Skip to content

A Study Evaluating Venetoclax (ABT-199) in Multiple Myeloma Subjects Who Are Receiving Bortezomib and Dexamethasone as Standard Therapy

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind Study of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Combination With Either Venetoclax or Placebo in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Are Sensitive or Naïve to Proteasome Inhibitors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02755597
Acronym
Bellini
Enrollment
291
Registered
2016-04-29
Start date
2016-07-11
Completion date
2022-08-15
Last updated
2023-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, Relapsed multiple myeloma, Refractory multiple myeloma, Multiple myeloma

Brief summary

This was a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of venetoclax plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who are considered sensitive or naïve to proteasome inhibitors and received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy for multiple myeloma.

Interventions

DRUGVenetoclax

Participants self-administered venetoclax tablets by mouth QD in combination with bortezomib. Venetoclax was to be given before other agents administered on the same day, if applicable. Each venetoclax dose was to be taken all at one time with approximately 240 mL of water within 30 minutes after completion of breakfast or the subject's first meal of the day. Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed. On days that pre-dose PK sampling was required, dosing occurred at the clinic to facilitate PK sampling.

DRUGBortezomib

Bortezomib (subcutaneous injection \[preferred\] or IV) was given following administration of venetoclax or placebo in Cycles 1 -8 on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11, and for Cycles 9 and beyond, on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and was to be administered per the prescribing information. The route of administration was to stay the same during the study.

DRUGDexamethasone

Dexamethasone was to be given orally, administered per the prescribing information, the day of bortezomib dosing and the following day, given the protocol-defined dosing window (bortezomib dosing window is ± 1 day) is maintained. If bortezomib was interrupted or a dose is skipped, dexamethasone was to be administered as scheduled per protocol (unless dexamethasone was interrupted due to toxicity).

DRUGPlacebo for venetoclax

Participants self-administered placebo tablets by mouth QD in combination with bortezomib. Placebo was to be given before other agents administered on the same day, if applicable. Each placebo dose was to be taken all at one time with approximately 240 mL of water within 30 minutes after completion of breakfast or the subject's first meal of the day. Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed. On days that pre-dose PK sampling was required, dosing occurred at the clinic to facilitate PK sampling.

