Skip to content

Pilot Study for a Prospective Surveillance Program for Rehabilitation Following Surgery for Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02754427
Enrollment
41
Registered
2016-04-28
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2019-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Surveillance, Physiotherapy, Arm morbidity

Brief summary

Breast cancer treatment often results in long-term arm morbidity. A prospective surveillance model with arm assessment pre-surgery followed by ongoing surveillance and targeted physiotherapy treatment after breast cancer surgery may improve early detection and management of arm morbidity. This study aims to determine the effect of prospective surveillance to target physiotherapy on the prevalence of arm morbidity in the surveillance group compared to control group at 12-months after breast cancer surgery.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProspective Surveillance Group

Participants received a pre-surgery arm assessment for shoulder mobility, upper body muscle strength, upper body function, and arm volume. Same assessment was repeated at 12 months post-surgery. After surgery, participants randomized to the surveillance group underwent the same arm assessment at 3, 6, and 9 months post-surgery. If arm morbidity was detected at any of those time points, then the participant was referred to individual physiotherapy treatment until the issue was resolved.

BEHAVIORALEducation Group

Participants received a pre-surgery arm assessment for shoulder mobility, upper body muscle strength, upper body function, and arm volume. Same assessment was repeated at 12 months post-surgery. After surgery, participants randomized to the education group were asked to attend three patient education sessions on nutrition, stress management, and fatigue management of approximately 1 hour, delivered at 3, 6, and 9 months by study staff.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age 30-75 years; receiving surgery for breast cancer, including those who will have immediate breast reconstruction.

Exclusion criteria

* prior breast cancer surgery; a pre-existing shoulder pathology on the side of breast surgery that limits shoulder range of motion \<75% of non-affected side; or a diagnosis of primary lymphedema

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Shoulder Mobility12 monthsArm morbidity due to decreased shoulder mobility was defined as ≥10% decrease in mobility from pre-surgery. This was measured using a goniometer and evaluated the degrees of shoulder mobility in flexion, abduction and external rotation.
Number of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Upper Body Muscle Strength12 monthsArm morbidity due to decreased upper body muscle strength was defined as ≥25% decrease in muscle strength from pre-surgery. This was measured using a hand-held dynamometer and evaluated in kilograms.
Number of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Upper Body Function12 monthsArm morbidity due to decreased upper body function was defined as ≥10 points decrease in function from pre-surgery. This was measured using the Upper Extremity Functional Index that scores 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater level of function.
Number of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Arm Volume12 monthsArm morbidity due to increase in arm volume was defined as a ≥200 mL increase from pre-surgery. Arm volume was measured using a perometer.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prospective Surveillance Group
Women assigned to surveillance group were assessed for arm morbidity at pre-surgery and at 3, 6, and 9 months post-surgery. If arm morbidity was detected at any time-point post-surgery, then a physiotherapy intervention was prescribed. Prospective Surveillance Group: Participants received a pre-surgery arm assessment for shoulder mobility, upper body muscle strength, upper body function, and arm volume. Same assessment was repeated at 12 months post-surgery. After surgery, participants randomized to the surveillance group underwent the same arm assessment at 3, 6, and 9 months post-surgery. If arm morbidity was detected at any of those time points, then the participant was referred to individual physiotherapy treatment until the issue was resolved.
21
Education Group
Participants in the education group received the usual post-operative follow-up. Education Group: Participants received a pre-surgery arm assessment for shoulder mobility, upper body muscle strength, upper body function, and arm volume. Same assessment was repeated at 12 months post-surgery. After surgery, participants randomized to the education group were asked to attend three patient education sessions on nutrition, stress management, and fatigue management of approximately 1 hour, delivered at 3, 6, and 9 months by study staff.
20
Total41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProspective Surveillance GroupEducation GroupTotal
Age, Continuous55.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
53.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants20 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants20 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Arm Volume

Arm morbidity due to increase in arm volume was defined as a ≥200 mL increase from pre-surgery. Arm volume was measured using a perometer.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Prospective Surveillance GroupNumber of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Arm Volume0 Participants
Education GroupNumber of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Arm Volume1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Shoulder Mobility

Arm morbidity due to decreased shoulder mobility was defined as ≥10% decrease in mobility from pre-surgery. This was measured using a goniometer and evaluated the degrees of shoulder mobility in flexion, abduction and external rotation.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Prospective Surveillance GroupNumber of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Shoulder Mobility5 Participants
Education GroupNumber of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Shoulder Mobility7 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Upper Body Function

Arm morbidity due to decreased upper body function was defined as ≥10 points decrease in function from pre-surgery. This was measured using the Upper Extremity Functional Index that scores 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater level of function.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Prospective Surveillance GroupNumber of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Upper Body Function5 Participants
Education GroupNumber of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Upper Body Function3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Upper Body Muscle Strength

Arm morbidity due to decreased upper body muscle strength was defined as ≥25% decrease in muscle strength from pre-surgery. This was measured using a hand-held dynamometer and evaluated in kilograms.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Prospective Surveillance GroupNumber of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Upper Body Muscle Strength1 Participants
Education GroupNumber of Participants With Arm Morbidity at 12 Months Post-surgery - Upper Body Muscle Strength4 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026