Skip to content

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback: It's Role in Asthma Therapeutics

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback: It's Role in Asthma Therapeutics

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02766374
Acronym
BioAce
Enrollment
68
Registered
2016-05-09
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2019-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, Biofeedback, Heart rate variability biofeedback, Inhaled corticosteroids

Brief summary

The goal of this research study to see whether biofeedback therapy helps treat asthma, and if so, how it works. Biofeedback is a treatment method that can teach how to bodily control. Biofeedback is widely used to help people relax. In this study however, the investigators want to learn if a specific type of biofeedback actually improves asthma in a way that might allow the reduction or elimination of other controller treatments like inhaled-corticosteroids.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine the role of Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BF) in asthma management as either a controller (alternative) or bronchodilator (complementary) treatment, with respect to the current treatment of choice, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy, using different methods from participants that demonstrated clinically significant improvement in asthma outcomes in the investigator's previous research (1), and adding a second site not involved in the investigator's previous work. Inflammation of airways is viewed as the core pathophysiologic process in asthma. It is thought to render airways more reactive, and therefore, more susceptible to bronchoconstriction, leading to asthma exacerbations. Asthma is an episodic disease, where the goal of therapy is to reduce susceptibility to exacerbations, which may cause severe, even life-threatening illness. Anti-inflammatory medications reduce airways reactivity, while bronchodilator medications primarily relieve symptoms once an asthma exacerbation is in process, and may stop progressive constriction of airway smooth muscles (ASM). An anti-inflammatory effect of HRV-BF would have important implications for asthma management because adherence to ICS regimens is low due to a significant degree to feared side effects of prolonged steroid medication. Even if HRV-BF is found to only allow partial reduction in ICS requirements, this still would likely represent a major advance in asthma care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHeart rate variability biofeedback

Biofeedback teaches voluntary control of physiological functions by providing instantaneous feedback of variations in that bodily activity. Feedback usually is given in the form of visual and/or auditory signals derived from physiological recording devices. Among its salutary effects is a sense of medical self-efficacy, i.e., less dependency on medical professionals for maintaining personal health. The HRV-BF protocol we have developed and propose to examine herein works by a different pathway. It involves teaching the individual to increase the amplitude of heart rate accelerations during inhalation and de-celerations during exhalation, thus increasing the amplitude of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA).

BEHAVIORALPlacebo

The method consists of: 1) receiving EEG/music biofeedback (actually, a mildly relaxing intervention, using EEG biofeedback to alternately increase and decrease frontal/occipital EEG alpha rhythms while listening to relaxing music), and 2) listening to recorded sounds of nature along with relaxing music with instructions to maintain a condition of relaxed alertness. For home training, subjects will be given placebo StressEraser programmed to give feedback to maintain their breathing at baseline rate.

