Prostatic Hyperplasia
Conditions
Keywords
Screening tool, International Prostate Symptom Score, Lower urinary tract symptoms, BPO, BPE, Benign prostatic enlargement, Benign prostatic obstruction, LUTS, Benign prostatic hyperplasia, IPSS, BPH
Brief summary
This non-randomized, interventional study will be conducted in a general practice setting to assess the utility of a benign prostatic enlargement (BPE)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) screening tool in conjunction with prostate specific antigen (PSA) in finding men confirmed to have BPH on full urologist assessment of diagnostic test results. The tool may help a General Practitioners (GP) to identify subjects who may have BPH for further tests and improve the speed of referrals to specialists when this is appropriate. The utility of the screening tool will be compared to the validated tool in wide clinical use, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). This study does not have any formal hypothesis in terms of the primary and secondary endpoint proportions. A BPE/BPO screening tool identifies lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) probably due to BPH in men not yet presenting with LUTS. The results of this screening tool will be used for further investigation. All subjects testing positive on the BPE/BPO screening tool (score \>=3) tool or on the IPSS (score \>=8) will be enrolled and offered a PSA test and urinalysis to establish a diagnosis of probable BPH (Part I-Visit 1). The GP may perform a digital rectal examination (DRE) which will be repeated by the urologist to confirm the diagnosis and to rule out an abnormality suggesting prostate cancer. The GP will make a diagnosis of probable BPH based upon screening results and lab tests which suggest that they are related to BPH and not other causes of such symptoms. The GP will phone the subject to report yes or no for probable BPH Part II (Visit 2). If the subject has probable BPH, the GP will schedule the subject for Visit 3 with an urologist. If the subject does not have probable BPH, then it will be considered that the subject has completed the study. Subjects that proceed to Part II (Visit 3) will be scheduled for a urology assessment performed by an urologist. This assessment includes a DRE and a brief physical exam and review of the PSA test, for a confirmatory diagnosis of BPH and estimation of risk of progression of BPH. Approximately 1,500 subjects presenting to a GP for reasons unrelated to this study will be screened for probable BPH to yield 500 subjects being referred to an urologist. The duration of the study will be 1 week (+/- 4 days) and up to 6 weeks to allow for GP and urologist visit scheduling.
Interventions
OTHERBenign prostatic enlargement (BPE)/Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) screening tool
The BPE/BPO screening tool has been developed using the currently recommended Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 guidelines for developing patient-completed questionnaires such as Patient Reported Outcomes. The tool to be used in this study in the General Practice setting has undergone validation in a urology setting to demonstrate the validity of the tool in populations with and without a definite diagnosis of BPH. Subjects who have a positive score on the BPE/BPO screening tool (total score \>=3) and meet all other eligibility requirements will be enrolled in Part I of the study.
OTHERInternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) screening tool
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score is a validated tool to assess the severity of LUTS symptoms, and has similarly been used for assessing symptomatic efficacy of treatments for BPH. Subjects who have a positive score on the IPSS tool (score \>=8) and meet all other eligibility requirements will be enrolled in Part I of the study.
Sponsors
GlaxoSmithKline
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form. * Male. * Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and protocol. * Present in a General Practice setting for a reason unrelated to this study. * Positive IPSS score \>=8 and/or positive BPE/BPO screening tool score \>=3.
