Skip to content

Evaluation of Resuscitation Markers in Trauma Patients

Evaluation of Resuscitation Markers in Trauma Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02772653
Enrollment
66
Registered
2016-05-13
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2019-03-26
Last updated
2019-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypovolemic Shock, Trauma

Keywords

Microcirculation, Videomicroscopy, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, B-Type Natriuretic Peptide, Thromboelastometry, Trauma, Resuscitation, Hypovolemic shock

Brief summary

Severe trauma patients have an elevated risk of multiple organ failure and death. In order to increase survival possibilities the initial treatment must be focused into resuscitation from shock. Traditionally the most common resuscitation markers used are vital signs and urine output. Unfortunately, many patients might present normal vital signs, but still undergo a compensated shock with persistent acidosis, hence being able to develop multiple organ failure and death. Consequently, it is important to define better resuscitation markers for these patients. This investigation project consists in an observational prospective study, performed by a multidisciplinary team, in which different resuscitation markers are evaluated in severe trauma patients. There will be a specific timing (1st, 8th and 24th hours from arrival) evaluation of different markers: hemodynamic (vital signs, urine output, etc); analytical (lactate, base excess, natriuretic atrial peptide); tissue perfusion markers (NIRS); microcirculation markers (videomicroscopy) and coagulopathy markers (thromboelastometry). There will be a registry of total volume administration; blood cell transfusions and vasoactive drug requirements. Each marker will be evaluated in relation to mortality; multiple organ failure; massive transfusion protocol activation; blood cell transfusion requirement; surgical control of bleeding requirement and emergent arteriographic embolization. The objective of this study is to demonstrate which of these markers is better to predict hemodynamic evolution of severe trauma patients and might become a guide for resuscitation in the future.

Interventions

Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

OTHERBlood Base Excess

Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

OTHERBlood B-type Natriuretic Peptide

Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

OTHERBlood Thromboelastometry (ROTEM)

Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

OTHERNear-infrared spectroscopy

Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

Sponsors

Corporacion Parc Tauli
CollaboratorOTHER
Andrea Campos-Serra
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pre-hospital Priority 0 protocol activation: * Glasgow coma scale \< 14 * Systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg * Respiratory rate \< 10 or \> 29 breaths per minute * Absent peripheral pulses * Pre-hospital Priority 1 protocol activation: * All penetratin injuries to head, neck, torso and extremities proximal to elbow and knee * Flail chest * Two or more proximal long-bone fractures * Crushed, degloved or mangled extremity * Amputation proximal to wrist and ankle * Pelvic fracture * Open or depressed skull fracture * Paralysis

Exclusion criteria

* Hospitalization \< 24 hours ( transport of the patient to an other trauma center) * Patients transported from an other hospital (first hours of medical support done elsewhere)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MortalityThrough study completion, an average of 1-2 yearsDeath of the patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arteriographic embolization for bleeding controlThrough study completion, an average of 1-2 yearsNeed for arteriographic embolization on patients with active bleeding
Activation of the Massive blood transfusion protocolAt hospital admissionNeed for massive transfusion protocol activation on patients with suspicion of active bleeding
Surgical intervention for bleeding controlThrough study completion, an average of 1-2 yearsNeed for surgical control on patients with active bleeding
Multiple organ dysfunction (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score)Through study completion, an average of 1-2 yearsMarshall's score (MODS Score) consist on the analysis of 6 systems through different descriptors, those descriptors include: a) the respiratory system (pO2/FIO2 ratio); b) the renal system (serum creatinine concentration); c) the hepatic system (serum bilirrubine concentration); d) the hematologic system (platelet count); and e) the central nervous system (Glasgow Coma Scale); and f) the cardiovascular system (pressure adjusted heart rate). The cardiovascular system descriptor is calculated as the product of the heart rate and the ratio of central venous pressure to mean arterial pressure. All these descriptors will be measured during the first 24h from hospital admission.
Blood cell transfusionThrough study completion, an average of 1-2 yearsNeed for blood cell transfusion for patients

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital stayThrough study completion, an average of 1-2 yearsNumber of days that the patient remains in hospital
Intensive care unit stayThrough study completion, an average of 1-2 yearsNumber of days that the patient remains in the intensive care unit

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026