Sponsors

Rutgers University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Jewish Health
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Fred Wamboldt, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Mild to moderate persistent asthma for at least the past one year * Patients must not have taken oral or inhaled anti-inflammatory agents, including ICS and leukotriene inhibitors, for at least one month prior to study entry; and anti-IgE medications at least the past six months. Documented use of inhaled short-acting or long-acting β2-agonists during the month prior to study entry is, however, required. Xanthines, long-acting anticholinergics, and long-acting β2-agonists must be withdrawn within 72 hours upon entering the screening phase; short acting anticholinergics must be withdrawn within 48 hours before entering the screening phase. Patients will be required to abstain from these medications for the duration of study participation. * FEV1 values must be ≥60% of predicted normal values following a 6 hour albuterol withhold, and reversibility of FEV1 of at least 12% (equal to or greater than 200 cc) following up to four puffs of albuterol must occur; or asthma physician at study site must state based on medical history, exam, and spirometry data that patient has presumptive mild-moderate persistent asthma. * Lack of current asthma control as evidenced by ACT ≤ 19, or rescue use of B2-agonist ≥ 2/week within past 2 weeks, or waking due to asthma ≥ 1/week within past 2 weeks. * Patients must be non-smokers for at least the past year and have less than a 15 pack-year smoking history. This will minimize the risk of co-occurring COPD * Behavioral/linguistic competence: Ability to complete questionnaires and assessments in English * Patients must give informed consent prior to any study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of severe persistent asthma * 2 or more inpatient hospitalizations in the past year for asthma exacerbations; * History of only seasonal asthma * Patients with serious concomitant disease * Patients who have had a respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks of screening * Patients with a history of chronic bronchitis, COPD, or emphysema * Patients with a history of alcohol or drug abuse, or emotional or cognitive problems requiring psychotropic medication or likely to interfere procedural and treatment adherence * Any other clinically relevant deviation from normal in general medical history, physical examination, or laboratory parameters that would limit participation or interfere with study procedures and/or data collection; * Presence of exclusive extra-thoracic airway dysfunction * Women who are pregnant * Presence of a heart rhythm or other abnormality of heart rhythm on screening EKG that could preclude ac-curate HRV assessment * Chronically taking any medication likely to affect the autonomic or respiratory systems * Asthma therapy and concomitant medication * Previous participation in an investigational drug trial within 30 days prior to screening. * Concurrent participation in any other clinical trial or observational study at any time in the study. * Planning to move away from the area within the next 4 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Magnitude Change of Airway Reactivity Measured by Methacholine PC20FEV14-weeksChange in PEC20FEV1 measured after biofeedback from the PC20FEV1 measured at baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HRV Biofeedback
Biofeedback to maximaize heart rate variability. Procedure detailed in Lehrer, P. M., Vaschillo, B., Zucker, T., Graves, J., Katsamanis, M.,Aviles, M., & Wamboldt, F. S. (2013). Protocol for heart rate variability biofeedback training. Biofeedback, 41(3), 98-109.
35
EEG+ Biofeedback
Included instructions to increase and decrease EEG alpha from the right frontal to occipital areas (F4 to Oz), to listen regularly to relaxing music and to do paced breathing at the baseline rate of spontaneous breathing observed during a nondemanding task. Procedure detailed in Lehrer, P. M., Hochron, S. M., Mayne, T., Isenberg, S., Carlson, V., Lasoski, A. M., … Rausch, L. (1994). Relaxation and music therapies for asthma among patients prestabilized on asthma medication. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(1), 1-24.
33
Total68

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHRV BiofeedbackEEG+ BiofeedbackTotal
Age, Continuous38 years31 years34 years
Asthma Control Test (ACT) score total20 units on a scale20 units on a scale20 units on a scale
Baseline provocative conc causing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (PC20FEV1) (mg/ml)1.66 mg/ml1.40 mg/ml1.46 mg/ml
Body Mass Index (BMI)28.53 kg/m^227.41 kg/m^228.27 kg/m^2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants25 Participants56 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Exhaled Nitric Oxide cocentration (eNO) (ppb)35.0 parts per billion (p/b)43.0 parts per billion (p/b)40.5 parts per billion (p/b)
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec (FEV1) (L)2.79 Liters (L)3.01 Liters (L)2.89 Liters (L)
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (L)3.78 Liters (L)4.11 Liters (L)4.04 Liters (L)
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) (L/s)6.90 Liters/second (L/s)7.66 Liters/second (L/s)7.27 Liters/second (L/s)
Percent of Asthma Control Test (ACT) score ≤ 1918 Participants20 Participants38 Participants
Precent predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec (FEV1)86.7 Percent84.1 Percent85.9 Percent
Precent predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)102.2 Percent103.7 Percent103.0 Percent
Precent predicted Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)92.2 Percent92.6 Percent92.2 Percent
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants21 Participants38 Participants
Reported use of Short Acting Beta Adrenergic Medication (SABA) > 3/week3 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants23 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 33
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 33
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Magnitude Change of Airway Reactivity Measured by Methacholine PC20FEV1

Change in PEC20FEV1 measured after biofeedback from the PC20FEV1 measured at baseline

Time frame: 4-weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
HRV-BFMagnitude Change of Airway Reactivity Measured by Methacholine PC20FEV12.9782 mg/ml
PBO-BFMagnitude Change of Airway Reactivity Measured by Methacholine PC20FEV12.1181 mg/ml
p-value: >0.1GEE regression

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026