Skip to content

Comparing a Randomised Controlled Intervention With Observational Data.

Comparing a Randomised Controlled Intervention With Observational Data.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02763501
Enrollment
10992
Registered
2016-05-05
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Morbid

Keywords

bariatric surgery, gastric bypass, intestinal obstruction, postoperative complication, methods, laparoscopy

Brief summary

Comparison of participants in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with observational data from patients operated in Sweden during the same period of time. The primary objective is to compare effects from a complex surgical intervention from RCT and observational data.

Detailed description

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) are golden standard for assessing interventions in medical science. Due to ethical or practical reasons, RCTs may however not always be feasible. The study objective was to test if the results from the RCT differ from observational data in a setting with a complex surgical intervention. Using the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry database we intend to compare patients operated with laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery within a register based RCT from May 1st 2010 until Nov 14th 2011, with all patients operated with the same procedure registered in the database during the same period of time. Primary end-point measures are severe complications within 30 days (safety outcome) and surgery for small bowel obstruction (efficacy outcome) within 4 years.

Interventions

PROCEDUREclosure of mesenteric defects

Closure of mesenteric defects by use of non-absorbable running sutures in RCT; and according to the choice of the surgeon in the non-RCT

PROCEDUREnon-closure of mesenteric defects

Mesenteric defects are left open

Sponsors

The Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Region Örebro County
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The same as acceptance criteria for bariatric surgery according to the 1991 NIH Consensus Statement

Exclusion criteria

* retrocolic gastric bypass procedure * previous bariatric procedures * primary open procedures * missing data on handling of the mesenteric defects

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
severe postoperative complications within 30 days30 daysSpecified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3b or more
reoperation for small bowel obstruction4 yearsEfficacy outcome: Number of participants with reoperation due to small bowel obstruction defined as acute symptoms of bowel obstruction with findings suggestive of small bowel obstruction during surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative length of stay30 days
length of the operationintraoperative
specific postoperative complications30 daysleakage or deep intra-abdominal infection, bleeding requiring intervention, small bowel obstruction/ileus, port-related complications, wound dehiscence, other wound complications (mainly superficial wound infections), anastomotic stricture, marginal ulcer, cardiovascular length of the operation event, pulmonary complication (other than pulmonary embolism), venous thromboembolism (including pulmonary embolism), urinary tract infection and other (in this case specified) complication
weight-loss at 2 years after surgery2 yearsspecified as excessive weight-loss (% excess weight loss = 100 x \[initial weight-postoperative weight\]/\[initial weight-weight corresponding to BMI 25 kg/m2\])

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026