Partially Edentulous Jaws
Conditions
Keywords
Removable partial dentures, partial edentulism
Brief summary
Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are traditionally fabricated by lost-wax casting technique, a time-consuming and very laborious manual technique. Recently, fabricating removable partial dentures using computer designing and laser sintering techniques have been introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient satisfaction with new computer-generated removable partial dentures and compare it to the traditional removable partial dentures.
Detailed description
Patients seeking Removable partial dentures in the undergraduate clinic at McGill University were asked to participate in the study. Patients were treated by undergraduate students under the supervision of expert prosthodontists. Both the dentists treating the case and the patients were blinded to the type of RPD used. The Principal investigator was responsible for preparing the laboratory prescriptions and sending the final impressions to the dental lab in order to assure blinding of the patient and the treating dentists. Patients were treated according to standardized clinical procedures. Both dentures were fabricated from one master cast to ensure standardization. The cast was scanned digitally to fabricate the laser-sintered dentures, and then was used to fabricate the cast dentures traditionally using lost-wax casting technique. For each patient, two dentures were fabricated from one final impression; one by casting technique and the other by laser-sintering. Patients were given randomly one denture first and followed-up for 1, 2 and 4 weeks. Then, they were given the second denture and followed-up again. At each follow-up visit, patients filled McGill Denture Satisfaction Instrument. At the end of the study patients were asked which denture they prefer to keep.
Interventions
DEVICELaser-sintered removable partial denture
The master cast was scanned using 3D scanner. In the digital file, the path of insertion was determined using a special software. The survey line was drawn and all undesirable undercuts were eliminated. After that, the entire framework design was built virtually 3 dimensionally using a special software (3Shape Software) according to the specified design in three steps: deciding the contour of the component, building the tissue surface then creating the polished surface. The file was saved in STL file and was transferred to rapid prototyping machine. Framework was produced by selective laser sintering technique using the alloy powder (Sintech Metal).
OTHERcast removable partial dentures
The denture was fabricated traditionally using lost-wax casting technique.
Sponsors
3DRPD Inc.
Faleh Tamimi
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* partially edentulous * have adequate space for regularly sized prosthetic teeth and metal frame(s) * be able to maintain adequate oral hygiene and clean their dentures; do not have major systemic health problems that could interfere with general oral health * have an adequate understanding of written and spoken English or French * be capable of giving written informed consent and fill out questionnaires
Exclusion criteria
* there is a lack of minimum interocclusal space to accommodate a metal frame and acrylic material * they have acute or chronic symptoms of parafunctional disorders * they have inflammatory mucosal conditions such as lichen planus, progressive periodontitis or others * they have a history of radiation therapy to the orofacial region * there are health conditions that may jeopardize the treatment, such as alcoholism, * they are taking any phenytoin (Dilantin), cortisone or insulin * they have a severe/serious illness that requires frequent hospitalization * they have impaired cognitive or motor function * they are unable to return for evaluations/study recalls
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean of patient satisfaction measured by McGill Denture Satisfaction Survey using visual analog scale from 0-100 | after 4 weeks | Mean patient satisfaction in McGill Denture Satisfaction Survey was assessed in regard to 9 aspects of the dentures; general satisfaction, chewing efficiency, chewing ability, easiness to clean, stability, comfort and oral condition. Mean of patient satisfaction in each of these 9 aspects will be presented for both cast and laser-sintered dentures. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants who choose to keep the laser-sintered removable partial dentures | after 2 months | Patients will be asked which denture did they prefer to keep after trying both cast and laser-sintered removable partial dentures. The number of patients who preferred each denture will be presented as well as the number of patients who have no preference. |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed