Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment With SYSTANE® BALANCE

Clinical Evaluation Following Use of SYSTANE® BALANCE in Subjects With Lipid-Deficient Dry Eye

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02776670
Enrollment
308
Registered
2016-05-18
Start date
2016-07-29
Completion date
2017-11-22
Last updated
2019-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of SYSTANE® BALANCE compared to REFRESH OPTIVE® Advanced in subjects with lipid-deficient dry eye.

Interventions

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to attend all study visits; * Must sign an informed consent form; * Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 55 letters or better in each eye as assessed using an early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart; * Willing to take study products as directed for entire study; * Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, plan to become pregnant during the study, breast feeding, or not using adequate birth control methods; * Contact lens use within 30 days prior to Screening Visit, or unwilling to avoid contact lens use during the course of the study; * Use of medication excluded by the protocol; * Diseases, illnesses, infections, or ocular abnormalities excluded by the protocol; * Ocular surgeries or procedures excluded by the protocol; * Other protocol-specified

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Day 35Baseline (Day 0), Day 35TFBUT (the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking) was assessed with a fluorescein strip and measured in seconds. Using a stopwatch, the investigator measured the time from the last blink until one or more black (dry) spots appeared in the precorneal tear film. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement. Only one eye (analysis eye) contributed to the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in TFBUT at Day 35Baseline (Day 0), Day 35TFBUT (the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking) was assessed with a fluorescein strip and measured in seconds. Using a stopwatch, the investigator measured the time from the last blink until one or more black (dry) spots appeared in the precorneal tear film. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement. Only one eye (analysis eye) contributed to the analysis.
Lipid Layer Thickness (LLT) Area Under the Curve (AUC120) at Day 35Day 35LLT was measured using the LipiView® Ocular Surface Interferometer, an ophthalmic imaging device intended for use in adult patients to capture, archive, manipulate and store digital images of specular (interferometric) observations of the tear film, which can be visually monitored and photographically documented. Using these images, the LipiView® Interferometer measures the absolute thickness of the tear film lipid layer.
Mean Change From Baseline in Global Ocular Discomfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Day 35Baseline (Day 0), Day 35Ocular discomfort frequency and severity (each graded on a separate 100-units scale) were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Frequency score was in response to the question 'how often your eyes felt uncomfortable during the past week' ranging from 'Rarely' to 'All the time.' Severity score was in response to the question 'how uncomfortable your eyes felt during the past week' ranging from 'Very mildly uncomfortable' to 'Very severely uncomfortable.' The Global Ocular Discomfort Score, ranging from 0 to 100, was calculated for the given visit, as the square root of the product of the ocular discomfort frequency score multiplied by the ocular discomfort severity score. Improvement results in a reduction of the ocular discomfort frequency or severity, or both, translating into a reduction of the resulting Global Ocular Discomfort score as compared to baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 14 study centers located in Australia (2), Taiwan (1), Singapore (1), United Kingdom (1) and the US (9).

Pre-assignment details

Of the 308 enrolled, 77 were exited as screen failures prior to randomization. This reporting group includes all randomized and treated subjects (231).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SYSTANE BALANCE
Propylene glycol, 0.6% eye drops, 1 drop in each eye 4 times per day for 35 days
117
REFRESH OPTIVE
Lubricant eye drops, 1 drop in each eye 4 times per day for 35 days
114
Total231

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event02
Overall StudyOther - Reason not given01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSYSTANE BALANCEREFRESH OPTIVETotal
Age, Continuous56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.35
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.51
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
25 Participants27 Participants52 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
81 Participants76 Participants157 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
90 Participants92 Participants182 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants22 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1170 / 114
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 11713 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1171 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Day 35

TFBUT (the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking) was assessed with a fluorescein strip and measured in seconds. Using a stopwatch, the investigator measured the time from the last blink until one or more black (dry) spots appeared in the precorneal tear film. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement. Only one eye (analysis eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 35

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set. At each time point, only subjects with a value at both Baseline and that time point are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SYSTANE BALANCEMean Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Day 350.999 secondsStandard Deviation 1.9439
REFRESH OPTIVEMean Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Day 350.864 secondsStandard Deviation 1.6198
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.341, 0.601]Mixed model repeated measures (MMRM)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in TFBUT at Day 35

TFBUT (the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking) was assessed with a fluorescein strip and measured in seconds. Using a stopwatch, the investigator measured the time from the last blink until one or more black (dry) spots appeared in the precorneal tear film. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement. Only one eye (analysis eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 35

Population: Full Analysis Set. At each time point, only subjects with a value at both Baseline and that time point are included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SYSTANE BALANCEChange From Baseline in TFBUT at Day 350.985 secondsStandard Error 0.1651
REFRESH OPTIVEChange From Baseline in TFBUT at Day 350.867 secondsStandard Error 0.1702
p-value: 0.3195% CI: [-0.349, 0.585]MMRM
Secondary

Lipid Layer Thickness (LLT) Area Under the Curve (AUC120) at Day 35

LLT was measured using the LipiView® Ocular Surface Interferometer, an ophthalmic imaging device intended for use in adult patients to capture, archive, manipulate and store digital images of specular (interferometric) observations of the tear film, which can be visually monitored and photographically documented. Using these images, the LipiView® Interferometer measures the absolute thickness of the tear film lipid layer.

Time frame: Day 35

Population: Area under the curve (AUC) lipid layer thickness (LLT) was removed from formal analysis as a secondary endpoint via amendment of the standalone Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) due to a large proportion of data that were above the limit of detection.

Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Global Ocular Discomfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Day 35

Ocular discomfort frequency and severity (each graded on a separate 100-units scale) were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Frequency score was in response to the question 'how often your eyes felt uncomfortable during the past week' ranging from 'Rarely' to 'All the time.' Severity score was in response to the question 'how uncomfortable your eyes felt during the past week' ranging from 'Very mildly uncomfortable' to 'Very severely uncomfortable.' The Global Ocular Discomfort Score, ranging from 0 to 100, was calculated for the given visit, as the square root of the product of the ocular discomfort frequency score multiplied by the ocular discomfort severity score. Improvement results in a reduction of the ocular discomfort frequency or severity, or both, translating into a reduction of the resulting Global Ocular Discomfort score as compared to baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 35

Population: Full Analysis Set. At each time point, only subjects with a value at both Baseline and that time point are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SYSTANE BALANCEMean Change From Baseline in Global Ocular Discomfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Day 35-9.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.26
REFRESH OPTIVEMean Change From Baseline in Global Ocular Discomfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Day 35-8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.11
p-value: 0.61895% CI: [-6.4, 4.7]MMRM

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026