Plaque Psoriasis
Conditions
Keywords
secukinumab, AIN457, Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, immune-mediated systemic disease, scaly patches, papules, plaques, itching
Brief summary
Study of effects of secukinumab 300 mg s.c. on quality of life (QoL) in psoriasis in patients with or without prior exposure to systemic therapy.
Interventions
Secukinumab was used as commercially available PFS of 150 mg. Patients received PFS at the site and were instructed to administer Secukinumab as needed (300 mg each application).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Men or women aged at least 18 years at time of Screening. * Moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis diagnosed for at least 3 months prior to Screening and candidate for systemic therapy. * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria may apply. Please refer to the protocol.
Exclusion criteria
* Forms of psoriasis other than moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis, e.g. drug-induced psoriasis at Screening. * Patients with previous treatment with any agent targeting interleukin (IL)-17 directly or IL-17 receptor A (e.g. secukinumab, ixekizumab, or brodalumab). * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women * Women of child-bearing potential unless they use effective contraception
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 16 | 16 weeks | The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | 52 weeks | The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. |
| Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Week 16, Week 52 | PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity & affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area is scored by itself & scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), & severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration & desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 & 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16, Week 52 | The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort & anxiety/depression. The 5 dimensions have 5 response levels scored from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). The first 3 dimensions have the response levels lasting from no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems to unable; the last 2 dimensions have the 5 response levels lasting from no, slight, moderate, severe to extreme. From these 5 dimensions the Crosswalk-index is calculated by concatenating the responses & choosing the corresponding country specific index value from the EQ-5D-5L\_Crosswalk\_Index\_Value\_Calculator.v2 excel file (https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5labout/valuation-standard-value-sets/crosswalk-index-value-calculator/). This calculated participant-level index scores from -0.654 (worst health) to 1.0 (best health). |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16, Week 52 | A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D. This scale recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20-cm VAS where the endpoints were labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state. This resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state). |
| Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 52 | 52 weeks | The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | 16 and 52 weeks | Selfadministered 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10) were used to evaluate the patients' assessment of their current pain, itching & scaling. Respondents answered the following questions for the assessment: Pain: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related pain over the past 24 hours?; Itching: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related itch over the past 24 hours?; & Scaling: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis related scaling over the past 24 hours? Patients had to rate their pain, itching, & scaling from 0 to 10 (11-point scale), with the understanding that the 0 represents the absence or null end of the pain, itching, or scale intensity (i.e. no pain, itching or scaling) & the 10 represents the other extreme of pain, itching, or scaling intensity (i.e. pain, itching or scaling as bad as it could be). The number that the patient selected represents his or her intensity score in the respective category. |
| Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | 16 and 52 weeks | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is general measure for treatment satisfaction. Each scale score was calculated by summing individual items and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher summary scores indicate better satisfaction with study drug. |
| Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 and Week 52 | The questionnaire includes 23 items on patient-relevant therapy needs & benefits. The first part of the instrument, the 'Patient Needs Questionnaire' (PNQ), is filled in by the patient before therapy. A 5-step Likert scale (0='not important at all' to 4='very important') records the individual relevance of the different items to the patients. The second part, the PBQ, is filled in by the patient during or after therapy. It comprises the same items as the PNQ, but in contrast, the patients evaluate the extent to which the treatment needs have been fulfilled by therapy (scaled from 0='treatment did not help at all' to 4='treatment helped a lot'). In addition, the Likert scale contains the option 'does not apply to me' in the PNQ & the option 'did not apply to me' in the PBQ. The needs prior to treatment (PNQ) & the benefits achieved by treatment (PBQ) are converted to a weighted index value, the PBI in the narrower sense. PBI can have a value from 0='no benefit' to 4='maximal benefit'. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 and Week 52 | The HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index) assesses a patient's level of functional ability & includes questions on fine movements of the upper extremity, locomotor activities of the lower extremity & activities that involve both upper & lower extremities. There are 20 items in 8 categories of functioning including dressing & grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip & usual activities. The stem of each item asks over the past week, Are you able to... perform a particular task. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, representing normal, no difficulty (0), some difficulty (1), much difficulty (2) & unable to do (3). The HAQ-DI also includes questions about the use of 'aids or devices' & aid from other people to supplement the answers given to the 20 items. Total scores were calculated by averaging all scores and ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Subtracting the baseline value from the week 16 or 52 values results in the change. |
Countries
Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 1660 participants were treated and included in the Safety set.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 1858 patients were screened in this study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) Participants who were naïve to any systemic treatment, e.g. participants failing or intolerant to previous topical treatment, including narrow band UVB, but never exposed to any systemic treatment, with or without contraindications to the use of conventional systemic treatment and in a need of a first systemic treatment. | 663 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) Participants who have been previously exposed to at least one conventional systemic therapy; either because of failure or intolerance to their previous conventional systemic treatment, they were in a need of a first biologic systemic treatment. | 673 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) Participants who have been previously exposed to at least one biologic systemic therapy; either because of failure or intolerance to their previous biologic systemic treatment, they were in a need of a different biologic systemic treatment. | 324 |
