Skip to content

Perioperative Accuracy of the Raiing Wireless Axillary Thermometer

Perioperative Accuracy of the Raiing Wireless Axillary Thermometer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02756910
Enrollment
80
Registered
2016-04-29
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2021-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Surgery Under General Anesthesia

Keywords

open abdominal surgery, anesthesia, general

Brief summary

A new wireless axillary thermometer from Raiing Medical uses a proprietary system, iThermonitor (WT701), to provide better estimates of core temperature than a conventional axillary probe. Improvement results in part because the axillary probe measures and records temperatures continuously every 4 seconds and includes software to compensate for ambient temperature and positional changes including arm abduction. Whether the iThermonitor is sufficiently accurate for clinical use remains unknown. The investigators thus propose to evaluate the system in perioperative patients who often experience thermal perturbations over a range of several °C. Specifically, the investigators propose to determine the precision and accuracy of iThermonitor in surgical patients and during the initial hour of recovery. As in previous studies, the investigators will consider the thermometer sufficiently accurate for clinical use if most Raiing temperatures are within ±0.5°C of the reference temperature.

Detailed description

Patient characteristics, including age, height, weight, sex, and ASA status, and details of the surgery, including procedure and postoperative diagnosis will be recorded. The investigator will record the time of anesthesia induction and emergence. At 10-minute intervals during surgery, the investigator will record inspired volatile anesthetic concentration, mean-arterial pressure, type of thermal management device(s), and urine output over the previous 10-minute interval. After induction of general anesthesia (without restriction as to type), the anesthesiologist will insert a temperature sensor into the distal esophagus. The distance will be determined by maximal heart sounds (if a stethoscope is used), or the probe will be inserted 0.48.(sitting height) - 4.4 cm. If an esophageal probe cannot be used, a thermometer can be inserted to between 10 and 20 cm into the nasopharynx. The surgical team will position a Foley catheter with temperature sensor into the urinary bladder. Ambient temperature will be recorded from an electronic probe situated at the height of the patients, well away from any heat-producing equipment. Axillary temperature will be recorded by iThermonitor, a Raiing Medical wireless module, paired to an iPhone. An adhesive patch provided by Raiing will be used to securely position the Railing probe in a shaved axilla before the anesthesia induction. Patients will be asked to adduct the ipsilateral arm for up to 5 minutes after the probe is inserted, or until the temperature displayed on the paired iPhone is stable. Thereafter, patients will be free to move their arms.Monitored arm position during surgery will be recorded (arm tightly tucked, arm loose at side, arm abducted). Temperatures will be recorded at 10-minute intervals during surgery and during the initial postoperative hour. Just before anesthetic emergence, the esophageal or nasopharyngeal thermometer will be removed, but the Foley catheter retained. The axillary device will then be removed after an hour of recovery, and the study concluded. The Foley catheter can be removed or retained per clinical need.

Interventions

DEVICEiThermonitor (WT701)

Continuously monitor the axillary temperature during surgery

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults having an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 1-3 * must be scheduled for surgery of the abdomen or pelvis that is expected to last 1.5-4 hours * require general endotracheal anesthesia and insertion of a Foley catheter

Exclusion criteria

* patients in whom neither esophageal nor nasopharyngeal temperature monitoring is practical * patients in whom active intravenous infusion is required in both arms * patients who are allergic to hydrogel

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of iThermonitor in Surgical PatientsFrom 1 to 3 hours after induction of anesthesiaAccuracy, defined as the true difference between reference and iThermonitor temperature. The esophageal temperature will be the core temperature reference during surgery. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of iThermonitor measurements for a patient that are within 0.5° C of the reference will be calculated, and this proportion (median, quartiles, 95% CI) will be summarized across patients. The Secondary outcome measure are bias and 95% CIs determined by repeated-measures Bland-Altman analysis. For each patient the average difference between the iThermometer and the reference temperature will be calculated. Patient iThermonitor measurements will be regressed on patient reference measurements to assess the Pearson correlation and 95% CI between iThermonitor and reference and to estimate the bias (slope) of device versus reference.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Surgery Patients >1.5 Hrs
Use esophageal catheter for core temperature monitoring, Foley catheter for bladder temperature monitoring, and iThermonitor (WT701) for axillary temperature monitoring iThermonitor (WT701): Continuously monitor the axillary temperature during surgery
80
Total80

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSurgery Patients >1.5 Hrs
Age, Continuous55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

Accuracy of iThermonitor in Surgical Patients

Accuracy, defined as the true difference between reference and iThermonitor temperature. The esophageal temperature will be the core temperature reference during surgery. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of iThermonitor measurements for a patient that are within 0.5° C of the reference will be calculated, and this proportion (median, quartiles, 95% CI) will be summarized across patients. The Secondary outcome measure are bias and 95% CIs determined by repeated-measures Bland-Altman analysis. For each patient the average difference between the iThermometer and the reference temperature will be calculated. Patient iThermonitor measurements will be regressed on patient reference measurements to assess the Pearson correlation and 95% CI between iThermonitor and reference and to estimate the bias (slope) of device versus reference.

Time frame: From 1 to 3 hours after induction of anesthesia

Population: There were a total of 3,339 sets of iThermonitor and reference measurements from 80 patients (42 sets per patient on average). The iThermonitor temperature and the reference esophageal temperature agreed well overall. The iThermonitor temperatures ranged from 34.7 to 38.3°C, while the esophageal core temperatures ranged from 34.6 to 37.9°C

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Surgery Patients >1.5 HrsAccuracy of iThermonitor in Surgical Patients0.14 celsiusStandard Deviation 0.26
p-value: <0.05bootstrapping

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026