Exclusion criteria
* History of BPH for which they have received test procedures, medical intervention and/or medicine. * History of prostate-related LUTS for which they have received test procedures, medical intervention and/or medicine. * History of prostatic surgery (including transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), balloon dilatation, thermotherapy, and/or stent replacement) or other invasive or minimally invasive procedures to treat BPH. * Has other conditions that may cause urinary symptoms (e.g., neurogenic bladder, bladder neck contracture, urethral stricture, bladder malignancy, acute or chronic prostatitis, or acute or chronic urinary tract infections, etc.). * History or evidence of prostate cancer (e.g., positive biopsy or ultrasound, suspicious DRE and/or rising PSA). * Current or prior use of the following: 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (finasteride or dutasteride); anti-cholinergics (e.g. oxybutynin, propantheline, tolterodine, solifenacin, darifenacin, mirabegron) alpha-adrenoreceptor blockers (i.e., indoramin, prazosin, terazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin, doxazosin and silodosin), herbal products for urinary symptoms; Use of any investigational study drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug in question, (whichever is longer), preceding the first study visit. * Use within previous 30 days at Visit 1 of: phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE-5) inhibitors for erectile dysfunction; anabolic steroids
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Men With Confirmed Diagnosis of BPH | Up to 6 weeks | Confirmed diagnosis of BPH was based on full urologist diagnostic testing with a positive result on the BPE/BPO screening tool (score \>=3) and serum PSA \>=2 ng/mL. The BPE/BPO questionnaire consists of three questions each with a score ranging from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. Participants with probable BPH underwent full urologist diagnostic testing, which included review of medical history, symptoms and previous tests, brief physical examination, Digital rectal examination (DRE). Proportion of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with a positive result on the BPE/BPO screening tool (Score \>= 3) and a diagnosis of BPH by the urologist (Numerator) by number of participants with a positive result on the BPE/BPO screening tool (Score \>= 3) and a BPH assessment by the urologist (Denominator). 95% confidence interval on the proportion was calculated by using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Men That Are Confirmed to Have BPH Based on Full Urologist Assessment of Diagnostic Test Results Among Men With a Positive Result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Up to 6 weeks | Confirmed diagnosis of BPH was based on full urologist diagnostic testing with a positive result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, BPE/BPO or IPSS screening tools and serum PSA \>=2 ng/mL. The BPE/BPO questionnaire consists of three questions each with a score ranging from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. IPSS tool is used to assess the severity of LUTS symptoms with a score ranging from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. Participants with probable BPH underwent full urologist diagnostic testing, which included review of medical history, symptoms and previous tests, brief physical examination, DRE. Proportion of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and a diagnosis of BPH by the urologist (Numerator) by number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and a BPH assessment by the urologist(Denominator). |
| Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Up to 6 weeks | Confirmed risk for BPH was based on full urologist diagnostic testing with a positive result on the BPE/BPO and/or IPSS screening tool and probable GP BPH diagnosis. The BPE/BPO questionnaire consists of 3 questions each with a score from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. IPSS tool is used to assess the severity of LUTS symptoms with a score from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. Participants with probable BPH underwent full urologist diagnostic testing, which included review of medical history, symptoms and previous tests, physical examination, DRE. Participants with PSA \>=2.0 ng/mL and other tests were considered as at risk for BPH. Proportion of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and diagnosis of BPH progression risk (Numerator) by number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and a BPH progression risk assessment by the urologist (Denominator). |
| Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Up to 6 weeks | Diagnosis of probable BPH was based on GP assessment among men with a positive result on the BPE/BPO and/or IPSS screening tool. The BPE/BPO questionnaire consists of 3 questions each with a score from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. IPSS tool is used to assess the severity of LUTS symptoms with a score from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. Probable BPH is the presumptive diagnosis of urinary tract obstruction from an enlarged prostate based on clinical symptoms and findings where urinary symptoms are not apparently related to any other cause. Participants underwent GP assessment and lab result review by GP. Participants with PSA \>=2 ng/mL were assessed for probable BPH. Proportion of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and diagnosis of probable BPH (Numerator) by number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and a BPH assessment by GP (Denominator). |
| Summary of Agreement Between BPE/BPO and IPSS Screening Tools | Day 1 | Agreement between the IPSS and BPE/BPO tools had to utilize the screened population, as the evaluable population did not include any participants with IPSS \<8 and BPE/BPO\<3. All screened participants with IPSS and BPE/BPO results were utilized (2327 of the 2343 participants had IPSS and BPE/PO results). There were 16 participants (2343 minus 2327) in the screened population without IPSS and BPE/BPO results, and hence were not included in the calculation of the Kappa statistic. Kappa statistic values of \<0 were characterized as no agreement, 0 to 0.20 as slight, 0.21 to 0.40 as fair, 0.41 to 0.60 as moderate, 0.61 to 0.80 as substantial, and 0.81 to 1.00 as almost perfect agreement. The 95% confidence interval for the Kappa statistic is based on the asymptotic standard error. |
Countries
France, Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 1658 male participants, \>=50 years of age, with reasons not related to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were included in evaluable Population. The study was conducted at 47 centers in 5 countries; 8 centers in France, 9 centers in Germany, 6 centers in Italy, 18 centers in Russia and 6 centers in Spain.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 2343 male participants were screened for probable Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Of these, 1679 participants were enrolled, 1658 participants were included in the evaluable population. 21 participants progressed in the study but were found to have not met eligibility criteria. Overall, 561 participants completed all 3 visits.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 Participants were screened using the BPE/BPO and IPSS screening tools. Participants with positive responses (i.e. met entry criteria, including positive IPSS score \>=8 and/or BPE/BPO score \>=3) were enrolled and proceeded to Part I (GP Assessment). Participants with probable BPH (PSA\>=2 ng/mL) proceeded to Part II and were scheduled for a urologist assessment which was to confirm or refute a diagnosis of BPH and to estimate whether the participant is at risk of progression of BPH. | 1,658 |
| Total | 1,658 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 5 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 |
| Overall Study | Reached Stopping Criteria | 1,054 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 34 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.26 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American/African Heritage | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Mixed Race | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - Arabic/ North African Heritage | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - Mixed Race | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - White/ Caucasian/European Heritage | 1550 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 1658 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 1,658 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 1,658 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 9 / 1,658 |
Outcome results
Primary
Number of Men With Confirmed Diagnosis of BPH
Confirmed diagnosis of BPH was based on full urologist diagnostic testing with a positive result on the BPE/BPO screening tool (score \>=3) and serum PSA \>=2 ng/mL. The BPE/BPO questionnaire consists of three questions each with a score ranging from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. Participants with probable BPH underwent full urologist diagnostic testing, which included review of medical history, symptoms and previous tests, brief physical examination, Digital rectal examination (DRE). Proportion of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with a positive result on the BPE/BPO screening tool (Score \>= 3) and a diagnosis of BPH by the urologist (Numerator) by number of participants with a positive result on the BPE/BPO screening tool (Score \>= 3) and a BPH assessment by the urologist (Denominator). 95% confidence interval on the proportion was calculated by using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Population: All Evaluable Subject Population comprised of all participants who meet the entry criteria, including a positive IPSS screening result (score \>=8) and/or a positive BPE/BPO screening result (score \>=3).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men With Confirmed Diagnosis of BPH | Numerator | 386 Participants |
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men With Confirmed Diagnosis of BPH | Denominator | 437 Participants |
95% CI: [0.849, 0.912]
Secondary
Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL
Confirmed risk for BPH was based on full urologist diagnostic testing with a positive result on the BPE/BPO and/or IPSS screening tool and probable GP BPH diagnosis. The BPE/BPO questionnaire consists of 3 questions each with a score from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. IPSS tool is used to assess the severity of LUTS symptoms with a score from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. Participants with probable BPH underwent full urologist diagnostic testing, which included review of medical history, symptoms and previous tests, physical examination, DRE. Participants with PSA \>=2.0 ng/mL and other tests were considered as at risk for BPH. Proportion of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and diagnosis of BPH progression risk (Numerator) by number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and a BPH progression risk assessment by the urologist (Denominator).
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Population: All Evaluable Subjects Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Numerator | 424 Participants |
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Denominator | 471 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 and BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Denominator | 386 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 and BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Numerator | 350 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Numerator | 333 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Denominator | 367 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Numerator | 441 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to be at Risk for BPH Progression Based Upon Full Urologist Assessment Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Denominator | 490 Participants |
Comparison: For Arm IPSS \>=895% CI: [0.87, 0.926]
Comparison: For Arm BPE/BPO \>=395% CI: [0.873, 0.934]
Comparison: For Arm IPSS \>=8 and BPE/BPO \>=395% CI: [0.873, 0.935]
Comparison: For Arm PSS \>=8 or BPE/BPO \>=395% CI: [0.87, 0.925]
Secondary
Number of Men That Are Confirmed to Have BPH Based on Full Urologist Assessment of Diagnostic Test Results Among Men With a Positive Result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL
Confirmed diagnosis of BPH was based on full urologist diagnostic testing with a positive result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, BPE/BPO or IPSS screening tools and serum PSA \>=2 ng/mL. The BPE/BPO questionnaire consists of three questions each with a score ranging from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. IPSS tool is used to assess the severity of LUTS symptoms with a score ranging from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. Participants with probable BPH underwent full urologist diagnostic testing, which included review of medical history, symptoms and previous tests, brief physical examination, DRE. Proportion of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and a diagnosis of BPH by the urologist (Numerator) by number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and a BPH assessment by the urologist(Denominator).