| Total | 1,660 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 15 | 23 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 6 | 14 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 11 | 12 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Non-compliance with study treatment | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Pregnancy | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 10 | 13 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Subject/guardian decision | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 4 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Subpopulation A (Naive) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 44.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67 | 47.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89 | 43.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.03 | 44.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.74 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 12 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 642 Participants | 307 Participants | 626 Participants | 1575 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 23 Participants | 15 Participants | 22 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 222 Participants | 107 Participants | 224 Participants | 553 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 451 Participants | 217 Participants | 439 Participants | 1107 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 663 | 0 / 673 | 1 / 324 | 1 / 1,660 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 450 / 663 | 474 / 673 | 203 / 324 | 1,127 / 1,660 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 43 / 663 | 44 / 673 | 32 / 324 | 119 / 1,660 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 16
The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 16 | 74.7 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 16 | 71.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 16 | 61.7 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 16 | 70.8 Percentage of participants |
Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52
The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort & anxiety/depression. The 5 dimensions have 5 response levels scored from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). The first 3 dimensions have the response levels lasting from no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems to unable; the last 2 dimensions have the 5 response levels lasting from no, slight, moderate, severe to extreme. From these 5 dimensions the Crosswalk-index is calculated by concatenating the responses & choosing the corresponding country specific index value from the EQ-5D-5L\_Crosswalk\_Index\_Value\_Calculator.v2 excel file (https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5labout/valuation-standard-value-sets/crosswalk-index-value-calculator/). This calculated participant-level index scores from -0.654 (worst health) to 1.0 (best health).
Time frame: Week 16, Week 52
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 0.221 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2353 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 0.217 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2294 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 0.201 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2277 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 0.193 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.236 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 0.226 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2596 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 0.235 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2602 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 0.211 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2408 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 0.214 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2352 |
Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52
A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D. This scale recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20-cm VAS where the endpoints were labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state. This resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state).
Time frame: Week 16, Week 52
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 19.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.36 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 21.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.11 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 22.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.47 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 21.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.66 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 18.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.66 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 19.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.14 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 20.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.36 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 21.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.88 |
Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52
The HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index) assesses a patient's level of functional ability & includes questions on fine movements of the upper extremity, locomotor activities of the lower extremity & activities that involve both upper & lower extremities. There are 20 items in 8 categories of functioning including dressing & grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip & usual activities. The stem of each item asks over the past week, Are you able to... perform a particular task. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, representing normal, no difficulty (0), some difficulty (1), much difficulty (2) & unable to do (3). The HAQ-DI also includes questions about the use of 'aids or devices' & aid from other people to supplement the answers given to the 20 items. Total scores were calculated by averaging all scores and ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Subtracting the baseline value from the week 16 or 52 values results in the change.
Time frame: Week 16 and Week 52
Population: Full Analysis set - subset of patients with psoriatic arthritis at baseline: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | -0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | -0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52
Selfadministered 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10) were used to evaluate the patients' assessment of their current pain, itching & scaling. Respondents answered the following questions for the assessment: Pain: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related pain over the past 24 hours?; Itching: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related itch over the past 24 hours?; & Scaling: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis related scaling over the past 24 hours? Patients had to rate their pain, itching, & scaling from 0 to 10 (11-point scale), with the understanding that the 0 represents the absence or null end of the pain, itching, or scale intensity (i.e. no pain, itching or scaling) & the 10 represents the other extreme of pain, itching, or scaling intensity (i.e. pain, itching or scaling as bad as it could be). The number that the patient selected represents his or her intensity score in the respective category.
