Skip to content

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for Subscapularis Repair

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Versus Tenotomy for Subscapularis Repair During Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02762903
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-05-05
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2024-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Shoulder arthroplasty, Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy, Subscapularis tenotomy

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of two different techniques used for subscapularis tendon repair during total shoulder replacement. The investigators hypothesize that participants who receive a newer repair technique called a lesser tuberosity osteotomy will have lower rates of postoperative subscapularis muscle dysfunction and rupture as compared to those who receive the traditional tenotomy repair.

Detailed description

The subscapularis tendon is mobilized during total shoulder arthroplasty in order to gain anterior access to the glenohumeral joint. Postoperative subscapularis dysfunction is being recognized more frequently and has been reported in \>65% of patients following shoulder arthroplasty with a soft-tissue repair. Subscapularis dysfunction has been associated with poor functional outcomes including tendon rupture and anterior instability, a major indication for revision surgery. Recent studies suggest that a standard subscapularis tenotomy with primary tendon repair may lead to failure of the repair and decreased functional outcomes as compared to a more novel lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique. The investigators study aims to validate the results of the current literature in a prospective randomized controlled trial, which to their knowledge has not been reported on this topic.Investigators will compare clinical outcomes following these two techniques during total shoulder arthroplasty. Participants undergoing total shoulder replacement will be randomized to receive either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or tenotomy with primary subscapularis tendon repair. All other procedures conducted in this study are considered standard of care except for ultrasounds, which are conducted for research purposes in the subscapularis tenotomy group. Postoperative outcomes will be monitored objectively and subjectively at routine postoperative office visits using physical exam, imaging (X-rays and ultrasounds), and questionnaires. If the hypothesis is proven to be true, the investigators will establish gold-standard evidence for the use of the newer osteotomy technique to improve patient satisfaction and mobility following shoulder arthroplasty.

Interventions

PROCEDURETSA with tenotomy technique

Standard procedure: Utilization of tenotomy for mobilization of subscapularis during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The subscapularis tendon is incised close to its attachment on the humerus. The Tendon is repaired with sutures.

PROCEDURETSA with lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique

Standard procedure: Utilization of the osteotomy to mobilize the subscapularis during TSA. A small fleck of bone is removed from humerus, the subscapularis tendon is still attached. The fleck of bone is reattached with sutures.

DEVICEShoulder prosthesis

Standard procedure: Total shoulder arthroplasty replaces both components of the ball and socket joint with a metal device.

Sponsors

Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients already scheduled for total shoulder arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide information throughout postoperative recovery and attend subsequent office visits thereafter (a minimum of one year).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic HealingPost operative at 1 yearTendon healing/tuberosity union based on radiographs

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS)1 year post-operativelyPain indication measurement where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Mean score is reported without a range or standard deviation.
Forward Elevation (FE) Strength1 year post-operativelyStrength testing with Dynamometer in forward elevation was conducted to determine the mean in FE strength.
Total Intra-Operative TimeFrom incision time to time of complete skin closureTo be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team
Total Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes)From glenoid implantation to completion of tendon or osteotomy repairTo be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team
External Rotation (ER) Strength1 year post-operativelyStrength testing with Dynamometer in external rotation.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tenotomy
Subjects will receive shoulder prosthesis for subscapularis repair during TSA with tenotomy technique. TSA with tenotomy technique: Standard procedure: Utilization of tenotomy for mobilization of subscapularis during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The subscapularis tendon is incised close to its attachment on the humerus. The Tendon is repaired with sutures. Shoulder prosthesis: Standard procedure: Total shoulder arthroplasty replaces both components of the ball and socket joint with a metal device.
30
Osteotomy
Subjects will receive shoulder prosthesis for subscapularis repair during TSA with lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique. TSA with lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique: Standard procedure: Utilization of the osteotomy to mobilize the subscapularis during TSA. A small fleck of bone is removed from humerus, the subscapularis tendon is still attached. The fleck of bone is reattached with sutures. Shoulder prosthesis: Standard procedure: Total shoulder arthroplasty replaces both components of the ball and socket joint with a metal device.
30
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTenotomyOsteotomyTotal
Age, Customized
0-18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
At least 18 years old
30 Participants30 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 305 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic Healing

Tendon healing/tuberosity union based on radiographs

Time frame: Post operative at 1 year

Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TenotomyNumber of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic Healing26 Participants
OsteotomyNumber of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic Healing27 Participants
Secondary

External Rotation (ER) Strength

Strength testing with Dynamometer in external rotation.

Time frame: 1 year post-operatively

Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TenotomyExternal Rotation (ER) Strength50 degreesStandard Deviation 2
OsteotomyExternal Rotation (ER) Strength52 degreesStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Forward Elevation (FE) Strength

Strength testing with Dynamometer in forward elevation was conducted to determine the mean in FE strength.

Time frame: 1 year post-operatively

Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TenotomyForward Elevation (FE) Strength153 degreesStandard Deviation 7
OsteotomyForward Elevation (FE) Strength150 degreesStandard Deviation 6
Secondary

Mean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS)

Pain indication measurement where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Mean score is reported without a range or standard deviation.

Time frame: 1 year post-operatively

Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TenotomyMean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS)1.9 score on a scale
OsteotomyMean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS)1.8 score on a scale
Secondary

Total Intra-Operative Time

To be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team

Time frame: From incision time to time of complete skin closure

Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TenotomyTotal Intra-Operative Time129.3 minutes
OsteotomyTotal Intra-Operative Time152.7 minutes
Secondary

Total Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes)

To be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team

Time frame: From glenoid implantation to completion of tendon or osteotomy repair

Population: Only includes participants who completed the final follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TenotomyTotal Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes)34.3 minutes
OsteotomyTotal Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes)39.3 minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026