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Population: All Evaluable Subjects Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to Have BPH Based on Full Urologist Assessment of Diagnostic Test Results Among Men With a Positive Result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Numerator | 471 Participants |
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to Have BPH Based on Full Urologist Assessment of Diagnostic Test Results Among Men With a Positive Result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Denominator | 537 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 and BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to Have BPH Based on Full Urologist Assessment of Diagnostic Test Results Among Men With a Positive Result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Numerator | 367 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 and BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to Have BPH Based on Full Urologist Assessment of Diagnostic Test Results Among Men With a Positive Result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Denominator | 413 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to Have BPH Based on Full Urologist Assessment of Diagnostic Test Results Among Men With a Positive Result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Numerator | 490 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Confirmed to Have BPH Based on Full Urologist Assessment of Diagnostic Test Results Among Men With a Positive Result on the IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools and Serum PSA >=2 ng/mL | Denominator | 561 Participants |
Comparison: For Arm IPSS \>=895% CI: [0.846, 0.904]
Comparison: For Arm IPSS \>=8 and BPE/BPO \>=395% CI: [0.854, 0.917]
Comparison: For Arm IPSS \>=8 or BPE/BPO \>=395% CI: [0.843, 0.9]
Secondary
Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools
Diagnosis of probable BPH was based on GP assessment among men with a positive result on the BPE/BPO and/or IPSS screening tool. The BPE/BPO questionnaire consists of 3 questions each with a score from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. IPSS tool is used to assess the severity of LUTS symptoms with a score from 0= never experienced to 5= almost always experienced. Probable BPH is the presumptive diagnosis of urinary tract obstruction from an enlarged prostate based on clinical symptoms and findings where urinary symptoms are not apparently related to any other cause. Participants underwent GP assessment and lab result review by GP. Participants with PSA \>=2 ng/mL were assessed for probable BPH. Proportion of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and diagnosis of probable BPH (Numerator) by number of participants with a positive result on the screening tool and a BPH assessment by GP (Denominator).
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Population: All Evaluable Subjects Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Numerator | 556 Participants |
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Denominator | 1538 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 and BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Denominator | 1232 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 and BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Numerator | 453 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Numerator | 428 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Denominator | 1135 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Numerator | 581 Participants |
| IPSS >=8 or BPE/BPO >=3 | Number of Men That Are Diagnosed With Probable BPH as Assessed by the GP Among Men With a Positive Result on the BPE/BPO, IPSS, BPE/BPO and IPSS, and BPE/BPO or IPSS Screening Tools | Denominator | 1635 Participants |
Comparison: For Arm IPSS \>=895% CI: [0.337, 0.386]
Comparison: For Arm BPE/BPO \>=395% CI: [0.341, 0.395]
Comparison: For Arm IPSS \>=8 and BPE/BPO \>=395% CI: [0.349, 0.406]
Comparison: For Arm IPSS \>=8 or BPE/BPO \>=395% CI: [0.332, 0.379]
Secondary
Summary of Agreement Between BPE/BPO and IPSS Screening Tools
Agreement between the IPSS and BPE/BPO tools had to utilize the screened population, as the evaluable population did not include any participants with IPSS \<8 and BPE/BPO\<3. All screened participants with IPSS and BPE/BPO results were utilized (2327 of the 2343 participants had IPSS and BPE/PO results). There were 16 participants (2343 minus 2327) in the screened population without IPSS and BPE/BPO results, and hence were not included in the calculation of the Kappa statistic. Kappa statistic values of \<0 were characterized as no agreement, 0 to 0.20 as slight, 0.21 to 0.40 as fair, 0.41 to 0.60 as moderate, 0.61 to 0.80 as substantial, and 0.81 to 1.00 as almost perfect agreement. The 95% confidence interval for the Kappa statistic is based on the asymptotic standard error.
Time frame: Day 1
Population: All Screened Subjects Population comprised of all participants who were screened for eligibility. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| BPE/BPO >=3 | Summary of Agreement Between BPE/BPO and IPSS Screening Tools | 1812 Participants |
95% CI: [0.51, 0.58]