Suicide
Conditions
Keywords
Suicide prevention, Jail
Brief summary
The four year SPIRIT Trial, or Suicide Prevention Intervention for at-Risk Individuals in Transition, will recruit 800 pretrial jail detainees at risk for suicide. Each participant will be randomly assigned to today's standard care or to Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) method and then followed for one year after release. Outcomes include suicide events, suicide attempts and ideation, psychiatric symptoms, functioning, treatment utilization, problem-solving, belongingness, and cost-effectiveness.
Detailed description
There were nearly 12 million admissions to US jails in 2012. Jailed individuals face a disproportionate risk for suicide. The time of arrest and jail detention represents an acute stressor that further exacerbates this risk. The epidemic of suicide during jail detention has been recognized. However, less attention has been paid to the high suicide risk and mortality in the months following jail release, as individuals re-enter their communities, are faced with financial, legal, and social stressors, and have increased access to lethal means (e.g., drugs, cars, firearms). Given that roughly 10% of all suicides in the U.S. with known circumstances occur following a recent criminal legal stressor (often arrest and jail detention), reducing suicide risk in the year after jail detention could have a noticeable impact on national suicide rates. Unlike prison, where individuals have already been sentenced and typically stay from months to years, most pretrial jail detainees are released within days. Therefore, brief interventions are required. Stanley and Brown's Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a brief, adjunctive suicide risk reduction intervention developed for suicidal patients presenting to urgent care settings. SPI incorporates evidence-based suicide risk reduction strategies in a low intensity, low cost intervention that can be delivered by a broad range of clinicians, making it scalable in the mental health resource-poor justice system. SPI reduces subsequent suicidal ideation and attempts among at-risk individuals in emergency rooms. However, there is no previous test of this intervention (or any other) for reducing suicidality following jail release. This RCT evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SPI for reducing suicide events (attempts, suicide behaviors, and suicide-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits) and attempts among 800 suicidal pretrial jail detainees from two jails in the year following jail release. It assesses critical mechanisms of suicide reduction in our target population: treatment utilization, suicide-related problem-solving, and belongingness. SPI will consist of safety planning during jail detention and follow-up phone sessions after jail release. Research with previously incarcerated individuals and with suicidal individuals in the community has shown that telephone follow-up intervention is feasible and powerful in building trust and reducing risk among these disenfranchised, isolated populations. This study will be the first randomized evaluation of a suicide prevention intervention in the vulnerable year after jail release. Beyond the human suffering and costs at an individual level, suicidal behavior incurs high economic costs in terms of health care costs and lost productivity. Jails are a catchment area for at-risk individuals at a time of high life stress and high suicide risk, providing an important opportunity for suicide prevention intervention, one that is currently being missed. This study will provide the data on costs and cost-adjusted outcomes that systems need to make informed decisions about adoption, speeding implementation. Thus, this study will contribute to knowledge about both mechanisms of action and system-level intervention effects.
Interventions
Brown and Stanley's Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a brief, adjunctive intervention designed to reduce subsequent suicidal behavior in high-risk populations. The core element of SPI is the collaborative development of the Safety Plan, which is a prioritized written list of coping strategies and supports that individuals can use during or preceding suicidal crises. In this study, safety planning will occur during pretrial jail detention, with telephone follow-up in the community to conduct risk assessment, review the Safety Plan, problem-solve obstacles to treatment, and assist with linkage to services.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Unsentenced male and female pretrial jail detainees * 18+ years of age * at risk for suicide, operationalized as a response of yes on item 4 or greater on the initial 5 C-SSRS screening questions, indicating the presence of at least some active suicide ideation with some intent to act in the past month (i.e., individuals at higher risk, such as those who report intent with specific plan and/or suicide attempt/s in the last month, will also be included); * speak and understand English well enough to understand questionnaires when they are read aloud.
Exclusion criteria
* expects to be sentenced and serve their sentence before being released to the community * cannot provide the name and contact information of at least two locator persons * does not have access to any telephone.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Suicide Events | One year after jail release | Number of suicide events (a composite of attempts, behaviors, suicide-related hospitalizations, and suicide deaths) in the year following jail release. Events are identified through self-report, hospital records, and death records. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks of Active Suicide Ideation | One year after release from jail | Operationalized using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation (LIFE) |
| Severity of Suicide Ideation | Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported. | Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Suicide Intensity Subscale score. Subscale scores range from 2 to 25, higher scores indicating more intense suicidal ideation. |
| Time to First Suicide Event | One year after release from jail | — |
| Psychiatric Symptoms | Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported. | NIH's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Cross-Cutting Measure total score. Scores range from 0 to 92, higher scores reflecting greater severity of psychiatric symptoms. |
| Suicide Attempts | One year after release from jail | Number of suicide attempts using the Columbia (C-SSRS) criteria. |
| Treatment Utilization | Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported. | Number of outpatient mental health and substance use visits attended |
| Suicide-related Problem-solving | Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported. | Suicide-Related Coping Scale total score. Scores range from 0-68, higher scores indicating better suicide related coping. |
| Belongingness | Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported. | Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-12 (INQ-12) belongingness subscale score. Scores range from 0-54, higher scores indicating higher levels of thwarted belongingness. |
| Functioning | Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported. | Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) total score. Scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating greater functioning. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention Brown and Stanley's Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a brief, adjunctive intervention designed to reduce subsequent suicidal behavior in high-risk populations. The core element of SPI is the collaborative development of the Safety Plan, which is a prioritized written list of coping strategies and supports that individuals can use during or preceding suicidal crises. In this study, safety planning will occur during pretrial jail detention, with telephone follow-up in the community to conduct risk assessment, review the Safety Plan, problem-solve obstacles to treatment, and assist with linkage to services.
