Skip to content

Exercise Capacity Study of LCZ696 vs. Enalapril in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Assess the Effect of LCZ696 Compared With Enalapril to Improve Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02768298
Enrollment
201
Registered
2016-05-11
Start date
2016-07-12
Completion date
2019-11-25
Last updated
2021-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Keywords

LCZ696, sacubitril/valsartan, VO2peak, heart failure, systolic heart failure, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, exercise capacity

Brief summary

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of LCZ696 vs. enalapril on improvement of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Detailed description

This study was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active-controlled, two-arm trial to compare LCZ696 200 mg twice daily (bid) to enalapril 10 mg bid in improving exercise capacity, daily physical activity and quality of life in patients with stable chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association III) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%). The study consisted of a screening period of 2 weeks during which the subject's eligibility for the study was assessed followed by a double blind treatment period of 12 weeks. Eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either LCZ696 or enalapril during the double-blind period. Treatment was initiated with LCZ696 100 mg bid or enalapril 5 mg bid (enalapril 10 mg bid for patients at a stable daily dose of enalapril above 10 mg per day or corresponding doses of other angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) prior first screening visit), respectively. Dose was up-titrated after 2 weeks to the final dose of LCZ696 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid. Patients continued to take their background medications for chronic heart failure during the study, with the exception of ACEI or ARBs which were replaced by investigational treatment and had to be discontinued before first dose of study drug. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of LCZ696 200 mg bid compared to enalapril 10 mg bid in improving exercise tolerance (peak respiratory oxygen uptake (VO2peak), adjusted to body weight) as assessed by cardio-pulmonary-exercise testing (CPET) in patients with stable chronic heart failure (NYHA III) and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) after 3 months treatment.

Interventions

DRUGLCZ696

LCZ696 100 mg bid for 2 weeks followed by LCZ696 200 mg bid for 10 weeks. Treatment was administered as oral tablets.

DRUGEnalapril

Enalapril 5 mg bid for 2 weeks followed by enalapril 10 mg bid for 10 weeks. Treatment was administered as oral tablets. Patients who prior Screening were at a stable daily dose of enalapril above 10 mg per day (or corresponding doses of other ACEI/ARB) started the study at a dose of enalapril 10 mg bid.

Patients randomized to LCZ696 arm also received placebo matching enalapril (enalapril 0 mg tablets) to ensure the blinding during the entire course of the study.

DRUGPlacebo matching LCZ696

Patients randomized to enalapril arm also received placebo matching LCZ696 (LCZ696 0 mg tablets) to ensure the blinding during the entire course of the study.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure (NYHA class III) and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) * Reduced ability to exercise, evidenced by VO2peak ≤ 18 ml/min per kg * Patients had to be on an ACEI or an ARB at a stable dose of at least enalapril 10 mg/d or equivalent for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit and until randomization visit.

