Skip to content

Novel Portable Diagnostic Device for Automatic Detection of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect

New Automatic Portable Ophthalmology Device

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02772666
Enrollment
44
Registered
2016-05-13
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2016-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), Multiple sclerosis, Glaucoma

Brief summary

This study is to evaluate the ability of a newly designed device, Optic Nerve Glass (O-Glass) to detect relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). In this prospective study, 44 patients (diagnosed RAPD- positive) enrolled the study. They were examined for an RAPD by O-Glass and also manual swinging flashlight method (SFM) . This newly designed instrument captures and records eye pictures. The images will be processed and analyzed using computerized software to calculate pupillary measurements.

Detailed description

Pupil response to light stimulation is a basic clinical approach to the assessment of a patient with visual loss. Asymmetric response may indicate a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). The rapid detection device for relative afferent pupillary defect (present device) is a newly designed portable facility with computerized software on a mobile device. This allows for field ophthalmic examination and identification of RAPDs quickly and accurately and also record pupillary movements for further processing and analysis or send the information and images via Wi-Fi. We aimed at comparing and evaluating this device with available methods to develop a test which is practically easy and quick with objective results and no need for specialist interpretation, so that any technician can perform the test automatically. Distinctive software allows simple use of the device by field personnel with minimal training. Each patient was investigated by swinging flashlight method and the newly constructed automated O-glass. The swinging flashlight test procedure, also called as Marcus Gunn Test, is well known in ophthalmology science.The hardware for this device includes 4 different parts: Camera and optics, light control system, power control system, and the microcontroller.The two main components of the software are the ability to communicate with the hardware wirelessly, and the pattern recognition system.

Interventions

DEVICEO-Glass

The new diagnostic device to distinguish relative afferent pupillary defect(RAPD).

OTHERSwinging Flashlight Test

The swinging-flashlight test is used to help a practitioner identify a relative afferent pupillary defect.For an adequate test, vision must not be entirely lost. In dim room light, the examiner notes the size of the pupils. The patient is asked to gaze into the distance, and the examiner swings the beam of a penlight back and forth from one pupil to the other, and observes the size of pupils and reaction in the eye that is lit.

Sponsors

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* positive relative afferent pupillary defect

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Detected Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD)up to 6 monthsThe instrument illuminated the eyes alternatively and took images and recorded pupillary reflex to this light stimulation. All of 44 patients were examined with two methods, SFT and O Glass. SFT method: The well known manual method to diagnose RAPD. O glass method:The device consists of camera and light sources.The red light was on and off for a 5 second interval. Then the white light was on for right eye and 3 seconds later the system captured an image. After 0.5 second the right light was off and the left light turned on, 3 seconds later the image was captured. The images were processed and analyzed using computerized software.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
44 patients diagnosed with relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD- positive) were enrolled.
44
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous35 years
Gender
Female
18 Participants
Gender
Male
26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Iran, Islamic Republic of
44 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Detected Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD)

The instrument illuminated the eyes alternatively and took images and recorded pupillary reflex to this light stimulation. All of 44 patients were examined with two methods, SFT and O Glass. SFT method: The well known manual method to diagnose RAPD. O glass method:The device consists of camera and light sources.The red light was on and off for a 5 second interval. Then the white light was on for right eye and 3 seconds later the system captured an image. After 0.5 second the right light was off and the left light turned on, 3 seconds later the image was captured. The images were processed and analyzed using computerized software.

Time frame: up to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
O-GlassNumber of Participants With Detected Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD)44 participants
Swinging Flashlight TestNumber of Participants With Detected Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD)37 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026