Skip to content

Long-Term Effectiveness of Walking Training in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Personalized Gait Training With Feedback to Reduce Knee Pain From Osteoarthritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02767570
Enrollment
68
Registered
2016-05-10
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2020-10-31
Last updated
2022-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Knee, Arthritis, Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Rheumatic Diseases

Brief summary

Nearly one out of every two Americans will develop knee osteoarthritis by age 85. Over 20 million Americans, including nearly three million Veterans, currently have painful knee arthritis that limits their daily activity or recreation. The vast majority of those individuals will be prescribed anti-inflammatory drugs that provide some pain relief but do not slow the progression of the disease. Often people with knee arthritis are told they must live with the pain until they become appropriate candidates for knee replacement surgery, but that can require tolerating the pain and limiting function for many years. Because of other health issues, some individuals are never acceptable surgery candidates. What is desperately needed are better conservative approaches for treating these patients. Two such approaches will be tested and compared in this study.

Detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial to investigate conservative treatments for individuals with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study will recruit participants who have isolated, medial compartment knee OA. Subjects will be assigned to one of two gait training groups. Both groups will undergo gait analysis to determine their foot progression angle at their comfortable walking speed. Both groups will receive personalized gait retraining to either alter their foot progression angle or to achieve consistency of their natural foot progression angle. Gait retraining will consist of once a week sessions for six weeks. The gait training will use a fading feedback approach, where the percentage of each weekly session during which feedback is used is decreased from week to week until no feedback is used by the last training session. Throughout the six-week training period subjects will be encouraged to practice their gait for at least ten minutes per day. Subjects will continue to practice their gait throughout the remainder of the 52-week intervention. Subjects will have their walking activity recorded using a 3-axis pedometer. Compared to their baseline walking activity, participants will be instructed to increase their daily walking by ten minutes per day throughout the 52-week intervention. All subjects will receive monthly phone calls to encourage maintaining a regular walking regimen. Walking activity will be monitored periodically using a pedometer. Subjects will receive knee MRIs and weight-bearing knee radiographs at the start and end of the study. All participants will complete pain evaluations and clinical knee score questionnaires during the study. The investigators expect that subjects in both groups will have a reduction in knee pain over the course of the 52-week intervention. The primary objective of the study it to determine if the change in pain between baseline and week 52 is different between the two groups.

Interventions

OTHERGait Training; Altered Foot Progression Angle

Participants will receive personalized gait training while walking on a treadmill with real-time, haptic feedback to encourage them to adopt a new foot progression angle. Participants will walk for an additional ten minutes per day to internalize their new foot progression angle over 52 weeks.

OTHERGait Training; Consistent Foot Progression Angle

Participants will receive personalized gait training while walking on a treadmill with haptic feedback to encourage them to maintain a consistent foot progression angle. Participants will walk an additional ten minutes per day to internalize the consistency of their foot progression angle over 52 weeks.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with isolated, medial compartment knee OA of at least six months duration * Kellgren-Lawrence grade of I, II, or III * Age greater than 18 years at the time of enrollment * Ability to give informed consent * Knee pain more than three days per week on average * Average knee pain in medial compartment between 3 and 9 on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, and greater than pain in other compartments * Ambulatory without aids * Able to walk for at least 25 consecutive minutes * Able to walk on treadmill safely at 0.7 m/s or faster * Able to reduce the prominent peak of the knee adduction moment by changing foot progression angle

