Skip to content

Influence of BCG on TDaP-IPV Vaccination

The Influence of BCG Vaccine as a Booster TDaP-IPV Vaccination: an Explorative Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02771782
Enrollment
75
Registered
2016-05-13
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2016-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Whooping Cough

Keywords

BCG, TDaP-IPV, DPT Vaccine

Brief summary

This study has three purposes: To investigate whether the immune response to pertussis is increased when TDaP-IPV is given together with BCG vaccine, compared to when it is given alone. To investigate whether BCG vaccination modulates the immune response to non vaccine target antigens (i.e., antigens/pathogens not used in the vaccine itself). To investigate whether TDaP-IPV vaccination modulates the immune response to non vaccine target antigens.

Detailed description

Rationale: The Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine not only protects against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but has also been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality caused by non-related infections. This effect is likely due to non-specific immunomodulatory effects, at least in part on the innate immune system. Additionally, BCG has been shown to improve immunogenicity of other vaccinations. In contrast, whilst the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) combination vaccine protects against infection with Bordetella pertussis, Clostridium tetani and Corynebacterium diphtheria, it has also been associated with increased mortality due to unrelated infections, particularly in girls in high-mortality countries. Although widespread DTP vaccination has initially reduced pertussis mortality, the disease has persisted and recently resurged in a number of countries with highly vaccinated populations, including the Netherlands. This has been partially attributed to the switch from a whole-cell vaccine (which is still being used in low-income countries) to a more defined acellular pertussis vaccine, which only protects for a limited period (5-8 years). Strategies to improve the efficacy of pertussis vaccination are therefore urgently required. As the BCG vaccine has already been used to improve the immunogenicity of other vaccines, the investigators hypothesize that BCG vaccination before or at the same time of DTP vaccination increases the immunogenicity of the DTP vaccine in terms of antibody and T-cell responses to pertussis. Moreover, the investigators aim to assess the effect of DTP vaccination on the known long-term beneficial non-specific effects of BCG on non-mycobacterial infections. Objective: To examine the effect of BCG as an adjuvant on DTP vaccination, and to investigate the non-specific training effects of BCG and DTP, alone and in combination, on the innate immune system. Study population: Healthy adult volunteers. Main study parameters: Comparison of pertussis-specific antibody and T-cell responses, as well as gene transcription between BCG, TDaP-IPV and BCG+TDaP-IPV vaccinated groups. Comparison of cytokine responses to unrelated antigens and/or pathogens before and after BCG, TDaP-IPV or BCG+TDaP-IPV vaccination. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: There is no direct benefit to the study participants but these results will potentially lead to novel strategies to optimize vaccinations. The risks for participants are negligible, with the only expected risks being minor side-effects from vaccination and local hematoma forming at the site of venepuncture. This will be minimized by the performance of these procedures by experienced personnel.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBCG vaccine (SSI)
BIOLOGICALTDaP-IPV vaccine

Sponsors

University of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy females

Exclusion criteria

* systemic medication use other than oral contraceptive drugs * history of disease resulting in immunodeficiency * previous vaccination with BCG * pregnancy * allergy to neomycin or polymyxin * known previous allergic reaction to vaccination with diphteria, tetanus, pertussis or polio vaccines * One of following phenomena after previous vaccination with pertussis containing antigens: Fever \>40 °C within 48 hours after vaccination, hypotonous-hyporesponsiveness episode within 48 hours after vaccination, convulsions with or without fever within 3 days after vaccination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
B-cell phenotype analysis2 weekspertussis specific B-cells will be analyzed by FACS
Antibody response to TDaP-IPV2 weeksantibody titers to antigens in the TDaP-IPV (PT, FHA, Prn, DT, TT) will be measured.
PBMC cytokine response to pertussis related antigens2 weeksIL-6, TNF, IL-1b, IL-10, IL-17, IL-22, IFN-g
T-cell response to TDaP-IPV2 weeksT-cell responses will be measured by FACS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Transcriptional profile of PBMCs1 dayTranscriptional profile of PBMCs will be measured by RNAseq to assess for active gene transcription programs
PBMC responses to heterologous antigens1 dayPBMCs will be stimulated with LPS, S. aureus, C.albicans, PHA, S.pneumoniae, zymosan. Responses on cytokine levels (IL-6, TNF, IL-1b, IL-10, IL-17, IL-22, IFN-g) and ROS production will be measured
Epigenetic markers of monocytes1 dayLevels of activating and inhibiting epigenetic marks will be assessed

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Leukocyte differential count1 day,Leukocyte differential counts will be performed
NK cell function2 weeksdegranulation of NK cells upon stimulation with tumor cells will be assessed
NK Cell phenotype3 monthsNK cell activation markers will be assessed by FACS
NK cell phenotype2 weeksNK cell activation markers will be assessed by FACS

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026