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤ 2 * Participant has documented relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma on or after any regimen or who are refractory to the most recent line of therapy. Relapsed myeloma is defined as previously treated myeloma that progresses and requires initiation of salvage therapy, but does not meet the criteria for refractory myeloma. Refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is nonresponsive (failure to achieve minimal response or development of progressive disease \[PD\]) while on primary or salvage therapy, or progresses within 60 days of last therapy. * Participant must have received prior treatment with at least one, but no more than three, prior lines of therapy for multiple myeloma. A line of therapy consists of ≥ 1 complete cycle of a single agent, a regimen consisting of combination of several drugs, or a planned sequential therapy of various regimens. * Prior treatment with bortezomib or other proteasome inhibitor is allowed, provided ALL of the following criteria are met: Disease is NOT refractory to any proteasome inhibitor, defined as no disease progression (i.e., PD, per International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] or European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation \[EBMT\] criteria) while receiving proteasome inhibitor therapy or within 60 days after the last dose, AND best response achieved with any proteasome inhibitor therapy (alone or in combination) was at least a Partial Response (PR), AND participant did not discontinue any proteasome inhibitor due to intolerance or ≥ Grade 3 related toxicity. * Participant has measurable disease at Screening, defined as at least one of the following: Serum M-protein ≥ 0.5 g/dL, OR Urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg in 24-hours, OR serum immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) ≥ 10 mg/dL provided serum FLC ratio is abnormal.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant is refractory to any proteasome inhibitor, defined as progression on or within 60 days of the last dose of a proteasome inhibitor-containing regimen. * Participant has had prior treatment with proteasome inhibitor within 60 days prior to first dose of study drug. * Participant has any of the following conditions: Non-secretory multiple myeloma, active plasma cell leukemia i.e., either 20% of peripheral white blood cells or greater than 2.0 X 10\^9/liter (L) circulating plasma cells by standard differential, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes), known Human Immunodeficiency Viral (HIV) infection, active hepatitis B or C infection based on blood screen tests, significant cardiovascular disease, including uncontrolled angina, severe or uncontrolled arrhythmia, recent myocardial infarction within 6 months of randomization, or congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class ≥ 3, major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization, acute infections requiring parenteral therapy (antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral) within 14 days prior to randomization, peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 3 or ≥ Grade 2 with pain within 2 weeks prior to randomization, uncontrolled diabetes or uncontrolled hypertension within 14 days prior to randomization, any other medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would adversely affect the participant's participation in the study * Participant has a history of other active malignancies, including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), within the past 3 years prior to study entry, with the following exceptions: Adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri or the breast, basal cell carcinoma of the skin or localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, prostate cancer Gleason grade 6 or lower AND with stable Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels off treatment, previous malignancy with no evidence of disease confined and surgically resected (or treated with other modalities) with curative intent and unlikely to impact survival during the duration of the study * If participant had prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT), participant has evidence of ongoing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Median duration of follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo groupPFS is defined as the number of days from the date the participant was randomized to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With High B-cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) ExpressionMedian duration of follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo groupPFS is defined as the number of days from the date the participant was randomized to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) per investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. BCL-2 expression was determined through central laboratory testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and based on a pre-specified scoring algorithm. High clinical score of 2+: ≥50% of tumor cells with moderate or higher cytoplasmic staining but \< 50% of tumor cells with strong staining intensity; high clinical score of 3+: ≥50% of tumor cells with strong cytoplasmic staining.
Duration of Response (DOR)Response was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo groupDOR is defined as the number of days from the participant's date of first documented response (partial response \[PR\] or better) to the date of first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. DOR was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainBaseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatmentThe BPI-SF is a pain-specific measure developed to assess patient-reported severity (or intensity) of pain (4 items) and the impact of pain on daily functioning (7 items) in patients with cancer pain. The four pain severity items assess pain at its worst in last 24 hours, least in last 24 hours, average, and now (current pain). For these items, participants are asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The Worst Pain scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating severe pain. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatmentThe QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Physical Functioning scale, participants rate five items on a four-point scale, with 1 as not at all and 4 as very much. The Physical Functioning Scale scores range from 0 to 100 and were calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high scale score represents high/healthy level of functioning. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatmentThe QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, participants rate two items on a seven point scale, with 1 as very poor and 7 as excellent. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100 and was calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response RateResponse was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo groupThe percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better (VGPR, Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) was computed.
Overall Survival (OS).Median duration of follow-up was 45.6 months for the venetoclax group and 45.6 months for the placebo groupOS is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. All events of death were to be included, regardless of whether the event occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or after the participant discontinued study drug. If a participant is not known to have died, OS was censored at the date of last contact. The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time to Progression (TTP)Median time on follow-up up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo groupTTP is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. TTP was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Response was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo groupOverall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response \[VGPR\], Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity RateAssessed at Screening; to confirm a stringent Complete Response (sCR) or Complete Response (CR); at 6 months and 12 months post-confirmed CR/sCRMRD negativity rate is defined as the percentage of participants who have negative MRD by bone marrow aspirate at any time point after randomization and before progression or starting subsequent therapy. MRD negativity was defined at 10\^-5 threshold (less than one residual myeloma cell per 10\^5 total nucleated cells) as measured by centralized testing of bone marrow aspirate by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). MRD positive participants include those of which all tested samples were found to be MRD positive or indeterminate. Participants with missing or unevaluable MRD status were considered as MRD positive.
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreBaseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatmentPROMIS Cancer Fatigue SF is a seven item questionnaire that assesses the impact and experience of fatigue over the past 7 days. All questions employ the following five response options: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little bit, 3 = Somewhat, 4 = Quite a bit, and 5 = Very much. The total raw score is the sum of the responses to each question and is converted to a T-score. The T-score re-scales the total raw score to a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The \[PROMIS\] Cancer Fatigue Short Form \[SF\] 7a T-Scores range from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more fatigue. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Countries

Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone
Cycles 1-8: Venetoclax 800 mg orally every day (QD) on Days 1 - 21 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m\^2 subcutaneously or IV on Days 1, 4, 8 & 11 and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 & 12; Cycles 9 and beyond: Venetoclax 800 mg orally every day (QD) on Days 1 - 35 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m\^2 subcutaneously or IV on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23
194
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone
Cycles 1-8: Placebo (to match venetoclax 100 mg tablet) 800 mg orally every day (QD) on Days 1 - 21 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m\^2 subcutaneously or IV on Days 1, 4, 8 & 11 and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 & 12; Cycles 9 and beyond: Placebo (to match venetoclax 100 mg tablet) 800 mg orally every day (QD) on Days 1 - 35 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m\^2 subcutaneously or IV on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 & 23
97
Total291

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath7836
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyOther, not specified203
Overall StudyParticipant missing reason for study discontinuation10
Overall StudyStudy terminated by Sponsor6747
Overall StudyWithdrew consent2711

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVenetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneTotalPlacebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone
Age, Continuous65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41
65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.81
Chromosomal abnormality (CA) risk by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
High
31 Participants49 Participants18 Participants
Chromosomal abnormality (CA) risk by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
MISSING
13 Participants16 Participants3 Participants
Chromosomal abnormality (CA) risk by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
Standard
141 Participants213 Participants72 Participants
Chromosomal abnormality (CA) risk by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
Unknown
9 Participants13 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants32 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
169 Participants259 Participants90 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Multiple myeloma International Staging System(ISS) stage
MISSING
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Multiple myeloma International Staging System(ISS) stage
Not evaluable
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Multiple myeloma International Staging System(ISS) stage
Stage I
81 Participants129 Participants48 Participants
Multiple myeloma International Staging System(ISS) stage
Stage II
69 Participants101 Participants32 Participants
Multiple myeloma International Staging System(ISS) stage
Stage III
39 Participants52 Participants13 Participants
Number of prior lines of multiple myeloma therapy
1 line
91 Participants135 Participants44 Participants
Number of prior lines of multiple myeloma therapy
2-3 lines
103 Participants156 Participants53 Participants
Number of prior lines of therapy1.0 number of prior lines of therapy1.0 number of prior lines of therapy2.0 number of prior lines of therapy
Prior exposure to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
MISSING
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Prior exposure to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
Naïve
185 Participants280 Participants95 Participants
Prior exposure to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
Refractory
5 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Prior exposure to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
Sensitive
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Prior exposure to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
Unknown
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Prior exposure to an immunomodulatory drug (IMID)
MISSING
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Prior exposure to an immunomodulatory drug (IMID)
Naïve
63 Participants93 Participants30 Participants
Prior exposure to an immunomodulatory drug (IMID)
Refractory
64 Participants100 Participants36 Participants
Prior exposure to an immunomodulatory drug (IMID)
Sensitive
67 Participants96 Participants29 Participants
Prior exposure to an immunomodulatory drug (IMID)
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (PI)
MISSING
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (PI)
Naïve
61 Participants89 Participants28 Participants
Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (PI)
Refractory
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (PI)
Sensitive
131 Participants197 Participants66 Participants
Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (PI)
Unknown
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Prior stem cell transplant
Allogeneic
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Prior stem cell transplant
Autologous
114 Participants171 Participants57 Participants
Prior stem cell transplant
MISSING
78 Participants118 Participants40 Participants
Prior stem cell transplant
Syngeneic
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
59 Participants87 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants12 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
124 Participants190 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
97 Participants139 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
97 Participants152 Participants55 Participants
Time since diagnosis1263.5 days1318.0 days1461.0 days

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
81 / 19436 / 97
other
Total, other adverse events
191 / 19395 / 96
serious
Total, serious adverse events
115 / 19353 / 96

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the number of days from the date the participant was randomized to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Time frame: Median duration of follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneProgression-free Survival (PFS)23.2 months
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneProgression-free Survival (PFS)11.5 months
Comparison: Stratified Analysis; Stratification factors: Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (naïve versus sensitive), and number of prior lines of therapy (1 versus 2 or 3)p-value: =0.01295% CI: [0.471, 0.913]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the number of days from the participant's date of first documented response (partial response \[PR\] or better) to the date of first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. DOR was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Time frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)NA months
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)12.8 months
Comparison: Stratified Analysis; Stratification factors: Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (naïve versus sensitive), and number of prior lines of therapy (1 versus 2 or 3)p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.343, 0.753]Log Rank
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain

The BPI-SF is a pain-specific measure developed to assess patient-reported severity (or intensity) of pain (4 items) and the impact of pain on daily functioning (7 items) in patients with cancer pain. The four pain severity items assess pain at its worst in last 24 hours, least in last 24 hours, average, and now (current pain). For these items, participants are asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The Worst Pain scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating severe pain. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatment

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization; participants who have both baseline and post-baseline values are included in the analysis at each visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 15, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 5, Day 10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 7, Day 1-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 9, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 11, Day 1-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 13, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 3, Day 1-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 17, Day 1-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 19, Day 1-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 21, Day 1-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 23, Day 1-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 25, Day 10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 27, Day 10.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 29, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 31, Day 10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 33, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 35, Day 10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 37, Day 10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 39, Day 10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 41, Day 10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 43, Day 1-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.07
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 45, Day 1-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.64
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 47, Day 1-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.77
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainFinal visit0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 47, Day 11.0 units on a scale
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 3, Day 1-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 27, Day 10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 5, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.15
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 39, Day 1-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 7, Day 10.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.98
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 29, Day 10.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 9, Day 10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 45, Day 11.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 11, Day 10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.45
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 31, Day 10.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 13, Day 1-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 41, Day 10.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 15, Day 1-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 33, Day 10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 17, Day 1-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainFinal visit0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.55
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 19, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 35, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 21, Day 1-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 43, Day 10.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 23, Day 1-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 37, Day 11.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 25, Day 10.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, participants rate two items on a seven point scale, with 1 as very poor and 7 as excellent. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100 and was calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatment

