Skip to content

Feasibility of mindBEAGLE in Disorders of Consciousness or Locked-In Syndrome

Feasibility Study of the mindBEAGLE Device in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness or Locked-In Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02772302
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-05-13
Start date
2016-03-01
Completion date
2019-12-17
Last updated
2021-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Consciousness Disorders, Locked-In Syndrome

Brief summary

The primary aims of this study are: 1. To determine the feasibility of deploying mindBEAGLE, a portable, bedside EEG-based system, in the Intensive Care Unit in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) or locked-in syndrome (LIS); 2. To determine if mindBEAGLE neurophysiologic markers of cognitive function correlate with bedside behavioral assessments of consciousness; 3. To determine if mindBEAGLE neurophysiologic markers of cognitive function correlate with functional MRI (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) biomarkers of consciousness; 4. To determine if mindBEAGLE can serve as an assistive communication device for people with LIS.

Detailed description

1. To determine the feasibility of deploying mindBEAGLE, a portable, bedside EEG-based system, in the Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit in patients with DOC or LIS; 2. To determine if mindBEAGLE neurophysiologic markers of cognitive function correlate with bedside behavioral assessments of consciousness; 3. To determine if mindBEAGLE can serve as an assistive communication device for people with LIS.

Interventions

DEVICEmindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Arm 1: patients Arm 2: healthy controls

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age\>18 * Diagnosis of coma * Vegetative state * Minimally conscious state * Confusional state * Locked-in state

Exclusion criteria

• History of developmental, neurologic, or major psychiatric disorder resulting in functional disability

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)on the day of interventionLoC will be defined using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised behavioral evaluation (score range 0-23). Higher scores are generally associated with a higher level of consciousness.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
mindBEAGLE (Inpatient Participants)
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
10
mindBEAGLE (Healthy Controls)
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface tested in healthy controls to provide baseline validation of the technology.
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicmindBEAGLE (Healthy Controls)TotalmindBEAGLE (Inpatient Participants)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Age, Continuous34 years41 years56 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants20 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants14 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)

LoC will be defined using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised behavioral evaluation (score range 0-23). Higher scores are generally associated with a higher level of consciousness.

Time frame: on the day of intervention

Population: patients in the ICU (n=10) and healthy control subjects (n=10)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 63 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 32 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 710 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 22 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 813 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 42 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 916 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 55 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 1016 score on a scale
mindBEAGLEBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 10 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 1023 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 123 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 223 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 323 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 523 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 623 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 723 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 823 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 923 score on a scale
Healthy Control SubjectsBehavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)patient 423 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026