Skip to content

A Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

A 52-Week Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in bDMARD Naive Patients With Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02757352
Acronym
COAST-X
Enrollment
303
Registered
2016-05-02
Start date
2016-08-02
Completion date
2019-05-07
Last updated
2020-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Axial Spondyloarthritis

Keywords

ankylosing, nonradiographic spondyloarthritis

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the study drug known as ixekizumab in biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) naïve participants with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nonrad-axSpA).

Interventions

DRUGIxekizumab

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Are ambulatory. * Diagnosis of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and fulfilling the 2009 Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria. * Have a history of back pain ≥3 months with age at onset \<45 years. * Have active nr-axSpA defined as BASDAI ≥4 and total back pain ≥4 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) at screening and baseline. * Have objective signs of inflammation by presence of sacroiliitis on MRI and/or presence of elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). * In the past had an inadequate response to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) for duration of 4 weeks or cannot tolerate NSAIDS. * If taking NSAIDS be on stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization. * Have a history of prior therapy for axSpA for at least 12 weeks prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Have radiographic sacroiliitis fulfilling the 1984 modified New York criteria. * Have received any prior, or are currently receiving treatment with biologics, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or other immunomodulatory agents. * Have received a live vaccine within 12 weeks or have had a vaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) within the past year. * Have an ongoing or serious infection within the last 12 weeks or evidence of active tuberculosis. * Have a compromised immune system. * Have any other serious and/or uncontrolled diseases. * Have either a current diagnosis or a recent history of malignant disease. * Have had major surgery within 8 weeks of baseline, or will require surgery during the study. * Are pregnant or breastfeeding. * Have evidence of active anterior uveitis (an acute episode) within the last 42 days prior to baseline randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) ResponseWeek 16ASAS40 is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)40% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥2 units (ranges 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the 4 domains (Patient Global, Spinal Pain, Function, and Inflammation), without any worsening in the remaining domain. 1) Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2) Spinal Pain: How much spinal pain due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Responses were captured using numeric rating scale (NRS) (ranges 0 to 10) with a higher score of worse function. 4) Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) question 5 and 6 (mean of intensity, duration of stiffness). Score ranges (0 (non) to 10 (very severe).
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 ResponseWeek 52ASAS40 is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)40% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥2 units (ranges 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the 4 domains (Patient Global, Spinal Pain, Function, and Inflammation), without any worsening in the remaining domain. 1) Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2) Spinal Pain: How much spinal pain due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Responses were captured using numeric rating scale (NRS) (ranges 0 to 10) with a higher score of worse function. 4) Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) question 5 and 6 (mean of intensity, duration of stiffness). Score ranges (0 (non) to 10 (very severe).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)Baseline, Week 16ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). ASDAS parameters used with (C-reactive protein \[CRP\] as acute phase reactant) are: 1) Total back pain 2) Patient global 3) Peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness 4) CRP in mg/L: ASDAScrp is calculated with the equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110×patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in milligram/liter (mg/L), the range of other variables is from 0 to 10. Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. Least squares mean (LS Mean) was derived from mixed models repeated measure analysis (MMRM) with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Number of Participants Without Clinically Meaningful Changes in Background TherapyBaseline through Week 52Number of participants without changes in background therapy while on originally randomized treatment.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreBaseline, Week 16The SF-36 is a 36-item patient-administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The Physical Component Summary score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 16ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in axSpA. ASDAS low disease activity is defined as a score of \<2.1. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)Baseline, Week 16The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. LS mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) ScoreBaseline, Week 16Both left and right SIJ are scored for bone marrow edema. Each side has 6 slices and each slice has 6 scoring units, and each scoring unit has a score of 0 or 1. Total SIJ SPARCC scores can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. LS Mean was derived from ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis ScoreBaseline, Week 52The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Baseline, Week 52BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participant's functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. Participants were asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant responded to each question using a NRS scale (range 0 to 10), with a higher score indicating worse functioning. The participant's final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 item scores with the minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive DiseaseWeek 52ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in axSpA. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of less than (\<)1.3. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, Week 52High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was the measure of acute phase reactant and was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Baseline, Week 52Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is a combined index comprising the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with axSpA: 1) Lateral spinal flexion 2) Tragus-to-wall distance 3) Lumbar flexion (modified Schrober) 4) Maximal intermalleolar distance, and 5) Cervical rotation. The BASMI includes these 5 measurements that were each scaled to a score of 0 to 10 depending on the result of the assessment (BASMI linear function). The average score of the 5 assessments gives the BASMI linear result. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Chest ExpansionBaseline, Week 52While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor has measured the chest's encircled length by centimeter at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. The difference between maximal inspiration and expiration in centimeters was recorded. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall DistanceBaseline, Week 52The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)Baseline, Week 52Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed included costochondral 1 (right/left \[R/L\]), costochondral 7 (R/L), spinal iliaca anterior superior (R/L), crista iliaca (R/L), spina iliaca posterior (R/L), processus spinosus L5, and achilles tendon proximal insertion (R/L). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores of 44 JointsBaseline, Week 52The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the participants body). The 46 joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which is multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). Swollen joint count SJC was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the participants body). The joints are classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which is multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. Score ranges from 0 (not swollen) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status and baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Number of Participants With Anterior UveitisBaseline through Week 52Number of participants with anterior uveitis. Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 52The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered, single-item, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the one number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)Baseline, Week 52ASAS-HI is a disease-specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17-item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good health) to 17 (poor health). Each item consists of one question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score of 1) or I do not agree (score of 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS Mean was derived MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)Baseline, Week 52Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Patients report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS Mean was derived from using MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresBaseline, Week 52The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS Mean was derived from ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status and baseline value.
Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) ScoreBaseline, Week 52ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI). For NSAID equivalent scoring system, range is from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the greater the NSAID intake. ASAS-NSAID score= (equivalent NSAID score) x (days of intake during PI) x (days per week)/(PI in days).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Anti-Ixekizumab AntibodiesWeek 52A treatment-emergent positive anti-drug antibody (TE-ADA+) participant will be defined as a 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer (Tier 3); or for a negative baseline titer, a participant with an increase from the baseline to a level of ≥ 1:10.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 52PK trough serum concentration samples were collected at steady state (Ctrough ss)