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index equal to or greater than 35 * Pregnancy * Plans for knee replacement within the next 12 months * Contraindications to MRI * Nerve or muscle disease associated with walking difficulty * Narcotic pain medication usage * History of rheumatoid arthritis or autoimmune disease * An episode of gout or pseudogout in the knee in the past year * History of neuropathic arthropathy, infectious disease, or other major systemic diseases * Current or recent past use (within two months) of oral corticosteroids * Cognitive impairments that would limit a subject's understanding * Expecting a significant change in activity level or weight within the next 12 months * Regularly participates in high impact activities such as running, soccer, basketball, etc. * Unable to perform the 3rd stage of the 4-stage balance test, which involves holding a tandem stance for 10 seconds The following criteria apply only to the affected osteoarthritic limb: * History of symptomatic arthritis in lower limb joints other than the knees that is more severe than knee arthritis * Replacement of any lower extremity joint * Lateral tibiofemoral joint space width less than medial * Recurrent giving way of the knee * Symptoms arising primarily from a meniscal or ligament pathology or other structure not directly related to osteoarthritis as identified by physical exam, health record, or MRI * Symptoms originating primarily from the patellofemoral joint * Avascular necrosis * Recent (within two months) knee injury or surgery * Planned use of hinged knee brace in next 12 months * Severe knee malalignment of more than 10 degrees from neutral * Intra-articular injection within the past 2 months or planned for the next 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Medial Knee PainBaseline and Week 52Change in medial knee pain between baseline and week 52 using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess average medial knee pain over the past 7 day period. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Change = (Week 52 score - Baseline score).
Change in Knee Adduction MomentBaseline and Week 52Change in magnitude of the more prominent peak in the knee adduction moment (KAM), a surrogate measure for medio-lateral load distribution in the knee, between baseline and week 52. A reduction in KAM indicates a shift in loading from the medial to the lateral compartment of the knee. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Medial T1rho Relaxation TimeBaseline and Week 52Change in T1rho relaxation time measured from quantitative MRI in the medial compartment of the knee between baseline and week 52. T1ρ relaxation time is sensitive to changes in proteoglycan content in the articular cartilage. Increased values of T1rho indicate increased depletion of proteoglycans and increased cartilage degeneration. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).
Change in Medial T2 Relaxation TimeBaseline and Week 52Change in T2 relaxation time measured from quantitative MRI in the medial compartment of the knee between baseline and week 52. T2 relaxation time is sensitive to changes in water content and collagen matrix integrity of the articular cartilage. Increased values of T2 indicate increased cartilage degeneration. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).
Change in Lateral T1rho Relaxation TimeBaseline and Week 52Change in T1rho relaxation time measured from quantitative MRI in the lateral compartment of the knee between baseline and week 52. T1ρ relaxation time is sensitive to changes in proteoglycan content in the articular cartilage. Increased values of T1rho indicate increased depletion of proteoglycans and increased cartilage degeneration. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).
Change in Lateral T2 Relaxation TimeBaseline and Week 52Change in T2 relaxation time measured from quantitative MRI in the lateral compartment of the knee between baseline and week 52. T2 relaxation time is sensitive to changes in water content and collagen matrix integrity of the articular cartilage. Increased values of T2 indicate increased cartilage degeneration. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited via clinician referrals, approved searches of medical record databases, and advertisements in print media and online. The first participant was enrolled in August 2016 and the last participant was enrolled in June 2019.

Pre-assignment details

Interested individuals were initially screened via telephone or web-based questionnaire. Eligible individuals then underwent an in-person screen to confirm the location and severity of knee pain. Anterior-posterior weightbearing radiographs were obtained and given a KL grade. Participants who met the radiographic inclusion criteria were invited to the motion laboratory for a gait assessment. Those who were able to reduce their KAM peak by at least 5% with an FPA modification were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gait Training; Altered Foot Progression Angle
Participants will receive personalized gait training while walking on a treadmill with real-time, haptic feedback. The goal of the training is to encourage participants to adopt an altered foot progression angle in an attempt to alter the distribution of forces crossing the knee joint. Training will occur once a week for six weeks. This will be followed by a 46-week home and community-based walking program to practice and internalize the new personalized, gait pattern and to encourage daily walking. Refresher training with haptic feedback will be offered at weeks 11, 25 and 39 to enhance internalization of the new foot progression angle. Gait Training; Altered Foot Progression Angle: Participants will receive personalized gait training while walking on a treadmill with real-time, haptic feedback to encourage them to adopt a new foot progression angle. Participants will walk for an additional ten minutes per day to internalize their new foot progression angle over 52 weeks.
34
Gait Training; Consistent Foot Progression Angle
Participants will receive personalized gait training while walking on a treadmill with haptic feedback. The goal of the training is to encourage participants to maintain a consistent foot progression angle in an attempt to minimize the variability in the forces crossing the knee joint. Training will occur once a week, for 6 weeks. This will be followed by a 46-week home and community-based walking program to encourage daily walking. Refresher training with haptic feedback will be offered at weeks 11, 25 and 39 to maintain foot progression angle consistency. Gait Training; Consistent Foot Progression Angle: Participants will receive personalized gait training while walking on a treadmill with haptic feedback to encourage them to maintain a consistent foot progression angle. Participants will walk an additional ten minutes per day to internalize the consistency of their foot progression angle over 52 weeks.
34
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCOVID shutdown25
Overall StudyIncreased pain20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up30
Overall StudyReceived intra-articular injection01
Overall StudyUnrelated medical issue11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGait Training; Altered Foot Progression AngleGait Training; Consistent Foot Progression AngleTotal
Age, Continuous64.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.66
64.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.63
64.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.59
Body Mass Index25.53 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.26
27.37 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.95
26.45 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.71
Daily steps6343 steps/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2678
6280 steps/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3073
6311 steps/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2860
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
34 Participants34 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
KAM peak, natural FPA3.25 %Bodyweight*Height
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
3.30 %Bodyweight*Height
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
3.27 %Bodyweight*Height
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04
KAM peak, target FPA2.87 %Bodyweight*Height
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
3.30 %Bodyweight*Height
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
3.08 %Bodyweight*Height
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06
Kellgren-Lawrence classification of knee OA
Grade 1
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Kellgren-Lawrence classification of knee OA
Grade 2
14 Participants17 Participants31 Participants
Kellgren-Lawrence classification of knee OA
Grade 3
13 Participants10 Participants23 Participants
NRS pain, medial4.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.32
4.00 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.21
4.16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants26 Participants54 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
34 Participants34 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants20 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
WOMAC function75.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.23
73.17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.06
74.45 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.62
WOMAC pain70.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.86
71.21 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.18
70.97 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Knee Adduction Moment

