Skip to content

The Effect of Tongue Cleaning in Periodontitis Patients

The Effect of Tongue Scraping Compared to Tongue Cleaning on the Tongue Coating of Periodontitis Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02764060
Enrollment
18
Registered
2016-05-06
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2016-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontitis, Tongue Coating

Keywords

Periodontitis, Tongue coating, Tongue cleaning, Bacterial load

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to examine in periodontitis patients with visible tongue coating the changes in microbial load (aerobic and anaerobic) of the 14 day use of a tongue scraper versus the use of a regular toothbrush to clean the tongue.

Detailed description

Volatile sulphur compounds (VSC's) are the most important causes of bad breath. Since the micro-organisms that produce VSC's are also periodopathogens, intuitively, one would think that there is a positive correlation between VSC levels in exhaled breath and periodontitis. However, not all periodontitis patients have bad breath. A possible explanation can be a positive relationship between tongue coating an bad breath. In the past, tongue cleaning was already researched in an oral healthy population. This research aimed to examine in periodontitis patients with visible tongue coating the changes in microbial load (aerobic and anaerobic) of the 14 day use of a tongue scraper versus the use of a regular toothbrush to clean the tongue. Additionally changes in tongue coating; and patient perception about tongue cleaning was researched.

Interventions

The patients were instructed to start cleaning the tongue by two pulling strokes along the median sulcus of the tongue, followed by two pulling strokes along the lateral edges of the tongue.

The patients who were assigned to the tooth brush group were taught to perform three forward and backward strokes along the median sulcus and at each lateral part of the tongue.

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* systemically healthy patients * periodontitis patients

Exclusion criteria

* already using a tongue cleaning device * use of antibiotics the previous 6 months * rinsing with a chlorhexidine mouth rinse the past month * smokers * patients who underwent periodontal therapy the past three years were not included.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extension of the tongue coating14 daysExtension of the tongue coating measured according to Miyazaki (1995) and Winkel (2003).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bacterial load measured by culturing methods14 daysMicrobiological composition of the tongue coating.
Bacterial load measured by means of qPCR14 daysMicrobiological composition of the tongue coating.
Bacterial composition of unstimulated saliva (measured with the aid of culturing methods)14 daysMicrobiological composition of the saliva.
Bacterial composition of unstimulated saliva (measured with qPCR)14 daysMicrobiological composition of the saliva.
Experience of the subject of tongue coating related factors measured using a questionnaire14 daysExperience of the subject of the breath odour, taste perception; and cleanliness of the tongue.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026