Skip to content

Tuberculosis Research of INA-RESPOND On Drug Resistance

Tuberculosis Research of INA-RESPOND On Drug Resistance

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02758236
Acronym
TRIPOD
Enrollment
490
Registered
2016-05-02
Start date
2017-02-13
Completion date
2021-04-26
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Tuberculosis, MDR TB

Brief summary

This study is a prospective observational cohort study of TB patients who are treated or evaluated at 10 study sites. Patients presenting with cough for 2 weeks or longer with at least one additional TB symptom and a chest X-ray suggestive of TB, will be invited to be enrolled in the study. The signed informed consent will designate their willingness to participate on this study.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective observational cohort study of TB patients who are treated or evaluated at 10 study sites. Patients presenting with cough for 2 weeks or longer with at least one additional TB symptom and a chest X-ray suggestive of TB, will be invited to be enrolled in the study. The signed informed consent will designate their willingness to participate on this study. Enrolled subjects will produce the sputum for bacteriological examination of M. tuberculosis by AFB, culture and Xpert. The sputum will also be tested by Xpert for drug resistance test. If the culture is positive, conventional DST will be performed, and M. tuberculosis isolates will be stored for spoligotyping and for future research on TB. All bacteriologicaly confirmed subjects will be followed for outcome assessment. For all enrolled subjects chest X-ray results, demographic data, TB co-morbidities, symptoms, nutritional status, treatment regimens, compliance and outcome will be collected. In addition, sputum, blood and urine will also be collected for storage. To estimate the proportion of MDR-TB amongst new and previously treated TB cases. 1. To evaluate accuracy of clinical diagnosis by comparing clinically defined TB to laboratory confirmed TB. 2. To compare AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF as TB diagnostic tests against culture result. 3. To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF in detecting Rif susceptibility against DST. 4. To estimate the proportion of cured, completed, failed, died and lost to follow up as treatment outcomes on DS-TB and DR-TB cases 5. To evaluate the association of treatment success (cured or completed) with the following data: 1. Demographics (age, sex) 2. TB contact history 3. Smoking habit 4. Treatment seeking behavior 5. Co-morbidities (HIV, DM) 6. Primary and secondary drug resistance 7. Symptoms 8. Cavitary disease 9. Nutritional status 10. Treatment regimens 11. Patient reported compliance 12. Numbers of bacteria by AFB test 13. TB strains (e.g Beijing)

Interventions

OTHERNo Intervention

No Intervention

Sponsors

National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
Ina-Respond
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients suspected of having pulmonary TB * Cough ≥ 2 weeks * At least one other TB clinical symptom * Fever * Unexplained weight loss * Loss of appetite * Hemoptysis * Shortness of breath * Chest pain * Night sweats * Fatigue * Suggestive TB on chest x-ray based on pulmonologist or internist consultant of pulmonology opinion * Age ≥ 18 years' old * Willing to be treated or evaluated at study site * Willing to have specimens stored for use in future studies * Patient denies having TB treatment for more than 7 days in the last 1 month (30 days).

Exclusion criteria

Pregnancy or any serious condition includes, but not limited to, liver disease, chronic kidney disease, and psychiatric illness that might interfere with study compliance (based on the clinician judgment).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of MDR TB Cases Amongst New TB Cases and Previously Treated TB Cases2 months after enrollmentAFB smear and GeneXpert were performed at the microbiology laboratory of the study site. Culture and drug susceptibility tests were conducted at appointed National TB Program Reference Laboratories.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Factors for Treatment Success.12-30 monthsProtective factors were collected by interview with the subjects. 237 subjects with confirmed bacteriologically and cured or complete treatment were analyzed for this outcome.
Factors of Treatment Interruption.12-30 monthsRisk factors of treatment interruption were collected by interview with the subject. 91 subjects were defined as lost to follow-up or treatment failure or died and analyzed for this outcome.
Number of Participants Who Were Cured, Failed, Died, Treatment Completion, and Lost to Follow-up12- 30 monthsFrom 447 subjects with all sputum examination results, only 328 subjects confirmed by bacteriology and the treatment outcome were categorized as followed: 1. Cured 2. Failed 3. Died 4. Treatment completion 5. Lost to follow up
The Performance of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF12-30 monthsAssess the sensitivity and specificity of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF to culture as gold standard. 312 subjects had positive sputum culture were used for evaluation of sensitivity. Meanwhile, 99 subjects that had no bacterial evidence of MTB infection (AFB, culture, and Xpert negative) and 36 subjects that were only AFB and/or Xpert MTB/RIF positive were used to evaluate the specificity. In total 135 subjects were analyzed to evaluate the specificity.
The Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF12-30 monthsAssess the performance of Rifampicin susceptibility results in Xpert MTB/RIF against result in drug susceptible test (DST) as gold standard. 312 subjects had positive sputum culture were used to assess the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF. 196 subjects were sensitive to Rif in Xpert MTB/RIF. While 116 subjects had resistant to Rif in Xpert MTB/RIF.
TB Case Category12-30 monthsTB category was defined as clinically TB or bacteriologically confirmed TB. 447 subjects with sputum examination were analyzed for this outcome.

Countries

Indonesia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment period was from February 2017 through November 2018. The study was done at 7 hospitals in Indonesia.

Pre-assignment details

From total target 1357 subjects, only achieved 490 subjects enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Presumptive TB
TB patients with cough for 2 weeks or longer with at least one additional TB symptom and a chest x-ray suggestive of TB.
447
Total447

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyInvestigator discretion43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPresumptive TB
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
426 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
447 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
447 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
173 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
274 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
65 / 447
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 447
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 447

Outcome results

Primary

Number of MDR TB Cases Amongst New TB Cases and Previously Treated TB Cases

AFB smear and GeneXpert were performed at the microbiology laboratory of the study site. Culture and drug susceptibility tests were conducted at appointed National TB Program Reference Laboratories.