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Finland, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, South Korea, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study has 3 periods: Period 1 - Screening; Period 2 - A Double-Blind Treatment Period (Weeks 0 Up to 52); (Inadequate Responders \[IR\] Week 16-52) followed by a Follow-Up Period (Up to 24 Weeks after last visit)

Pre-assignment details

Participants who completed study were eligible to enroll into a long-term study (Study I1F-MC-RHBY \[RHBY\]) for up to 2 additional years. Participants that do not enroll into study RHBY will complete the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo as 2 SC injections Q2W to week 52.
105
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W
Participants received a starting dose of 80 or 160 mg of ixekizumab given SC at week 0 followed by 80 mg ixekizumab given SC every four weeks (Q4W) to week 52.
96
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W
Participants received a starting dose of 80 or 160 mg of ixekizumab given SC at week 0 followed by 80 mg ixekizumab given SC every two weeks (Q2W) to week 52.
102
Total303

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009
Double-Blind Period (Week 0 - Week 16)Adverse Event2010000000
Double-Blind Period (Week 0 - Week 16)Lost to Follow-up0010000000
Double-Blind Period (Week 0 - Week 16)Withdrawal by Subject6120000000
Double-Blind Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Adverse Event0100000000
Double-Blind Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Classified as Inadequate Responders (IR)6240420000000
Double-Blind Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Lack of Efficacy0100000000
Double-Blind Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Withdrawal by Subject1140000000
Follow-Up PeriodAdverse Event0000001020
Follow-Up PeriodLack of Efficacy0000000011
Follow-Up PeriodLost to Follow-up0000000010
Follow-Up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0000000162
IR-Open Label Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Adverse Event0003010000
IR-Open Label Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Lack of Efficacy0002140000
IR-Open Label Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Physician Decision0000010000
IR-Open Label Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Pregnancy0000100000
IR-Open Label Period (Week 16 - Week 52)Withdrawal by Subject0002110000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboIxekizumab 80 mg Q4WIxekizumab 80 mg Q2WTotal
Age, Continuous39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36
40.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.47
40.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.01
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.92
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants24 Participants31 Participants80 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
68 Participants57 Participants63 Participants188 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants15 Participants8 Participants35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
8 Participants2 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
17 Participants13 Participants11 Participants41 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants1 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
76 Participants80 Participants83 Participants239 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
8 Participants6 Participants9 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
15 Participants16 Participants13 Participants44 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
2 Participants6 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
6 Participants5 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
14 Participants13 Participants15 Participants42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
19 Participants18 Participants20 Participants57 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
12 Participants7 Participants8 Participants27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
9 Participants7 Participants6 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants9 Participants9 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
61 Participants46 Participants53 Participants160 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants50 Participants49 Participants143 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1040 / 960 / 1020 / 420 / 400 / 620 / 50 / 30 / 50 / 280 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 10443 / 9647 / 10213 / 4215 / 4026 / 623 / 51 / 31 / 51 / 280 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1042 / 961 / 1021 / 420 / 402 / 620 / 50 / 30 / 51 / 280 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response

