Patients With Mental Confusion
Conditions
Brief summary
Validity and Reliability of French Version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (psychometric validation study after translation/back translation process assessed by the original team : W.Ely, MD, Ph.D, Vanderbilt University)
Interventions
Neuropsychological testing
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult, \> or equal to 18-yr * Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) \> or equal -3 * Francophone
Exclusion criteria
* Diagnostic of cognitive disorders * Admission for brain injury * Psychotic disorders * Diagnostic of cognitive disorders * Visual or auditory impairments
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statistical criteria of performance (sensibility, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value) of Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) compared to gold standard (neuropsychologist). | Day 0 | Investigators team: evaluation by the CAM- ICU in French and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Check list (ICDSC) during 2 minutes for the concomitant CAM- ICU and ICDSC , carried out at 30 minutes intervals by two Clinical Research Nurse of the investigative team . The neuropsychologist will do the evaluation according to criteria common DSM5. Neuropsychologists now used DSM 5 criteria to diagnose delirium at our institution since new DSM 5 criteria have been published in French. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-rater reliability, comparison to Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist and standard bedside practices | Day 0 | Statistics ICDSC criteria will be assessed against the Gold Standard . The reproducibility of the CAM- ICU and ICDSC will be evaluated according to different inter-observer. |
Countries
France