Skip to content

Usability Testing of Affordable Haptic Robots for Stroke Therapy

Usability Testing of Affordable Haptic Robots for Stroke Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02772809
Acronym
Theradrive
Enrollment
23
Registered
2016-05-16
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2020-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia, Stroke

Keywords

stroke, hemiplegia, rehabilitation, robotics, neuroplasticity

Brief summary

Stroke survivors with hemiplegia will be evaluated by rehabilitation professionals and asked to perform a battery of assessments to test the viability and usability of a force-feedback robot that adapts to each individual subject's performance. Subsequently, they will be asked to complete post-assessment questionnaires that provide feedback to the researchers on their observations and thoughts about the therapy devices.

Detailed description

TheraDrive is a low-cost robotic system for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. The system uses off-the-shelf computer gaming wheels with force feedback to help reduce motor impairment and improve function in the arms of stroke survivors. Preliminary results from various studies have shown that the original TheraDrive system lacked a robust mechanical linkage which could withstand the forces exerted by patients, lacked a patient-specific adaptive controller to deliver personalized therapy, and was not capable of delivering effective therapy to severely low-functioning patients. A new low-cost, high-force haptic robot with a single degree of freedom has been developed to address these concerns. This study has two purposes: first, to test the viability and usability of the new robot system alongside the original TheraDrive system; and second, to test if low-functioning patients benefit, and if so how much, from using force-feedback therapy as opposed to devices with zero impedance. This will be done by recruiting approximately 36 human subjects. Exercises will be performed by study subjects and an adaptive controller will monitor patient performance to ensure that exercises are difficult but doable, which is important for maintaining patient motivation. It is hypothesized that not only will the new system be viable, but that it will provide better robot-assisted therapy to a large variety of patients, especially low-functioning stroke survivors with hemiplegia.

Interventions

DEVICEHaptic Robot Therapy with Games

Commercial Joystick and Wheels Plus the Haptic TheraDrive Robot will be used. Haptic Theradrive is a low-cost robotic system for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. The system uses off-the-shelf computer gaming wheels with force feedback to help reduce motor impairment and improve function in the arms of stroke survivors.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stroke survivors at least 18 years of age with hemiplegia. * The subject's stroke must have occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment in the study. * Low and Moderate functioning stroke survivors as measured by Fugl- Meyer * Not depressed * No more than Mild Cognitive Deficit * Participants must be able to sit upright for 4 hours at a time in Part A of the study; and 2 hours at a time, 3 days a week, for Part B of the study. * The subject's stroke must have occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Greater than mild cognitive deficits * Greater than mild depression. A member of the research team will administer Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) to each study participant over the phone. If the participant is found to have greater than mild depression, as measured by the BDI, they will not qualify for the study. * Receiving rehabilitation on the upper limb. * Received Botox injections within the past 3 months. * Suffering from contractures (chronic loss of joint motion) or debilitating spasticity in the upper extremity. * Experiencing greater than mild pain, and/or the PI determines that the participant should no longer continue working with the novel therapy devices, the study will be stopped.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl MeyerAt 0 weeksThe primary outcomes are motor control for the upper limb: Subjects completed tasks on scale; Motor scale maximum is 66. minimum is 0. Lower is more impaired. Higher is less impaired.
Box and BlocksAt Session 0. Pre-interventionMeasures ADL Function. Completed reach and grasp activities. Reached for 1 inch cube and placed with impaired arm. More blocks indicate higher function. Less blocks lower function
Tracking AccuracyAt Session 0Tracking accuracy is measured using the normalized root mean square, which is a measure for error in tracking performance with respect to a desired goal. Root mean squared divided by the maximum error if person does not move. The higher the decimal the higher the error made. Lower is better performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grip Strengthpre-interventionGrip strength as measured by a dynamometer. Subjects were asked to squeeze a dynamometer with impaired arm. Higher forces mean better function
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)pre-interventionA brief 30-question test that takes around 10 to 12 minutes to complete and helps assess people for impairment in cognition domains. Maximum is 30. Minimum is 0; Low is \<17 is severe cognitive impairment; a score 26 and higher is normal cognition.
Becks Depression ScalePre-interventionMeasures depression. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression (Beck, et al., 1961). Maximum is 63 Total Score\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Levels of Depression 1-10\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_These ups and downs are considered normal 11-16\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Mild mood disturbance 17-20\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Borderline clinical depression 21-30\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Moderate depression 31-40\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Severe depression over 40\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Extreme depression

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Stroke survivors over the age of 18 with hemiplegia, who are three months post event, and have varying levels of impairment in the upper extremities will be recruited. All use of the TheraDrive system will take place at the Rehabilitation Robotics Lab on the first floor of Penn Rittenhouse

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects With Varying Levels of Motor Impairment
Subjects with varying levels of motor impairments who are ages 18 and older.
23
Total23

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studynot completed some tasks6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjects With Varying Levels of Motor Impairment
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Box and Blocks

Measures ADL Function. Completed reach and grasp activities. Reached for 1 inch cube and placed with impaired arm. More blocks indicate higher function. Less blocks lower function

Time frame: At Session 0. Pre-intervention

Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stroke Survivors With Motor ImpairmentBox and Blocks19.11 # of blocksStandard Deviation 15.49
Primary

Fugl Meyer

The primary outcomes are motor control for the upper limb: Subjects completed tasks on scale; Motor scale maximum is 66. minimum is 0. Lower is more impaired. Higher is less impaired.

Time frame: At 0 weeks

Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stroke Survivors With Motor ImpairmentFugl Meyer42.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Primary

Tracking Accuracy

Tracking accuracy is measured using the normalized root mean square, which is a measure for error in tracking performance with respect to a desired goal. Root mean squared divided by the maximum error if person does not move. The higher the decimal the higher the error made. Lower is better performance.

Time frame: At Session 0

Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stroke Survivors With Motor ImpairmentTracking Accuracy0.73 accuracy indexStandard Deviation 0.44
Secondary

Becks Depression Scale

Measures depression. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression (Beck, et al., 1961). Maximum is 63 Total Score\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Levels of Depression 1-10\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_These ups and downs are considered normal 11-16\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Mild mood disturbance 17-20\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Borderline clinical depression 21-30\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Moderate depression 31-40\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Severe depression over 40\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Extreme depression

Time frame: Pre-intervention

Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stroke Survivors With Motor ImpairmentBecks Depression Scale7.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.72
Secondary

Grip Strength

Grip strength as measured by a dynamometer. Subjects were asked to squeeze a dynamometer with impaired arm. Higher forces mean better function

Time frame: pre-intervention

Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stroke Survivors With Motor ImpairmentGrip Strength26.88 lbsStandard Deviation 22.73
Secondary

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)

A brief 30-question test that takes around 10 to 12 minutes to complete and helps assess people for impairment in cognition domains. Maximum is 30. Minimum is 0; Low is \<17 is severe cognitive impairment; a score 26 and higher is normal cognition.

Time frame: pre-intervention

Population: 6 subjects did not complete so not included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stroke Survivors With Motor ImpairmentMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)22.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026