Skip to content

Comparison of Intravenous Ibuprofen and Paracetamol in Patients With Sciatica Presented to the Emergency Department

Comparison of Intravenous Ibuprofen and Paracetamol in Patients With Sciatica Presented to the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02777320
Enrollment
120
Registered
2016-05-19
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2016-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sciatica

Keywords

Sciatica, Ibuprofen, Paracetamol, Emergency Medicine

Brief summary

Currently, Paracetamol and Ibuprofen are widely used by emergency physicians in Turkey for the pain treatments. The objective of the study was to assess whether intravenous Paracetamol has superior Sciatica pain reduction will compare with Ibuprofen in emergency department (ED) adults. Half of the participants will receive Paracetamol and the other half will receive Ibuprofen.

Detailed description

Paracetamol and Ibuprofen each relieve pain witf different mechanisms. Paracetamol is termed a simple analgesic and an antipyretic. Despite enduring assertions that it acts by inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-mediated production of prostaglandins, unlike non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Ibuprofen is the most commonly used and most frequently prescribed NSAID. It is a non-selective inhibitor of cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) and Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).4 Although its anti inflammatory properties may be weaker than those of some other NSAIDs, it has a prominent analgesic and antipyretic role. In our trial; The investigators aimed to compare intravenous Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in patient with Sciatica * All patients eligible for the study(Approximately 200 patient with sciatica) were randomized to one of two groups: * First Group: 1000 mg Paracetamol in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 5 minutes. * 100 ml of saline is removed before the addition of the 100 ml paracetamol to be the same volume. * Second Group: 400 mg Ibuprofen in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 5 minutes. * Drug packs were prepared according to the computer-generated random number sequence to assign treatment allocations * The allocation list was kept by the emergency nurse. Patients received the paracetamol or Ibuprofen medication schemes according to their random allocations. * After enrollment and recording of baseline information, the next numbered study drug pack was obtained, and administered as a infusion over 5 minutes. * Randomization was achieved by using computer software to generate random numbers. * One researcher blinded to patient allocation observed the whole procedure and recorded the Sciatica pain scores. * Patients in both groups received two types of medication in a similar manner (for example, 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 5 minutes), thus ensuring double blinding. * Sciatica pain scores were recorded at 0, 15, and 30 min on a VAS of 1 to 10 * Rescue medication is given patients If the clinician think it's necessary within 30 minutes after study drug administration. * All other medications required during the study also were recorded.

Interventions

DRUGparacetamol

1000 mg Paracetamol in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 5 minutes (100 ml of saline is removed before the addition of the 100 ml paracetamol to be the same volume)

DRUGIbuprofen

400 mg Ibuprofen in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 5 minutes

Sponsors

Pamukkale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who presented with complaints of leg pain radiating the sciatic nerve tracings to the emergency services (Which may or may not be accompanied back pain), * Positive Laseque test identified patients in physical examination, * Patients whose complaints have started in the last week, * Younger than 21 years old, * Older than 65 years old.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have a leg or low back pain longer than a week Have a direct blunt trauma to the legs or lumbar area in the last week, * Pretreatment linear 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) pain score less than 40 mm, * Patients who have drop foot, paralysis and other neurological symptoms in physical examination. * Patients with blood pressure less than 90mmHg in the arrival of emergency services. * Patients with malignancy, cauda equina syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory arthritis contain any of the disease in his/her CV. * Patients with any history of chronic pain syndrome. * Patients who receive pain killers, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, steroids within 6 hours before the ED visit, * Patients with a history of Substance Dependence or alcohol abuse * Patients had a fever (\>37.9) * Allergy or previous adverse reaction to the studied drugs(Ibuprofen, Paracetamol), received agents to inhibit the secretion of acid (PPIs or histamine-2 receptor antagonists), antispasmodics, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs * were pregnant or breast-feeding, * inability to comprehend the VAS evaluation, * or refused to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of Sciatica pain in Visual Analog Scale İn 30 minutes.Sciatica pain scores will be recorded at 0, 15, and 30 min.this work tooks 6 mounts

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events30 minutes after the drug administered.30 minutes after the study drug administered

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactMustafa SERINKEN, professor
aserinken@hotmail.com+905052991497
Backup ContactHayri ELICABUK, MD
hayrielicabuk@hotmail.com+905385079500

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026