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization; participants who have both baseline and post-baseline values are included in the analysis at each visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 15, Day 1-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.09
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 5, Day 1-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.74
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 7, Day 1-8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.76
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 9, Day 1-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.33
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 11, Day 1-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.58
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 13, Day 1-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.05
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.75
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 17, Day 1-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.91
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 19, Day 1-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.51
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 21, Day 1-6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.16
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 23, Day 1-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 25, Day 1-4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.29
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 27, Day 1-9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.46
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 29, Day 1-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.67
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 31, Day 1-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.48
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 33, Day 1-7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.22
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 35, Day 1-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.03
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 37, Day 1-13.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.86
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 39, Day 1-9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.05
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 41, Day 1-11.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.47
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 43, Day 12.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.95
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 45, Day 1-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.75
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 47, Day 110.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.95
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Final visit-8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 47, Day 1-8.3 units on a scale
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.63
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 27, Day 14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 5, Day 1-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.54
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 39, Day 10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 7, Day 1-6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.56
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 29, Day 1-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.33
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 9, Day 1-6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.22
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 45, Day 14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.89
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 11, Day 1-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.38
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 31, Day 15.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.36
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 13, Day 1-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.24
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 41, Day 18.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 15, Day 10.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.56
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 33, Day 1-7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.79
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 17, Day 1-7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.55
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Final visit-6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.5
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 19, Day 10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.09
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 35, Day 14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.23
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 21, Day 1-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.01
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 43, Day 1-8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.57
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 23, Day 1-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.99
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 37, Day 110.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 25, Day 1-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.68
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] Score

PROMIS Cancer Fatigue SF is a seven item questionnaire that assesses the impact and experience of fatigue over the past 7 days. All questions employ the following five response options: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little bit, 3 = Somewhat, 4 = Quite a bit, and 5 = Very much. The total raw score is the sum of the responses to each question and is converted to a T-score. The T-score re-scales the total raw score to a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The \[PROMIS\] Cancer Fatigue Short Form \[SF\] 7a T-Scores range from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more fatigue. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatment

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization; participants who have both baseline and post-baseline values are included in the analysis at each visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 27, Day 13.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.19
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 15, Day 11.5 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.84
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 29, Day 13.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.07
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 17, Day 11.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.11
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 31, Day 12.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.43
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 7, Day 13.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.28
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 33, Day 12.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.93
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 19, Day 10.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.52
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 35, Day 13.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.27
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 11, Day 10.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.54
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 37, Day 14.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.72
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 21, Day 11.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.58
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 39, Day 13.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.12
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 5, Day 13.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.25
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 41, Day 13.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.69
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 23, Day 12.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.08
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 43, Day 15.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.28
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 13, Day 11.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.03
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 45, Day 1-0.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.99
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 25, Day 12.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.59
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 47, Day 1-2.5 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.3
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 9, Day 12.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.9
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreFinal visit5.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.95
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 3, Day 12.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.54
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreFinal visit2.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.96
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 15, Day 12.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.66
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 3, Day 11.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.12
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 5, Day 12.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.34
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 7, Day 12.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.7
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 9, Day 12.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.67
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 11, Day 13.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.98
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 13, Day 12.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.97
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 17, Day 12.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.05
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 19, Day 10.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.32
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 21, Day 11.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.66
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 23, Day 11.5 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.83
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 25, Day 1-0.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.73
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 27, Day 1-0.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.59
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 29, Day 10.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.51
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 31, Day 1-0.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.15
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 33, Day 13.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.17
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 35, Day 11.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.22
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 37, Day 1-3.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.72
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 39, Day 14.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 2.82
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 41, Day 1-0.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.9
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 43, Day 14.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 1.91
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 45, Day 11.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0.28
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 47, Day 10.0 T-score
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Physical Functioning scale, participants rate five items on a four-point scale, with 1 as not at all and 4 as very much. The Physical Functioning Scale scores range from 0 to 100 and were calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high scale score represents high/healthy level of functioning. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatment

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization; participants who have both baseline and post-baseline values are included in the analysis at each visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 15, Day 1-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.72
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 5, Day 1-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.38
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 7, Day 1-6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.19
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 9, Day 1-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.54
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 11, Day 1-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.92
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 13, Day 1-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.57
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.22
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 17, Day 1-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.23
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 19, Day 1-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 21, Day 1-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.81
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 23, Day 1-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.32
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 25, Day 1-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.28
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 27, Day 1-8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.69
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 29, Day 1-8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.25
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 31, Day 1-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.98
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 33, Day 1-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.76
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 35, Day 1-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.64
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 37, Day 1-7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.49
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 39, Day 1-10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 41, Day 1-13.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.65
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 43, Day 1-7.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.12
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 45, Day 1-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.33
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Final visit-11.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.85
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 47, Day 10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Final visit-10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.52
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 27, Day 1-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.44
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 5, Day 1-7.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 39, Day 18.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 7, Day 1-8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.76
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 29, Day 1-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.81
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 9, Day 1-8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.01
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 45, Day 113.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.86
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 11, Day 1-7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.46
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 31, Day 12.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.56
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 13, Day 1-8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.85
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 41, Day 113.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.09
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 15, Day 1-7.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.27
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 33, Day 1-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.64
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 17, Day 1-8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 47, Day 10.0 units on a scale
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 19, Day 1-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.35
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 35, Day 14.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 21, Day 1-8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.43
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 43, Day 113.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.86
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 23, Day 1-7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.53
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 37, Day 115.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.78
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 25, Day 10.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.95
Secondary

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity Rate

MRD negativity rate is defined as the percentage of participants who have negative MRD by bone marrow aspirate at any time point after randomization and before progression or starting subsequent therapy. MRD negativity was defined at 10\^-5 threshold (less than one residual myeloma cell per 10\^5 total nucleated cells) as measured by centralized testing of bone marrow aspirate by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). MRD positive participants include those of which all tested samples were found to be MRD positive or indeterminate. Participants with missing or unevaluable MRD status were considered as MRD positive.

Time frame: Assessed at Screening; to confirm a stringent Complete Response (sCR) or Complete Response (CR); at 6 months and 12 months post-confirmed CR/sCR

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMinimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity Rate15.5 percentage of participants
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneMinimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity Rate2.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Stratified Analysis; Stratification factors: Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (naïve versus sensitive), and number of prior lines of therapy (1 versus 2 or 3)p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response \[VGPR\], Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).

Time frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR)81.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR)69.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Stratified Analysis; Stratification factors: Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (naïve versus sensitive), and number of prior lines of therapy (1 versus 2 or 3)p-value: =0.019Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS).

OS is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. All events of death were to be included, regardless of whether the event occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or after the participant discontinued study drug. If a participant is not known to have died, OS was censored at the date of last contact. The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Time frame: Median duration of follow-up was 45.6 months for the venetoclax group and 45.6 months for the placebo group

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneOverall Survival (OS).NA months
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneOverall Survival (OS).NA months
Comparison: Stratified Analysis; Stratification factors: Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (naïve versus sensitive), and number of prior lines of therapy (1 versus 2 or 3)p-value: =0.38595% CI: [0.802, 1.77]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With High B-cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) Expression

PFS is defined as the number of days from the date the participant was randomized to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) per investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. BCL-2 expression was determined through central laboratory testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and based on a pre-specified scoring algorithm. High clinical score of 2+: ≥50% of tumor cells with moderate or higher cytoplasmic staining but \< 50% of tumor cells with strong staining intensity; high clinical score of 3+: ≥50% of tumor cells with strong cytoplasmic staining.

Time frame: Median duration of follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization who had high BCL-2 expression

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With High B-cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) Expression23.8 months
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With High B-cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) Expression11.4 months
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. TTP was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Time frame: Median time on follow-up up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneTime to Progression (TTP)25.4 months
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneTime to Progression (TTP)12.2 months
Comparison: Stratified Analysis; Stratification factors: Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (naïve versus sensitive), and number of prior lines of therapy (1 versus 2 or 3)p-value: =0.00195% CI: [0.405, 0.805]Log Rank
Secondary

Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response Rate

The percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better (VGPR, Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) was computed.

Time frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set: all randomized participants, analyzed by treatment group assignment given at the time of randomization

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneVery Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response Rate60.3 percentage of participants
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneVery Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response Rate38.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Stratified Analysis; Stratification factors: Prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (naïve versus sensitive), and number of prior lines of therapy (1 versus 2 or 3)p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026