Skip to content

PPARγ Agonist Treatment for Cocaine Dependence

PPARγ Agonist Treatment for Cocaine Dependence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02774343
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-05-17
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2018-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Use Disorder, Cocaine Use Disorder

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine whether a medication called pioglitazone (trade name Actos) can reduce behavioral problems associated with cocaine use, improve brain structural changes associated with cocaine use and reduce cocaine craving and drug use in cocaine dependent patients.

Interventions

DRUGPioglitazone

Subjects randomized to pioglitazone begin with a starting dose of 15 mg daily administered. The dose will be titrated up to 30mg on the second week and 45 mg on the third week of the study. Subjects will remain on 45 mg of pioglitazone until the end of week 12. At the end of week 12 the study medication will be discontinued.

DRUGPlacebo

Subjects randomized to placebo receive placebo capsules once daily across all twelve weeks of the study.

BEHAVIORALTherapy

Cognitive-behavioral therapy 1 hour per week

BEHAVIORALContingency Management

Prize-based contingency management for attendance

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence * At least one cocaine positive urine during screening * Female subjects: a negative pregnancy test * Be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam * Be able to understand the consent form and provide written informed consent * Be able to provide the names of at least 2 persons who can generally locate their whereabouts.

Exclusion criteria

* Current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV diagnosis of any psychoactive substance dependence other than cocaine marijuana, alcohol, or nicotine * Any serious medical or psychiatric illness and/or clinically significant abnormal laboratory value, which in the judgment of the Principal Investigator or his/her designee would make study participation unsafe, or would make treatment compliance difficult or put the study staff at undue risk * Significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation * Medical conditions contraindicating pioglitazone pharmacotherapy (e.g., congestive heart failure as determined by Framingham criteria, clinically significant edema, clinically significant liver disease, hypoglycemia, diabetes, history of bladder cancer) * Taking medications known to have significant drug interactions with the study medication (CYP2C8 inhibitors or inducers, antihyperglycemic medications) * Currently being treated for substance misuse with medication * Conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court * Impending incarceration * Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the trial or nursing for female patients * Inability to read, write, or speak English (many of the research instruments in this study only exist in English) * Having plans to leave the immediate geographical area within 3 months * Unwillingness to sign a written informed consent form * Unwillingness to use a barrier method of birth control during the study for female patients * History of pacemaker or metal implants or welding or metal work without protective eyewear (for risk of MRI scans).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)Baseline and Week 12DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Craving as Assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS)Weeks 1-12The obsessive compulsive drug use scale (OCDUS) measures the level of craving for cocaine during the past week. The mean score over all time points is reported in this outcome measure (i.e., a summary score is reported). The scale was administered once weekly. It consists of 12 items. The score range is 0 to 60, and higher scores indicates greater craving.
Cue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine CravingBaseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12Every two weeks, visual analog scale ratings of craving (VAS craving) consisting of 100 mm line, anchored by 0 not at all and 100 extremely, were used to assess cocaine craving right now, craving on average in the past week, and the worst craving in the past week. Data were analyzed as a total score, which is the sum of the scores for the three questions.
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)Baseline and Week 12DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)Baseline and Week 12DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)Baseline and Week 12DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)Baseline and Week 12DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)Baseline and Week 12DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Craving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10, week 11, week 12The brief substance craving scale (BSCS) is a 16-item, self-report instrument assesses craving for cocaine and other substances of abuse over a 24 hour period. The domains of intensity, frequency, and duration are recorded on a five-point Likert scale. The range of scores for each domain is 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all three domains. The total score range is 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate higher craving (worse outcome.)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Riboflavin-Positiveweeks 1 - 12Riboflavin was added to pill capsules as a marker of medication compliance. The percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Urine samples were collected once weekly.
Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Capsules Were Takenweeks 1 - 12A modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) procedure was used for self-reports. The percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Self-reports were collected once weekly.
Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsweek 12
Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Eventsweek 12
Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Cocaine-positiveWeeks 1-12The mean percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Urine samples were collected once weekly.
Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Cocaine UseWeeks 1-12A modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) procedure was used to assess cocaine use. The mean percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Self-reports were collected once weekly.
Feasibility - Subject Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed All 12 Weeks of the Studyweek 12