Exclusion criteria

* History of hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the study drugs, drugs of similar chemical classes, ACEIs, ARBs, or NEP inhibitors as well as known or suspected contraindications to the study drugs * Previous history of intolerance to recommended target doses of ACEIs or ARBs * Known history of angioedema * Requirement of treatment with both ACEIs and ARBs * Current acute decompensated HF (exacerbation of chronic HF manifested by signs and symptoms that may require intravenous therapy) * Symptomatic hypotension * Impaired renal function * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Peak Respiratory Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) Adjusted to Body Weight) After 3 Months of TreatmentBaseline, 3 monthsCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method to evaluate the exercise tolerance of heart failure patients by evaluating the cardio-pulmonary system using the measurement of respiratory gases during physical (exercise) stress. One of the parameters attained by this test is the peak respiratory oxygen uptake (VO2peak). CPET to assess VO2peak was performed at a cycle ergometer at baseline (Visit 2, 9 days prior randomization) and after 6 weeks and 3 months of treatment (Visit 6 and Visit 7, respectively). The VO2peak adjusted to body weight was calculated based on the corresponding visit's VO2peak (unadjusted) and body weight data by using the following formula: VO2peak (unadjusted)/body weight. Higher values of VO2peak indicate less symptom severity and therefore a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Peak Respiratory Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) Adjusted to Body Weight) After 6 Weeks of TreatmentBaseline, 6 weeksCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method to evaluate the exercise tolerance of heart failure patients by evaluating the cardio-pulmonary system using the measurement of respiratory gases during physical (exercise) stress. One of the parameters attained by this test is the peak respiratory oxygen uptake (VO2peak). CPET to assess VO2peak was performed at a cycle ergometer at baseline (Visit 2, 9 days prior randomization) and after 6 weeks and 3 months of treatment (Visit 6 and Visit 7, respectively). The VO2peak adjusted to body weight was calculated based on the corresponding visit's VO2peak (unadjusted) and body weight data by using the following formula: VO2peak (unadjusted)/body weight. A positive change from baseline indicates less symptom severity.
Change From Baseline in the Minute Ventilation (VE) to Carbon Dioxide Output Slope (VE/VCO2 Slope)Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 monthsCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method to evaluate the exercise tolerance of heart failure patients by evaluating the cardio-pulmonary system using the measurement of respiratory gases during physical (exercise) stress. One of the parameters attained by this test is the minute ventilation (VE) to carbon dioxide output slope (VE/VCO2 slope). High values of VE/VCO2 slope resembles the inability to eliminate CO2 by respiration (inefficient ventilation). A negative change from baseline indicates less symptom severity.
Change From Baseline in Exercise Capacity (Watt) at Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 monthsCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method to evaluate the exercise tolerance of heart failure patients by evaluating the cardio-pulmonary system using the measurement of respiratory gases during physical (exercise) stress. CPET was performed at a cycle ergometer with a workload that started at 10 watts (W) and then increased by 10W for each 1-minute stage. Exercise capacity assessed as workload in watts was determined at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) which represents the transition from aerobic to partially anaerobic glucose metabolism in muscle, leading to increasing carbon dioxide exhalation in comparison to oxygen uptake. A positive change from baseline in exercise capacity (watt) indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Rate of Perceived Exertion (Perceived Dyspnea and Perceived Fatigue) During Exercise Assessed by Borg ScaleBaseline, 3 monthsThe individually perceived exertion, in terms of perceived dyspnea and perceived fatigue, during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was assessed by Borg scale which is a 15 point scale, starting from 6 which indicates No exertion at all to 20 which means Maximal exertion. Change in Borg scale for both perceived dyspnea and perceived fatigue were measured at different time points at Baseline (Visit 2, 9 days prior randomization) and 3 months of treatment (Visit 7). Maximum value among the time points at every visit was used for the analysis. A negative change from baseline in Borg value of perceived dyspnea and perceived fatigue indicates improvement.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in 34 investigative sites in Germany.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either LCZ696 or enalapril during the double-blind period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LCZ696
LCZ696 100 mg oral twice daily (bid) for 2 weeks followed by LCZ696 200 mg oral bid for 10 weeks.
103
Enalapril
Enalapril 5 mg oral twice daily (bid) for 2 weeks followed by enalapril 10 mg oral bid for 10 weeks. Patients who prior Screening were at a stable daily dose of enalapril above 10 mg per day (or corresponding doses of other ACEI/ARB) started the study at a dose of enalapril 10 mg bid.
98
Total201

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event14
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall StudyNon-compliance with study treatment01
Overall StudySubject/guardian decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal of informed consent01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLCZ696EnalaprilTotal
Age, Continuous66.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.792
67.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.961
66.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.396
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucassian
101 Participants96 Participants197 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants21 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
86 Participants77 Participants163 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1031 / 98
other
Total, other adverse events
52 / 10336 / 98
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 10314 / 98

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Peak Respiratory Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) Adjusted to Body Weight) After 3 Months of Treatment

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method to evaluate the exercise tolerance of heart failure patients by evaluating the cardio-pulmonary system using the measurement of respiratory gases during physical (exercise) stress. One of the parameters attained by this test is the peak respiratory oxygen uptake (VO2peak). CPET to assess VO2peak was performed at a cycle ergometer at baseline (Visit 2, 9 days prior randomization) and after 6 weeks and 3 months of treatment (Visit 6 and Visit 7, respectively). The VO2peak adjusted to body weight was calculated based on the corresponding visit's VO2peak (unadjusted) and body weight data by using the following formula: VO2peak (unadjusted)/body weight. Higher values of VO2peak indicate less symptom severity and therefore a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: Full Analysis Set including patients with a valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LCZ696Change From Baseline in Peak Respiratory Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) Adjusted to Body Weight) After 3 Months of Treatment0.51 mL/kg/minStandard Error 0.18
EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Peak Respiratory Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) Adjusted to Body Weight) After 3 Months of Treatment0.19 mL/kg/minStandard Error 0.188
p-value: 0.232795% CI: [-0.21, 0.85]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Exercise Capacity (Watt) at Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method to evaluate the exercise tolerance of heart failure patients by evaluating the cardio-pulmonary system using the measurement of respiratory gases during physical (exercise) stress. CPET was performed at a cycle ergometer with a workload that started at 10 watts (W) and then increased by 10W for each 1-minute stage. Exercise capacity assessed as workload in watts was determined at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) which represents the transition from aerobic to partially anaerobic glucose metabolism in muscle, leading to increasing carbon dioxide exhalation in comparison to oxygen uptake. A positive change from baseline in exercise capacity (watt) indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months

