Osteoarthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Shoulder arthroplasty, Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy, Subscapularis tenotomy
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of two different techniques used for subscapularis tendon repair during total shoulder replacement. The investigators hypothesize that participants who receive a newer repair technique called a lesser tuberosity osteotomy will have lower rates of postoperative subscapularis muscle dysfunction and rupture as compared to those who receive the traditional tenotomy repair.
Detailed description
The subscapularis tendon is mobilized during total shoulder arthroplasty in order to gain anterior access to the glenohumeral joint. Postoperative subscapularis dysfunction is being recognized more frequently and has been reported in \>65% of patients following shoulder arthroplasty with a soft-tissue repair. Subscapularis dysfunction has been associated with poor functional outcomes including tendon rupture and anterior instability, a major indication for revision surgery. Recent studies suggest that a standard subscapularis tenotomy with primary tendon repair may lead to failure of the repair and decreased functional outcomes as compared to a more novel lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique. The investigators study aims to validate the results of the current literature in a prospective randomized controlled trial, which to their knowledge has not been reported on this topic.Investigators will compare clinical outcomes following these two techniques during total shoulder arthroplasty. Participants undergoing total shoulder replacement will be randomized to receive either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or tenotomy with primary subscapularis tendon repair. All other procedures conducted in this study are considered standard of care except for ultrasounds, which are conducted for research purposes in the subscapularis tenotomy group. Postoperative outcomes will be monitored objectively and subjectively at routine postoperative office visits using physical exam, imaging (X-rays and ultrasounds), and questionnaires. If the hypothesis is proven to be true, the investigators will establish gold-standard evidence for the use of the newer osteotomy technique to improve patient satisfaction and mobility following shoulder arthroplasty.
Interventions
Standard procedure: Utilization of tenotomy for mobilization of subscapularis during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The subscapularis tendon is incised close to its attachment on the humerus. The Tendon is repaired with sutures.
Standard procedure: Utilization of the osteotomy to mobilize the subscapularis during TSA. A small fleck of bone is removed from humerus, the subscapularis tendon is still attached. The fleck of bone is reattached with sutures.
Standard procedure: Total shoulder arthroplasty replaces both components of the ball and socket joint with a metal device.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients already scheduled for total shoulder arthroplasty
Exclusion criteria
* Unable to provide information throughout postoperative recovery and attend subsequent office visits thereafter (a minimum of one year).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic Healing | Post operative at 1 year | Tendon healing/tuberosity union based on radiographs |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) | 1 year post-operatively | Pain indication measurement where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Mean score is reported without a range or standard deviation. |
| Forward Elevation (FE) Strength | 1 year post-operatively | Strength testing with Dynamometer in forward elevation was conducted to determine the mean in FE strength. |
| Total Intra-Operative Time | From incision time to time of complete skin closure | To be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team |
| Total Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes) | From glenoid implantation to completion of tendon or osteotomy repair | To be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team |
| External Rotation (ER) Strength | 1 year post-operatively | Strength testing with Dynamometer in external rotation. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tenotomy Subjects will receive shoulder prosthesis for subscapularis repair during TSA with tenotomy technique.
TSA with tenotomy technique: Standard procedure: Utilization of tenotomy for mobilization of subscapularis during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The subscapularis tendon is incised close to its attachment on the humerus. The Tendon is repaired with sutures.
Shoulder prosthesis: Standard procedure: Total shoulder arthroplasty replaces both components of the ball and socket joint with a metal device. | 30 |
| Osteotomy Subjects will receive shoulder prosthesis for subscapularis repair during TSA with lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique.
TSA with lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique: Standard procedure: Utilization of the osteotomy to mobilize the subscapularis during TSA. A small fleck of bone is removed from humerus, the subscapularis tendon is still attached. The fleck of bone is reattached with sutures.
Shoulder prosthesis: Standard procedure: Total shoulder arthroplasty replaces both components of the ball and socket joint with a metal device. | 30 |
| Total | 60 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tenotomy | Osteotomy | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 0-18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Customized At least 18 years old | 30 Participants | 30 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | — | — | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 30 | 0 / 30 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 30 | 5 / 30 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 30 | 0 / 30 |
Outcome results
Number of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic Healing
Tendon healing/tuberosity union based on radiographs
Time frame: Post operative at 1 year
Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tenotomy | Number of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic Healing | 26 Participants |
| Osteotomy | Number of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic Healing | 27 Participants |
External Rotation (ER) Strength
Strength testing with Dynamometer in external rotation.
Time frame: 1 year post-operatively
Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenotomy | External Rotation (ER) Strength | 50 degrees | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Osteotomy | External Rotation (ER) Strength | 52 degrees | Standard Deviation 3 |
Forward Elevation (FE) Strength
Strength testing with Dynamometer in forward elevation was conducted to determine the mean in FE strength.
Time frame: 1 year post-operatively
Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenotomy | Forward Elevation (FE) Strength | 153 degrees | Standard Deviation 7 |
| Osteotomy | Forward Elevation (FE) Strength | 150 degrees | Standard Deviation 6 |
Mean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS)
Pain indication measurement where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Mean score is reported without a range or standard deviation.
Time frame: 1 year post-operatively
Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tenotomy | Mean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) | 1.9 score on a scale |
| Osteotomy | Mean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) | 1.8 score on a scale |
Total Intra-Operative Time
To be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team
Time frame: From incision time to time of complete skin closure
Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tenotomy | Total Intra-Operative Time | 129.3 minutes |
| Osteotomy | Total Intra-Operative Time | 152.7 minutes |
Total Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes)
To be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team
Time frame: From glenoid implantation to completion of tendon or osteotomy repair
Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tenotomy | Total Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes) | 34.3 minutes |
| Osteotomy | Total Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes) | 39.3 minutes |