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management
Pioglitazone: Subjects randomized to pioglitazone begin with a starting dose of 15 mg daily administered. The dose will be titrated up to 30mg on the second week and 45 mg on the third week of the study. Subjects will remain on 45 mg of pioglitazone until the end of week 12. At the end of week 12 the study medication will be discontinued. Therapy: Cognitive-behavioral therapy 1 hour per week Contingency Management: Prize-based contingency management for attendance
15
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management
Placebo: Subjects randomized to placebo receive placebo capsules once daily across all twelve weeks of the study. Therapy: Cognitive-behavioral therapy 1 hour per week Contingency Management: Prize-based contingency management for attendance
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementPlacebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementTotal
Age, Continuous48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.45
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Although 21 completed the study, only 18 were analyzed for this measure. This is because DTI FA data was collected for only 18 subjects. Reasons for not completing DTI: 1 subject had a brain abnormality; 1 subject refused to do the scan; and 1 scan was not completed due to scanner shutdown for maintenance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)baseline518.20 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 24.42
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)week 12522.40 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 30.85
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)baseline530.31 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 26.28
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)week 12523.00 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 36.46
Primary

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Although 21 completed the study, only 18 were analyzed for this measure. This is because DTI FA data was collected for only 18 subjects. Reasons for not completing DTI: 1 subject had a brain abnormality; 1 subject refused to do the scan; and 1 scan was not completed due to scanner shutdown for maintenance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)baseline465.06 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 22.35
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)week 12471.40 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 17.23
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)baseline463.91 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 15.92
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)week 12465.75 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 16.98
Primary

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Although 21 completed the study, only 18 were analyzed for this measure. This is because DTI FA data was collected for only 18 subjects. Reasons for not completing DTI: 1 subject had a brain abnormality; 1 subject refused to do the scan; and 1 scan was not completed due to scanner shutdown for maintenance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)baseline420.68 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 22.35
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)week 12423.91 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 17.23
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)baseline418.71 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 15.92
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)week 12418.25 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 16.98
Primary

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Although 21 completed the study, only 18 were analyzed for this measure. This is because DTI FA data was collected for only 18 subjects. Reasons for not completing DTI: 1 subject had a brain abnormality; 1 subject refused to do the scan; and 1 scan was not completed due to scanner shutdown for maintenance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)baseline566.66 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 44.18
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)week 12575.06 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 30.78
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)baseline562.52 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 29.34
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)week 12547.15 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 37.45
Primary

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Although 21 completed the study, only 18 were analyzed for this measure. This is because DTI FA data was collected for only 18 subjects. Reasons for not completing DTI: 1 subject had a brain abnormality; 1 subject refused to do the scan; and 1 scan was not completed due to scanner shutdown for maintenance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)baseline542.27 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 24.6
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)week 12546.84 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 32.79
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)baseline546.26 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 27.02
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)week 12535.14 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 27.61
Primary

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Although 21 completed the study, only 18 were analyzed for this measure. This is because DTI FA data was collected for only 18 subjects. Reasons for not completing DTI: 1 subject had a brain abnormality; 1 subject refused to do the scan; and 1 scan was not completed due to scanner shutdown for maintenance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)baseline645.49 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 48.82
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)week 12655.41 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 26.73
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)baseline635.81 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 26.26
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementBrain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)week 12620.98 DTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) valueStandard Deviation 35.51
Primary

Craving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)

The brief substance craving scale (BSCS) is a 16-item, self-report instrument assesses craving for cocaine and other substances of abuse over a 24 hour period. The domains of intensity, frequency, and duration are recorded on a five-point Likert scale. The range of scores for each domain is 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all three domains. The total score range is 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate higher craving (worse outcome.)

