Hemiplegia, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
stroke, hemiplegia, rehabilitation, robotics, neuroplasticity
Brief summary
Stroke survivors with hemiplegia will be evaluated by rehabilitation professionals and asked to perform a battery of assessments to test the viability and usability of a force-feedback robot that adapts to each individual subject's performance. Subsequently, they will be asked to complete post-assessment questionnaires that provide feedback to the researchers on their observations and thoughts about the therapy devices.
Detailed description
TheraDrive is a low-cost robotic system for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. The system uses off-the-shelf computer gaming wheels with force feedback to help reduce motor impairment and improve function in the arms of stroke survivors. Preliminary results from various studies have shown that the original TheraDrive system lacked a robust mechanical linkage which could withstand the forces exerted by patients, lacked a patient-specific adaptive controller to deliver personalized therapy, and was not capable of delivering effective therapy to severely low-functioning patients. A new low-cost, high-force haptic robot with a single degree of freedom has been developed to address these concerns. This study has two purposes: first, to test the viability and usability of the new robot system alongside the original TheraDrive system; and second, to test if low-functioning patients benefit, and if so how much, from using force-feedback therapy as opposed to devices with zero impedance. This will be done by recruiting approximately 36 human subjects. Exercises will be performed by study subjects and an adaptive controller will monitor patient performance to ensure that exercises are difficult but doable, which is important for maintaining patient motivation. It is hypothesized that not only will the new system be viable, but that it will provide better robot-assisted therapy to a large variety of patients, especially low-functioning stroke survivors with hemiplegia.
Interventions
Commercial Joystick and Wheels Plus the Haptic TheraDrive Robot will be used. Haptic Theradrive is a low-cost robotic system for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. The system uses off-the-shelf computer gaming wheels with force feedback to help reduce motor impairment and improve function in the arms of stroke survivors.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Stroke survivors at least 18 years of age with hemiplegia. * The subject's stroke must have occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment in the study. * Low and Moderate functioning stroke survivors as measured by Fugl- Meyer * Not depressed * No more than Mild Cognitive Deficit * Participants must be able to sit upright for 4 hours at a time in Part A of the study; and 2 hours at a time, 3 days a week, for Part B of the study. * The subject's stroke must have occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Greater than mild cognitive deficits * Greater than mild depression. A member of the research team will administer Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) to each study participant over the phone. If the participant is found to have greater than mild depression, as measured by the BDI, they will not qualify for the study. * Receiving rehabilitation on the upper limb. * Received Botox injections within the past 3 months. * Suffering from contractures (chronic loss of joint motion) or debilitating spasticity in the upper extremity. * Experiencing greater than mild pain, and/or the PI determines that the participant should no longer continue working with the novel therapy devices, the study will be stopped.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl Meyer | At 0 weeks | The primary outcomes are motor control for the upper limb: Subjects completed tasks on scale; Motor scale maximum is 66. minimum is 0. Lower is more impaired. Higher is less impaired. |
| Box and Blocks | At Session 0. Pre-intervention | Measures ADL Function. Completed reach and grasp activities. Reached for 1 inch cube and placed with impaired arm. More blocks indicate higher function. Less blocks lower function |
| Tracking Accuracy | At Session 0 | Tracking accuracy is measured using the normalized root mean square, which is a measure for error in tracking performance with respect to a desired goal. Root mean squared divided by the maximum error if person does not move. The higher the decimal the higher the error made. Lower is better performance. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Grip Strength | pre-intervention | Grip strength as measured by a dynamometer. Subjects were asked to squeeze a dynamometer with impaired arm. Higher forces mean better function |
| Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) | pre-intervention | A brief 30-question test that takes around 10 to 12 minutes to complete and helps assess people for impairment in cognition domains. Maximum is 30. Minimum is 0; Low is \<17 is severe cognitive impairment; a score 26 and higher is normal cognition. |
| Becks Depression Scale | Pre-intervention | Measures depression. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression (Beck, et al., 1961). Maximum is 63 Total Score\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Levels of Depression 1-10\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_These ups and downs are considered normal 11-16\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Mild mood disturbance 17-20\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Borderline clinical depression 21-30\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Moderate depression 31-40\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Severe depression over 40\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Extreme depression |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Stroke survivors over the age of 18 with hemiplegia, who are three months post event, and have varying levels of impairment in the upper extremities will be recruited. All use of the TheraDrive system will take place at the Rehabilitation Robotics Lab on the first floor of Penn Rittenhouse
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Subjects With Varying Levels of Motor Impairment Subjects with varying levels of motor impairments who are ages 18 and older. | 23 |
| Total | 23 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | not completed some tasks | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Subjects With Varying Levels of Motor Impairment | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 23 Participants | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 9 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 17 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 17 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 17 |
Outcome results
Box and Blocks
Measures ADL Function. Completed reach and grasp activities. Reached for 1 inch cube and placed with impaired arm. More blocks indicate higher function. Less blocks lower function
Time frame: At Session 0. Pre-intervention
Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke Survivors With Motor Impairment | Box and Blocks | 19.11 # of blocks | Standard Deviation 15.49 |
Fugl Meyer
The primary outcomes are motor control for the upper limb: Subjects completed tasks on scale; Motor scale maximum is 66. minimum is 0. Lower is more impaired. Higher is less impaired.
Time frame: At 0 weeks
Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke Survivors With Motor Impairment | Fugl Meyer | 42.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
Tracking Accuracy
Tracking accuracy is measured using the normalized root mean square, which is a measure for error in tracking performance with respect to a desired goal. Root mean squared divided by the maximum error if person does not move. The higher the decimal the higher the error made. Lower is better performance.
Time frame: At Session 0
Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke Survivors With Motor Impairment | Tracking Accuracy | 0.73 accuracy index | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
Becks Depression Scale
Measures depression. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression (Beck, et al., 1961). Maximum is 63 Total Score\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Levels of Depression 1-10\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_These ups and downs are considered normal 11-16\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Mild mood disturbance 17-20\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Borderline clinical depression 21-30\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Moderate depression 31-40\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Severe depression over 40\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Extreme depression
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke Survivors With Motor Impairment | Becks Depression Scale | 7.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.72 |
Grip Strength
Grip strength as measured by a dynamometer. Subjects were asked to squeeze a dynamometer with impaired arm. Higher forces mean better function
Time frame: pre-intervention
Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke Survivors With Motor Impairment | Grip Strength | 26.88 lbs | Standard Deviation 22.73 |
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
A brief 30-question test that takes around 10 to 12 minutes to complete and helps assess people for impairment in cognition domains. Maximum is 30. Minimum is 0; Low is \<17 is severe cognitive impairment; a score 26 and higher is normal cognition.
Time frame: pre-intervention
Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke Survivors With Motor Impairment | Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) | 22.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.6 |