ASAS40 is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)40% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥2 units (ranges 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the 4 domains (Patient Global, Spinal Pain, Function, and Inflammation), without any worsening in the remaining domain. 1) Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2) Spinal Pain: How much spinal pain due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Responses were captured using numeric rating scale (NRS) (ranges 0 to 10) with a higher score of worse function. 4) Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) question 5 and 6 (mean of intensity, duration of stiffness). Score ranges (0 (non) to 10 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included. Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response13.3 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response30.2 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response31.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.38, 5.77]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.4, 5.77]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response

ASAS40 is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)40% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥2 units (ranges 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the 4 domains (Patient Global, Spinal Pain, Function, and Inflammation), without any worsening in the remaining domain. 1) Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). 2) Spinal Pain: How much spinal pain due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). 3) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Participant is asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Responses were captured using numeric rating scale (NRS) (ranges 0 to 10) with a higher score of worse function. 4) Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) question 5 and 6 (mean of intensity, duration of stiffness). Score ranges (0 (non) to 10 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included. Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response19.0 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response35.4 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response40.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00995% CI: [1.23, 4.51]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.48, 5.25]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score

The medical outcomes study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) SF-36 PCS are summarized using the t-scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score4.7210 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2459
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score8.9211 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.0783
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score9.3291 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.081
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [0.9525, 7.4477]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.3629, 7.8533]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score

The SF-36 is a 36-item patient-administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The Physical Component Summary score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score5.2103 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7999
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score8.0612 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8129
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score7.9600 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8023
p-value: 0.01395% CI: [0.6092, 5.0926]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.01595% CI: [0.5299, 4.9694]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in axSpA. ASDAS parameters used (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are: 1 )Total back pain 2) Patient global 3) Peripheral pain/swelling 4) Duration of morning stiffness 5) CRP in mg/L: ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in milligram/liter (mg/L), the range of other variables is from 0 to 10. Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-0.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.136
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.116
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.116
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.96, -0.26]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.05, -0.34]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). ASDAS parameters used with (C-reactive protein \[CRP\] as acute phase reactant) are: 1) Total back pain 2) Patient global 3) Peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness 4) CRP in mg/L: ASDAScrp is calculated with the equation: 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110×patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in milligram/liter (mg/L), the range of other variables is from 0 to 10. Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. Ln represents the natural logarithm. Least squares mean (LS Mean) was derived from mixed models repeated measure analysis (MMRM) with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-0.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.12 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.097
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-1.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.81, -0.28]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.94, -0.41]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)

ASAS-HI is a disease-specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17-item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good health) to 17 (poor health). Each item consists of one question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score of 1) or I do not agree (score of 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS Mean was derived MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-2.57 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.455
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-3.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.395
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-3.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.396
p-value: 0.3395% CI: [-1.77, 0.6]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1195% CI: [-2.15, 0.22]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score

ASAS-NSAID score is used to present the NSAID intake by considering the type of NSAID, the total dose, & the number of days taking NSAID during a period of interest (PI). For NSAID equivalent scoring system, range is from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the greater the NSAID intake. ASAS-NSAID score= (equivalent NSAID score) x (days of intake during PI) x (days per week)/(PI in days).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had NSAID (including COX-2 Inhibitor) intake at Baseline. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-8.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.986
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-7.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.257
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in ASAS-Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Score-5.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.935
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. LS mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-1.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.216
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.217
p-value: 0.03195% CI: [-1.28, -0.06]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.61, -0.41]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. LS mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-1.76 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.305
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.266
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-3.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.266
p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-1.92, -0.33]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-2.08, -0.49]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

