Subject is capable of complying with protocol requirements, including follow-up 4. Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed by Subject or legal representative 5. Must have appropriate proximal aortic landing zone. 6. Must have appropriate target branch vessel landing zone. 7. For patients with aneurysm/isolated lesion, must have appropriate distal aortic landing zone. 8. Native aortic valve (Zone 0/1 subjects only) 9. Subject is considered a high risk candidate for conventional open surgical repair at the discretion of the Investigator (Zone 0/1 subjects only)

Exclusion criteria

1. Concomitant disease of the ascending aorta or aneurysm of the abdominal aorta requiring repair 2. Previous endovascular repair of the ascending aorta 3. Previous endovascular repair of the DTA with a non-Gore device 4. Surgery within 30 days prior to enrollment, with the exception of surgery for Ascending Aortic Dissection and/or placement of vascular conduit for access. 5. Infected aorta 6. Life expectancy \<2 years 7. Myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to treatment 8. Stroke within 6 weeks prior to treatment, stroke defined as rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function, lasting more than 24 hours or leading to death, with no apparent cause other than that of vascular origin. 9. Patient has a systemic infection and may be at increased risk of endovascular graft infection 10. Pregnant female at time of informed consent signature 11. Degenerative connective tissue disease, e.g. Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome 12. Participation in another drug or medical device study within one year of study enrollment 13. Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment 14. Presence of protruding and/or irregular thrombus and/or atheroma in the aortic arch or ascending aorta 15. Tortuous or stenotic iliac and/or femoral arteries preventing introducer sheath insertion and the inability to use a conduit for vascular access 16. Planned coverage of celiac artery 17. Patient has known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials 18. Patient has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment 19. Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or known hypersensitivity to heparin 20. Patient with a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and/or hypercoagulability state 21. Diameter taper outside of the device sizing range between proximal and distal landing zones of aorta and the inability to use additional devices of different diameters to compensate for the taper 22. Mycotic aneurysm 23. Persistent refractory shock (systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg) 24. Patient has body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate visualization of the aorta 25. Renal failure defined as patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) \<30 or currently requiring dialysis 26. Patient at high risk of neurological event, e.g. stroke

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 1 Month for Zone 0/11 monthPrimary Endpoint was composite of the following events from the time of enrollment through one month following the endovascular procedure (through day 59 unless otherwise specified): initiation of the index endovascular procedure following the debranching procedure, device technical success for the index endovascular procedure and absence of aortic rupture, lesion related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, additional unanticipated post-procedural surgical or interventional procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Limited to 30 days: disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis.
Proportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 12 Months for Zone 0/112 monthsPrimary Endpoint was composite of the following events from the time of enrollment through twelve months following the endovascular procedure: initiation of the index endovascular procedure following the debranching procedure, device technical success for the index endovascular procedure and absence of aortic rupture, lesion related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, additional unanticipated post-procedural surgical or interventional procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Limited to 30 days: disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis.

Countries

Japan, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael Dake, MD

Stanford University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHimanshu Patel, MD

University of Michigan

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study enrolled participants into 2 Zones (7 total cohorts) and results are reported by zone. This record (NCT02777528) contains the results for the 3 cohorts of Zone 0/1 (Zone 0/1 Aneurysm Cohort, Zone 0/1 Dissection Cohort, Zone 0/1 Other Isolated Lesion Cohort). Results for the 4 cohorts of Zone 2 (Zone 2 Aneurysm Cohort, Zone 2 Dissection Cohort, Zone 2 Other Lesions Cohort, Zone 2 Traumatic Transection Cohort) are reported in a separate record (NCT02777593).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Zone 0/1 Aneurysm Cohort
Aneurysm arm, hypothesis-driven cohort
50
Zone 0/1 Dissection Cohort
Non-aneurysm arm, dissection cohort
24
Zone 0/1 Other Isolated Lesion Cohort
Non-aneurysm arm, other isolated lesion cohort
3
Total77

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZone 0/1 Aneurysm CohortTotalZone 0/1 Other Isolated Lesion CohortZone 0/1 Dissection Cohort
Age, Continuous74.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.75
73.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.31
BMI27.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.94
27.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.57
23.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.01
29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.44
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
47 Participants73 Participants3 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
16 Participants18 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
6 Participants12 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
27 Participants43 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
10 participants11 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
40 participants66 participants3 participants23 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants26 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants51 Participants2 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
14 / 527 / 241 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 5221 / 242 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
43 / 5219 / 241 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 12 Months for Zone 0/1

Primary Endpoint was composite of the following events from the time of enrollment through twelve months following the endovascular procedure: initiation of the index endovascular procedure following the debranching procedure, device technical success for the index endovascular procedure and absence of aortic rupture, lesion related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, additional unanticipated post-procedural surgical or interventional procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Limited to 30 days: disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Two Zone 0/1 Aneurysm participants that are counted in the Participant Flow section above are excluded from this analysis, as pre-specified, due to treatment with 49/53 devices no longer supported by the protocol.~Primary Endpoint composite denominator was restricted to number of participants either with a primary endpoint event or imaging performed in the 12 Month window.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zone 0/1 Aneurysm CohortProportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 12 Months for Zone 0/10.727 proportion of participants
Zone 0/1 Dissection CohortProportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 12 Months for Zone 0/10.750 proportion of participants
Zone 0/1 Other Isolated Lesion CohortProportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 12 Months for Zone 0/11.0 proportion of participants
Primary

Proportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 1 Month for Zone 0/1

Primary Endpoint was composite of the following events from the time of enrollment through one month following the endovascular procedure (through day 59 unless otherwise specified): initiation of the index endovascular procedure following the debranching procedure, device technical success for the index endovascular procedure and absence of aortic rupture, lesion related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, additional unanticipated post-procedural surgical or interventional procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Limited to 30 days: disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis.

Time frame: 1 month

Population: Two Zone 0/1 Aneurysm participants that are counted in the Participant Flow section above are excluded from this analysis, as pre-specified due to treatment with 49/53 mm devices no longer supported by the protocol.~Primary Endpoint composite denominator was restricted to number of participants either with a primary endpoint event or imaging performed in the 1 Month window.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zone 0/1 Aneurysm CohortProportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 1 Month for Zone 0/10.745 proportion of participants
Zone 0/1 Dissection CohortProportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 1 Month for Zone 0/10.818 proportion of participants
Zone 0/1 Other Isolated Lesion CohortProportion of Participants With Primary Endpoint Success Through 1 Month for Zone 0/11.0 proportion of participants
Comparison: Primary endpoint success was defined as the proportion of analysis-eligible participants without a primary endpoint event and with 1-Month imaging performed.~Results were tested against a performance goal (PG) of 0.60 (i.e. 60%), derived from outcomes from a systematic review of hybrid TEVAR repair literature.~Additionally, using a one-sided alpha of 0.05 and Exact Test, minimum power of 80%, the sample needed was 50 patients.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026