Time frame: 2 months after enrollment

Population: TB cases with bacteriologically confirmed TB with positive MTB culture

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesNumber of MDR TB Cases Amongst New TB Cases and Previously Treated TB Cases23 Participants
MDR TB Amongst Previously Treated TB CasesNumber of MDR TB Cases Amongst New TB Cases and Previously Treated TB Cases64 Participants
Secondary

Factors for Treatment Success.

Protective factors were collected by interview with the subjects. 237 subjects with confirmed bacteriologically and cured or complete treatment were analyzed for this outcome.

Time frame: 12-30 months

Population: Treatment success was defined as cured or complete treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors for Treatment Success.Males143 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors for Treatment Success.Non-Smoking Group204 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors for Treatment Success.Normal/overweight (BMI>=18)125 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors for Treatment Success.New TB cases146 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors for Treatment Success.Lung lesion in CXR > 2 zones175 Participants
Secondary

Factors of Treatment Interruption.

Risk factors of treatment interruption were collected by interview with the subject. 91 subjects were defined as lost to follow-up or treatment failure or died and analyzed for this outcome.

Time frame: 12-30 months

Population: Risk factors of treatment interruption were collected by interview with the subject. 91 subjects were defined as lost to follow-up or treatment failure or died and analyzed for this outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors of Treatment Interruption.Previously treated54 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors of Treatment Interruption.Lung lesion in CXR >2 zones75 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors of Treatment Interruption.Male group56 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors of Treatment Interruption.Non-smoking group81 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesFactors of Treatment Interruption.Underweight (BMI<18)51 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Were Cured, Failed, Died, Treatment Completion, and Lost to Follow-up

From 447 subjects with all sputum examination results, only 328 subjects confirmed by bacteriology and the treatment outcome were categorized as followed: 1. Cured 2. Failed 3. Died 4. Treatment completion 5. Lost to follow up

Time frame: 12- 30 months

Population: The proportion of treatment outcomes from all subjects with bacteriologically confirmed (n=328 subjects)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesNumber of Participants Who Were Cured, Failed, Died, Treatment Completion, and Lost to Follow-upCured222 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesNumber of Participants Who Were Cured, Failed, Died, Treatment Completion, and Lost to Follow-upFailed12 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesNumber of Participants Who Were Cured, Failed, Died, Treatment Completion, and Lost to Follow-upDied31 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesNumber of Participants Who Were Cured, Failed, Died, Treatment Completion, and Lost to Follow-upTreatment complete15 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesNumber of Participants Who Were Cured, Failed, Died, Treatment Completion, and Lost to Follow-upTreatment lost to follow-up48 Participants
Secondary

TB Case Category

TB category was defined as clinically TB or bacteriologically confirmed TB. 447 subjects with sputum examination were analyzed for this outcome.

Time frame: 12-30 months

Population: TB category was defined as clinically TB or bacteriologically confirmed TB. 447 subjects with sputum examination were analyzed for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesTB Case Category99 Participants
MDR TB Amongst Previously Treated TB CasesTB Case Category348 Participants
Secondary

The Performance of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF

Assess the sensitivity and specificity of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF to culture as gold standard. 312 subjects had positive sputum culture were used for evaluation of sensitivity. Meanwhile, 99 subjects that had no bacterial evidence of MTB infection (AFB, culture, and Xpert negative) and 36 subjects that were only AFB and/or Xpert MTB/RIF positive were used to evaluate the specificity. In total 135 subjects were analyzed to evaluate the specificity.

Time frame: 12-30 months

Population: Assess the sensitivity and specificity of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF to culture as gold standard.~312 subjects had positive sputum culture were used for evaluation of sensitivity. Meanwhile, 99 subjects that had no bacterial evidence of MTB infection (AFB, culture, and Xpert negative) and 36 subjects that were only AFB and/or Xpert MTB/RIF positive were used to evaluate the specificity. In total 135 subjects were analyzed to evaluate the specificity.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesThe Performance of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF269 Participants
MDR TB Amongst Previously Treated TB CasesThe Performance of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF117 Participants
Sensitivity Xpert MTB/RIFThe Performance of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF304 Participants
Specificity Xpert MTB/RIFThe Performance of AFB and Xpert MTB/RIF99 Participants
Secondary

The Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF

Assess the performance of Rifampicin susceptibility results in Xpert MTB/RIF against result in drug susceptible test (DST) as gold standard. 312 subjects had positive sputum culture were used to assess the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF. 196 subjects were sensitive to Rif in Xpert MTB/RIF. While 116 subjects had resistant to Rif in Xpert MTB/RIF.

Time frame: 12-30 months

Population: Assess the performance of Rifampicin susceptibility results in Xpert MTB/RIF against result in drug susceptible test (DST) as gold standard.~312 subjects had positive sputum culture were used to assess the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF.~196 subjects were sensitive to Rif in Xpert MTB/RIF. While 116 subjects had resistant to Rif in Xpert MTB/RIF.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesThe Performance of Xpert MTB/RIFXpert negative6 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesThe Performance of Xpert MTB/RIFXpert sensitive165 Participants
MDR TB Amongst New TB CasesThe Performance of Xpert MTB/RIFXpert resistant25 Participants
MDR TB Amongst Previously Treated TB CasesThe Performance of Xpert MTB/RIFXpert negative2 Participants
MDR TB Amongst Previously Treated TB CasesThe Performance of Xpert MTB/RIFXpert sensitive2 Participants
MDR TB Amongst Previously Treated TB CasesThe Performance of Xpert MTB/RIFXpert resistant112 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026