Population: Full Analysis Set including patients with a valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LCZ696Change From Baseline in Exercise Capacity (Watt) at Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)6 weeks1.71 WattStandard Error 1.168
LCZ696Change From Baseline in Exercise Capacity (Watt) at Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)3 months2.45 WattStandard Error 1.436
EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Exercise Capacity (Watt) at Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)6 weeks0.83 WattStandard Error 1.234
EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Exercise Capacity (Watt) at Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)3 months-0.83 WattStandard Error 1.483
Comparison: 6 weeksp-value: 0.618195% CI: [-2.58, 4.32]ANCOVA
Comparison: 3 monthsp-value: 0.125495% CI: [-0.93, 7.48]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Peak Respiratory Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) Adjusted to Body Weight) After 6 Weeks of Treatment

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method to evaluate the exercise tolerance of heart failure patients by evaluating the cardio-pulmonary system using the measurement of respiratory gases during physical (exercise) stress. One of the parameters attained by this test is the peak respiratory oxygen uptake (VO2peak). CPET to assess VO2peak was performed at a cycle ergometer at baseline (Visit 2, 9 days prior randomization) and after 6 weeks and 3 months of treatment (Visit 6 and Visit 7, respectively). The VO2peak adjusted to body weight was calculated based on the corresponding visit's VO2peak (unadjusted) and body weight data by using the following formula: VO2peak (unadjusted)/body weight. A positive change from baseline indicates less symptom severity.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set including patients with a valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LCZ696Change From Baseline in Peak Respiratory Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) Adjusted to Body Weight) After 6 Weeks of Treatment0.28 mL/kg/minStandard Error 0.185
EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Peak Respiratory Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) Adjusted to Body Weight) After 6 Weeks of Treatment0.42 mL/kg/minStandard Error 0.195
p-value: 0.624795% CI: [-0.68, 0.41]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Rate of Perceived Exertion (Perceived Dyspnea and Perceived Fatigue) During Exercise Assessed by Borg Scale

The individually perceived exertion, in terms of perceived dyspnea and perceived fatigue, during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was assessed by Borg scale which is a 15 point scale, starting from 6 which indicates No exertion at all to 20 which means Maximal exertion. Change in Borg scale for both perceived dyspnea and perceived fatigue were measured at different time points at Baseline (Visit 2, 9 days prior randomization) and 3 months of treatment (Visit 7). Maximum value among the time points at every visit was used for the analysis. A negative change from baseline in Borg value of perceived dyspnea and perceived fatigue indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: Full Analysis Set including patients with a valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LCZ696Change From Baseline in Rate of Perceived Exertion (Perceived Dyspnea and Perceived Fatigue) During Exercise Assessed by Borg ScaleBorg value perceived dyspnea-0.19 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.212
LCZ696Change From Baseline in Rate of Perceived Exertion (Perceived Dyspnea and Perceived Fatigue) During Exercise Assessed by Borg ScaleBorg value perceived fatigue-0.04 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.167
EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Rate of Perceived Exertion (Perceived Dyspnea and Perceived Fatigue) During Exercise Assessed by Borg ScaleBorg value perceived fatigue-0.20 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.178
EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Rate of Perceived Exertion (Perceived Dyspnea and Perceived Fatigue) During Exercise Assessed by Borg ScaleBorg value perceived dyspnea0.11 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.223
Comparison: Borg value dyspneap-value: 0.343295% CI: [-0.93, 0.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: Borg value fatiguep-value: 0.531995% CI: [-0.34, 0.65]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Minute Ventilation (VE) to Carbon Dioxide Output Slope (VE/VCO2 Slope)

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method to evaluate the exercise tolerance of heart failure patients by evaluating the cardio-pulmonary system using the measurement of respiratory gases during physical (exercise) stress. One of the parameters attained by this test is the minute ventilation (VE) to carbon dioxide output slope (VE/VCO2 slope). High values of VE/VCO2 slope resembles the inability to eliminate CO2 by respiration (inefficient ventilation). A negative change from baseline indicates less symptom severity.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months

Population: Full Analysis Set including patients with a valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LCZ696Change From Baseline in the Minute Ventilation (VE) to Carbon Dioxide Output Slope (VE/VCO2 Slope)6 weeks-1.05 no unitsStandard Error 0.597
LCZ696Change From Baseline in the Minute Ventilation (VE) to Carbon Dioxide Output Slope (VE/VCO2 Slope)3 months0.76 no unitsStandard Error 0.542
EnalaprilChange From Baseline in the Minute Ventilation (VE) to Carbon Dioxide Output Slope (VE/VCO2 Slope)6 weeks0.18 no unitsStandard Error 0.629
EnalaprilChange From Baseline in the Minute Ventilation (VE) to Carbon Dioxide Output Slope (VE/VCO2 Slope)3 months-0.07 no unitsStandard Error 0.575
Comparison: 6 weeksp-value: 0.167895% CI: [-2.98, 0.52]ANCOVA
Comparison: 3 monthsp-value: 0.305295% CI: [-0.77, 2.43]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026