Skip to content

Role of Uterine Manipulator in Hysterectomy - Ro.Man.HY

Role Of Uterine Manipulator in Hysterectomy for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02762214
Acronym
RoManHy
Enrollment
154
Registered
2016-05-04
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2016-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

Uterin manipulator, Endometrial Cancer, Laparoscopy, Robotic

Brief summary

Prospective multicentric randomized trial to evaluate the role of uterine manipulator on laparoscopic/robotic total hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage G1 - G2 endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics - FIGO stages IA-IB).

Detailed description

This multicentric prospective randomized Phase III trial is aimed to verify if the use of uterine manipulator for laparoscopic/robotic treatment of early stage endometrial cancer can influence the impact of peritoneal cytology and lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) and the outcomes in terms of perioperative and oncological (disease free survival - DFS, overall survival - OS) outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEClermont-Ferrand Uterine Manipulator

Pelvic cytology is obtained before starting surgical procedures (washing number 1). After tubal coagulation, Clermont-Ferrand Uterine Manipulator is installed inside the uterus. At the end of the hysterectomy, after colporrhaphy, a second cytology is obtained (washing number 2)

OTHERNo uterine Manipulator

Pelvic cytology is obtained before starting surgical procedures (washing number 1). None uterine manipulator is used and the cervix is closed with a cross stitch. Tubal coagulation, At the end of the hysterectomy, after colporrhaphy, a second cytology is obtained (washing number 2)

Sponsors

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For patients * Age \> 18 \< 80 years * Patient's informed consent * American Society of Anesthesiologists: \< class III or IV * No actual pregnancies * Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 35 For diseases * Early stage endometrial cancer (IA-IB) * Endometrioid histotype (G1-G2)

Exclusion criteria

For patients * Age \> 18 \< 80 * Actual pregnancies * Previous gynecological cancer For disease * Type II endometrial cancer histotype * Grade 3 endometrial cancer * Advanced stage endometrial cancer (II - IV) * Previous radiotherapy on the pelvic field * Uterine size larger than conform 12 weeks gestation or 9 cm in horizontal * Necessity of laparotomic procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upstaging rate30 daysEvaluation of Lymphovascular space invasion and pre- / post-Hysterectomy pelvic cytology in order to investigate if the use of uterine manipulator has a role in upstaging of early-stage endometrial cancer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complicationswithin 30 days from surgeryTo measure intra- and postoperative complication rate in order to investigate the specific role of uterine manipulator in complication occurred during hysterectomy or within 30 days after.
Blood LossIntraoperativeTo measure intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) in order to investigate the specific role of uterine manipulator in hemostatic control during Hysterectomy safety of laparoscopic hysterectomy
Impact of surgical procedurePerioperativeTo measure the specific role of uterine manipulator in impact on surgery. More in dept operative time (OT), ileus, discharge time will be respectively measured in minutes, hours and days.
Impact on postoperative painPostoperativeTo investigate if the use or not of uterine manipulator could have a role in postoperative pain. Visual Analog Score (VAS) will be used to evaluate it.
Oncological Outcomes: Rate of local relapses1 years - 5 yearsTo investigate if the use or not of uterine manipulator could determine an higher rate of local relapses
Role of uterine manipulator in ObesityIntraoperativeTo determine the specific correlations between the use or not of uterine manipulator and Body Mass Index (BMI measured in kg/m2). To investigate if even this issue could influence the intraoperative safety

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026