Time frame: Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10, week 11, week 12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 24.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 72.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 44.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 83.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 15.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 92.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 52.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 102.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 34.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.33
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 112.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 63.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 122.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)baseline5.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 123.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)baseline6.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 15.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 22.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 33.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.89
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 43.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 53.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 63.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 74.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 83.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 93.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 103.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.98
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)week 113.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Primary

Craving as Assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS)

The obsessive compulsive drug use scale (OCDUS) measures the level of craving for cocaine during the past week. The mean score over all time points is reported in this outcome measure (i.e., a summary score is reported). The scale was administered once weekly. It consists of 12 items. The score range is 0 to 60, and higher scores indicates greater craving.

Time frame: Weeks 1-12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS)19.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCraving as Assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS)21.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Primary

Cue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Craving

Every two weeks, visual analog scale ratings of craving (VAS craving) consisting of 100 mm line, anchored by 0 not at all and 100 extremely, were used to assess cocaine craving right now, craving on average in the past week, and the worst craving in the past week. Data were analyzed as a total score, which is the sum of the scores for the three questions.

Time frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 437.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 825.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.34
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 253.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 1018.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.38
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 621.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.97
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 1215.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.91
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingbaseline57.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.83
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 1227.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.2
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingbaseline52.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.49
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 240.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.38
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 435.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 629.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.27
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 835.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.2
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Cravingweek 1031.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.61
Secondary

Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Cocaine Use

A modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) procedure was used to assess cocaine use. The mean percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Self-reports were collected once weekly.

Time frame: Weeks 1-12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Cocaine Use35 percentage of self-reportsStandard Deviation 0.3
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Cocaine Use29 percentage of self-reportsStandard Deviation 0.28
Secondary

Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Cocaine-positive

The mean percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Urine samples were collected once weekly.

Time frame: Weeks 1-12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Cocaine-positive44 percentage of urine samplesStandard Deviation 0.34
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementCocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Cocaine-positive50 percentage of urine samplesStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Capsules Were Taken

A modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) procedure was used for self-reports. The percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Self-reports were collected once weekly.

Time frame: weeks 1 - 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Capsules Were Taken84.1 percentage of self-reportsStandard Error 0.105562
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Capsules Were Taken86.9 percentage of self-reportsStandard Error 0.090174
Secondary

Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Riboflavin-Positive

Riboflavin was added to pill capsules as a marker of medication compliance. The percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Urine samples were collected once weekly.

Time frame: weeks 1 - 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Riboflavin-Positive96.2 percentage of urine samplesStandard Error 0.055194
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Riboflavin-Positive95.4 percentage of urine samplesStandard Error 0.055987
Secondary

Feasibility - Subject Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed All 12 Weeks of the Study

Time frame: week 12

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Subject Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed All 12 Weeks of the Study12 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Subject Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed All 12 Weeks of the Study11 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effects

Time frame: week 12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsdrowsiness0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsnot sleeping well2 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsheadache0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsnervousness0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsblurry vision0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsdizziness0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsnausea0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsvomiting1 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsdiarrhea2 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsstomach pain3 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsmuscle aches0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsshortness of breath0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectscough4 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsincreased urination4 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectschange in sexual function1 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsweakness0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsfatigue1 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsdifficulty walking1 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsfever or chills0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsloss of appetite0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsconfusion0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectscloudiness0 Participants
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsmemory loss1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsshortness of breath1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsdrowsiness1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsdifficulty walking0 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsnot sleeping well1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectscough1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsheadache1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsconfusion1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsnervousness2 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsincreased urination1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsblurry vision2 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsfever or chills2 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsdizziness1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectschange in sexual function1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsnausea1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsmemory loss0 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsvomiting1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsweakness1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsdiarrhea1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsloss of appetite1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsstomach pain2 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsfatigue0 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectsmuscle aches1 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effectscloudiness1 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

Time frame: week 12

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency ManagementFeasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026