Intubation, Intratracheal
Conditions
Brief summary
This study compare the intubation success rate between video laryngoscope and rigid video stylet in cervical spine surgery patients. Half of patients will receive endotracheal intubation by video laryngscope, other half of patients will receive endotracheal intubation by rigid video laryngoscope.
Detailed description
Video laryngoscope and lightwand are widely used at endotracheal intubation in cervical spine patients. Video laryngoscope is useful because of identification of anatomic structure around the oral cavity and vocal cord. Rigid video stylet resemble lightwand, but it has a video at the end of stylet. So rigid video stylet is useful at confirmation of vocal cord.
Interventions
DEVICERigid video stylet
DEVICEVideo laryngoscope
Sponsors
Seoul National University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 20\ 80 years old adult patients, ASA class I-III * Cervical spine surgery in general anesthesia
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who did not agree with the study * History of GERD * Congenital or acquired lesion like tumor, polyp, trauma, abcess, inflammation, foreign body * Surgery of trachea or airway * History of radiation around neck area * Increased possibility of aspiration * Coagulation abnormality
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparison of success rate between two groups | immediately |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Survey of blood tinged endotracheal tube, bleeding in oral cavity, hoarseness, sore throat | Within 24 hours after endotracheal intubation |
Contacts
Primary ContactHee-Pyoung Park, MD, PhD
Backup ContactJe Do Son, MD
Outcome results
None listed