BASFI is a participant-reported assessment that establishes a participant's functional baseline and subsequent response to treatment. Participants were asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant responded to each question using a NRS scale (range 0 to 10), with a higher score indicating worse functioning. The participant's final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 item scores with the minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10, with a higher score indicating worse function. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-1.57 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.333
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-2.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.292
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-2.75 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.291
p-value: 0.01895% CI: [-1.93, -0.18]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00895% CI: [-2.05, -0.31]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is a combined index comprising the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with axSpA: 1) Lateral spinal flexion 2) Tragus-to-wall distance 3) Lumbar flexion (modified Schrober) 4) Maximal intermalleolar distance, and 5) Cervical rotation. The BASMI includes these 5 measurements that were each scaled to a score of 0 to 10 depending on the result of the assessment (BASMI linear function). The average score of the 5 assessments gives the BASMI linear result. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.112
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.097
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.48 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.097
p-value: 0.00895% CI: [-0.69, -0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.03895% CI: [-0.6, -0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion

While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor has measured the chest's encircled length by centimeter at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. The difference between maximal inspiration and expiration in centimeters was recorded. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.57 centimeter (cm)Standard Error 0.253
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.62 centimeter (cm)Standard Error 0.206
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion0.91 centimeter (cm)Standard Error 0.209
p-value: 0.87195% CI: [-0.59, 0.7]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.29595% CI: [-0.3, 0.99]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)

Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed included costochondral 1 (right/left \[R/L\]), costochondral 7 (R/L), spinal iliaca anterior superior (R/L), crista iliaca (R/L), spina iliaca posterior (R/L), processus spinosus L5, and achilles tendon proximal insertion (R/L). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants with baseline Mases score \> 0. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-2.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.361
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-3.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.342
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-3.19 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.336
p-value: 0.08295% CI: [-1.85, 0.11]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.08895% CI: [-1.82, 0.13]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score

Both left and right SIJ are scored for bone marrow edema. Each side has 6 slices and each slice has 6 scoring units, and each scoring unit has a score of 0 or 1. Total SIJ SPARCC scores can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores reflecting worse disease. LS Mean was derived from ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status and baseline value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and Week 16 SPARCC score. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score-0.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.539
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score-3.38 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.549
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score-4.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4.58, -1.57]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-5.68, -2.72]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance

The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance0.04 cmStandard Error 0.312
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.42 cmStandard Error 0.257
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.73 cmStandard Error 0.259
p-value: 0.25795% CI: [-1.26, 0.34]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.05795% CI: [-1.56, 0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores of 44 Joints

The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the participants body). The 46 joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which is multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). Swollen joint count SJC was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the participants body). The joints are classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which is multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. Score ranges from 0 (not swollen) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status and baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants with baseline TJC\>0 for the TJC analysis. All randomized participants with baseline SJC\>0 for the SJC analysis. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores of 44 JointsTJC-0.59 joint countsStandard Error 1.039
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores of 44 JointsSJC-3.66 joint countsStandard Error 0.261
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores of 44 JointsTJC-2.38 joint countsStandard Error 0.993
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores of 44 JointsSJC-4.63 joint countsStandard Error 0.237
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores of 44 JointsTJC-4.12 joint countsStandard Error 0.916
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Scores of 44 JointsSJC-4.41 joint countsStandard Error 0.228
Comparison: TJCp-value: 0.21995% CI: [-4.66, 1.09]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: TJCp-value: 0.01395% CI: [-6.3, -0.76]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: SJCp-value: 0.00995% CI: [-1.68, -0.26]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: SJCp-value: 0.03495% CI: [-1.46, -0.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score

The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value visit, baseline value-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline SPARCC score \>0. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score-2.87 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.447
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score-2.99 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.427
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Score-3.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.407
p-value: 0.84995% CI: [-1.35, 1.11]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.64895% CI: [-1.48, 0.93]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score

The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered, single-item, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the one number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
p-value: 0.32595% CI: [-1.5, 0.5]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.20695% CI: [-1.6, 0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)

Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Patients report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS Mean was derived from using MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
p-value: 0.34895% CI: [-2.4, 0.8]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.38695% CI: [-2.3, 0.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was the measure of acute phase reactant and was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. LS Mean was derived from MMRM with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-4.804 milligram/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 2.037
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-8.611 milligram/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 2.0028
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-7.547 milligram/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.9654
p-value: 0.18395% CI: [-9.418, 1.804]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.33195% CI: [-8.294, 2.807]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores

The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA patient population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS Mean was derived from ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, screening MRI/CRP status and baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included. Missing data were imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Impairment Score-13.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.386
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of absenteeism-3.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.215
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of presenteeism-12.40 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of impairment in activities-14.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.584
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of impairment in activities-25.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.617
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Impairment Score-26.96 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.439
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of presenteeism-26.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.245
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of absenteeism-9.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.257
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of impairment in activities-24.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.567
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of absenteeism-7.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.151
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresPercentage of presenteeism-18.61 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.047
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresOverall Impairment Score-19.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.221
Comparison: Overall Impairment Scorep-value: 0.00595% CI: [-23.32, -4.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Overall Impairment Scorep-value: 0.18395% CI: [-15.58, 3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of absenteeismp-value: 0.0695% CI: [-12.05, 0.26]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of absenteeismp-value: 0.18295% CI: [-10.27, 1.97]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of presentismp-value: 0.00395% CI: [-22.62, -4.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of presentismp-value: 0.16495% CI: [-15, 2.58]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of Impairment in Activities Performed Outside of Workp-value: 0.00495% CI: [-17.85, -3.41]LS Mean Difference
Comparison: Percentage of Impairment in Activities Performed Outside of Workp-value: 0.00695% CI: [-17.12, -2.86]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anterior Uveitis

Number of participants with anterior uveitis. Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 52

Population: All randomized participants regardless of history of anterior uveitis. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anterior Uveitis2 Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WNumber of Participants With Anterior Uveitis1 Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WNumber of Participants With Anterior Uveitis2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Without Clinically Meaningful Changes in Background Therapy

Number of participants without changes in background therapy while on originally randomized treatment.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. Additional analysis not performed due to small number of participants with changes in background therapy and complete overlap with switch to open-label ixekizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Without Clinically Meaningful Changes in Background Therapy98 Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WNumber of Participants Without Clinically Meaningful Changes in Background Therapy90 Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WNumber of Participants Without Clinically Meaningful Changes in Background Therapy100 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies

A treatment-emergent positive anti-drug antibody (TE-ADA+) participant will be defined as a 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer (Tier 3); or for a negative baseline titer, a participant with an increase from the baseline to a level of ≥ 1:10.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participant who received at least one dose of ixekizumab during the study and had an evaluable baseline sample and at least 1 evaluable post baseline sample.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies14 Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies5 Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies8 Participants
Ixe80Q4W-Q2WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in axSpA. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as a score of less than (\<)1.3. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included. Missing data was imputed using the NRI method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease2.9 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease13.5 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Inactive Disease10.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.001196% CI: [1.47, 19.4]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.03195% CI: [1.14, 15.66]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease Activity

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in axSpA. ASDAS low disease activity is defined as a score of \<2.1. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants with baseline ASDAS \<2.1. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included. Missing data was imputed using the NRI method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease Activity8.6 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease Activity29.8 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease Activity27.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.02, 10.41]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.76, 9.05]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease Activity

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in axSpA. ASDAS low disease activity is defined as a score of \<2.1. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: All randomized participants with baseline ASDAS \<2.1. For inadequate responders who were treated with open label ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W, only data up to the time of initiation of open label of ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W were included. Missing data was imputed using the NRI method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease Activity12.4 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease Activity27.7 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS Low Disease Activity32.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00895% CI: [1.3, 5.76]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.66, 7.08]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)

PK trough serum concentration samples were collected at steady state (Ctrough ss)

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had evaluable PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)7.88 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)9.56 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)10.3 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 61
Ixe80Q4W-Q2WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)10.4 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 72
IxeQ4W (80S) IxeQ4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)2.88 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49
IxeQ4W (80S)/IxeQ2W Open LabelPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)6.45 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 124
IxeQ4W(160S)/IxeQ4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)3.54 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79
IxeQ4W (160S) IxeQ2W Open LabelPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)11.5 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 53
PBO/IxeQ2W Open LabelPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)9.25 microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026