Change in magnitude of the more prominent peak in the knee adduction moment (KAM), a surrogate measure for medio-lateral load distribution in the knee, between baseline and week 52. A reduction in KAM indicates a shift in loading from the medial to the lateral compartment of the knee. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method for continuous variables.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gait Training; Altered Foot Progression AngleChange in Knee Adduction Moment-0.17 %Bodyweight*HeightStandard Deviation 0.47
Gait Training; Consistent Foot Progression AngleChange in Knee Adduction Moment0.08 %Bodyweight*HeightStandard Deviation 0.33
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.39, -0.13]Regression, Linear
Primary

Change in Medial Knee Pain

Change in medial knee pain between baseline and week 52 using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess average medial knee pain over the past 7 day period. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Change = (Week 52 score - Baseline score).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method for continuous variables.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gait Training; Altered Foot Progression AngleChange in Medial Knee Pain-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Gait Training; Consistent Foot Progression AngleChange in Medial Knee Pain-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Comparison: For the primary hypothesis that there would be a greater reduction in pain for the altered compared to the consistent FPA group, an effect size of 0.57 was assumed. To achieve 80% power with an alpha of 0.05, 39 participants per group were needed, so our recruitment goal was 40 subjects per group.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.9, -0.5]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Lateral T1rho Relaxation Time

Change in T1rho relaxation time measured from quantitative MRI in the lateral compartment of the knee between baseline and week 52. T1ρ relaxation time is sensitive to changes in proteoglycan content in the articular cartilage. Increased values of T1rho indicate increased depletion of proteoglycans and increased cartilage degeneration. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method for continuous variables.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gait Training; Altered Foot Progression AngleChange in Lateral T1rho Relaxation Time-1.11 msStandard Deviation 6.07
Gait Training; Consistent Foot Progression AngleChange in Lateral T1rho Relaxation Time-0.83 msStandard Deviation 6.8
p-value: 0.8595% CI: [-3.38, 2.8]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Lateral T2 Relaxation Time

Change in T2 relaxation time measured from quantitative MRI in the lateral compartment of the knee between baseline and week 52. T2 relaxation time is sensitive to changes in water content and collagen matrix integrity of the articular cartilage. Increased values of T2 indicate increased cartilage degeneration. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method for continuous variables.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gait Training; Altered Foot Progression AngleChange in Lateral T2 Relaxation Time-0.02 msStandard Deviation 2.14
Gait Training; Consistent Foot Progression AngleChange in Lateral T2 Relaxation Time-0.02 msStandard Deviation 1.88
p-value: 0.9995% CI: [-0.89, 0.9]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Medial T1rho Relaxation Time

Change in T1rho relaxation time measured from quantitative MRI in the medial compartment of the knee between baseline and week 52. T1ρ relaxation time is sensitive to changes in proteoglycan content in the articular cartilage. Increased values of T1rho indicate increased depletion of proteoglycans and increased cartilage degeneration. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method for continuous variables.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gait Training; Altered Foot Progression AngleChange in Medial T1rho Relaxation Time-1.72 msStandard Deviation 5.68
Gait Training; Consistent Foot Progression AngleChange in Medial T1rho Relaxation Time2.02 msStandard Deviation 5.53
p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-6.42, -1.05]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Medial T2 Relaxation Time

Change in T2 relaxation time measured from quantitative MRI in the medial compartment of the knee between baseline and week 52. T2 relaxation time is sensitive to changes in water content and collagen matrix integrity of the articular cartilage. Increased values of T2 indicate increased cartilage degeneration. Change = (Week 52 - Baseline).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method for continuous variables.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gait Training; Altered Foot Progression AngleChange in Medial T2 Relaxation Time-0.58 msStandard Deviation 2.65
Gait Training; Consistent Foot Progression AngleChange in Medial T2 Relaxation Time-0.52 msStandard Deviation 3.11
p-value: 0.9395% CI: [-1.42, 1.3]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026