Safety Planning Intervention: Brown and Stanley's Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a brief, adjunctive intervention designed to reduce subsequent suicidal behavior in high-risk populations. The core element of SPI is the collaborative development of the Safety Plan, which is a prioritized written list of coping strategies and supports that individuals can use during or preceding suicidal crises. In this study, safety planning will occur during pretrial jail detention, with telephone follow-up in the community to conduct risk assessment, review the Safety Plan, problem-solve obstacles to treatment, and assist with linkage to services. | 342 |
| Standard Care Standard Care for pretrial jail detainees is assessment of risk and stabilization to the extent possible during their jail detention. No post-release community follow-up is typically provided. This study will augment standard care with regular assessment and emergency referral post-release, as well as provision of a list of community resources. | 313 |
| Total | 655 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Safety Planning Intervention | Standard Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 32.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 | 33.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 | 33 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized All other groups and not-specified | 45 Participants | 32 Participants | 77 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaskan Native | 39 Participants | 32 Participants | 71 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 83 Participants | 76 Participants | 159 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic Ethnicity | 49 Participants | 38 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Non-Hispanic Ethnicity | 293 Participants | 275 Participants | 568 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 175 Participants | 173 Participants | 348 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 98 Participants | 84 Participants | 182 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 244 Participants | 229 Participants | 473 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 12 / 342 | 4 / 313 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 70 / 342 | 69 / 313 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 177 / 342 | 159 / 313 |
Outcome results
Suicide Events
Number of suicide events (a composite of attempts, behaviors, suicide-related hospitalizations, and suicide deaths) in the year following jail release. Events are identified through self-report, hospital records, and death records.
Time frame: One year after jail release
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Suicide Events | 1.8 number of events | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Standard Care | Suicide Events | 3.0 number of events | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
Belongingness
Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-12 (INQ-12) belongingness subscale score. Scores range from 0-54, higher scores indicating higher levels of thwarted belongingness.
Time frame: Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Belongingness | 19.90 score on a subscale | Standard Error 0.77 |
| Standard Care | Belongingness | 20.08 score on a subscale | Standard Error 0.81 |
Functioning
Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) total score. Scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating greater functioning.
Time frame: Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Functioning | 72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
| Standard Care | Functioning | 72.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
Psychiatric Symptoms
NIH's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Cross-Cutting Measure total score. Scores range from 0 to 92, higher scores reflecting greater severity of psychiatric symptoms.
Time frame: Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Psychiatric Symptoms | 44.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Standard Care | Psychiatric Symptoms | 45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
Severity of Suicide Ideation
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Suicide Intensity Subscale score. Subscale scores range from 2 to 25, higher scores indicating more intense suicidal ideation.
Time frame: Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Severity of Suicide Ideation | 15.2 score on a subscale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Standard Care | Severity of Suicide Ideation | 16.2 score on a subscale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
Suicide Attempts
Number of suicide attempts using the Columbia (C-SSRS) criteria.
Time frame: One year after release from jail
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Suicide Attempts | 1 Number of attempts | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Standard Care | Suicide Attempts | 2.1 Number of attempts | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
Suicide-related Problem-solving
Suicide-Related Coping Scale total score. Scores range from 0-68, higher scores indicating better suicide related coping.
Time frame: Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Suicide-related Problem-solving | 65.82 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.66 |
| Standard Care | Suicide-related Problem-solving | 65.39 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.69 |
Time to First Suicide Event
Time frame: One year after release from jail
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Time to First Suicide Event | 7.4 weeks | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Standard Care | Time to First Suicide Event | 4.4 weeks | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
Treatment Utilization
Number of outpatient mental health and substance use visits attended
Time frame: Assessed 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after release from jail, 12 months reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Treatment Utilization | 9.02 number of visits | Standard Error 0.88 |
| Standard Care | Treatment Utilization | 8.41 number of visits | Standard Error 0.86 |
Weeks of Active Suicide Ideation
Operationalized using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation (LIFE)
Time frame: One year after release from jail
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Planning Intervention | Weeks of Active Suicide Ideation | 9 weeks | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Standard Care | Weeks of Active Suicide Ideation | 10.9 weeks | Standard Deviation 13.1 |