Time frame: 16 and 52 weeks
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Scaling: Wk 52 | -5.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Pain: Wk 16 | -3.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Itching: Wk 52 | -5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.92 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Itching: Wk 16 | -4.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.96 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Scaling: Wk 16 | -5.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.68 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Pain: Wk 52 | -3.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Pain: Wk 16 | -3.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.11 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Itching: Wk 52 | -5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Pain: Wk 52 | -3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.22 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Itching: Wk 16 | -4.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.06 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Scaling: Wk 16 | -5.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.71 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Scaling: Wk 52 | -5.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Pain: Wk 16 | -3.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Scaling: Wk 52 | -4.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.27 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Itching: Wk 52 | -4.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.28 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Scaling: Wk 16 | -5.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.26 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Pain: Wk 52 | -3.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.36 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Itching: Wk 16 | -4.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.31 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Pain: Wk 52 | -3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.14 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Itching: Wk 16 | -4.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Pain: Wk 16 | -3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.06 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Itching: Wk 52 | -4.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Scaling: Wk 16 | -5.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.81 |
| All Participants | Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Scaling: Wk 52 | -5.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52
The questionnaire includes 23 items on patient-relevant therapy needs & benefits. The first part of the instrument, the 'Patient Needs Questionnaire' (PNQ), is filled in by the patient before therapy. A 5-step Likert scale (0='not important at all' to 4='very important') records the individual relevance of the different items to the patients. The second part, the PBQ, is filled in by the patient during or after therapy. It comprises the same items as the PNQ, but in contrast, the patients evaluate the extent to which the treatment needs have been fulfilled by therapy (scaled from 0='treatment did not help at all' to 4='treatment helped a lot'). In addition, the Likert scale contains the option 'does not apply to me' in the PNQ & the option 'did not apply to me' in the PBQ. The needs prior to treatment (PNQ) & the benefits achieved by treatment (PBQ) are converted to a weighted index value, the PBI in the narrower sense. PBI can have a value from 0='no benefit' to 4='maximal benefit'.
Time frame: Week 16 and Week 52
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 3.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 3.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 3.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 3.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| All Participants | Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 16 | 3.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| All Participants | Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52 | Week 52 | 3.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52
The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 6-10 | 4.7 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 21-30 | 0.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 2-5 | 17.9 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 11-20 | 1.2 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 11-20 | 1.8 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 6-10 | 5.7 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16:DLQI cat. score: 21-30 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 2-5 | 18.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16:DLQI cat. score: 21-30 | 0.5 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 2-5 | 14.0 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 2-5 | 19.1 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 21-30 | 1.5 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 6-10 | 6.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 6-10 | 7.2 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 11-20 | 2.9 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 11-20 | 4.0 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16:DLQI cat. score: 21-30 | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 2-5 | 21.2 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 6-10 | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 11-20 | 5.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 2-5 | 18.2 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 6-10 | 9.6 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 11-20 | 8.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 21-30 | 1.9 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 6-10 | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 2-5 | 19.2 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 21-30 | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 11-20 | 4.0 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16:DLQI cat. score: 21-30 | 0.7 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 2-5 | 16.4 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 6-10 | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52 | Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 11-20 | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 52
The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 52 | 75.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 52 | 73.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 52 | 62.0 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 52 | 71.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52
PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity & affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area is scored by itself & scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), & severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration & desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 & 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Time frame: Week 16, Week 52
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 50 | 97.7 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 75 | 94.4 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 90 | 82.4 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 100 | 47.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: IGA 0/1 | 87.4 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 50 | 97.9 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 75 | 94.4 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 90 | 80.8 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 100 | 56.9 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: IGA 0/1 | 86.4 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 90 | 78.8 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 100 | 45.5 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 100 | 38.8 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: IGA 0/1 | 84.9 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 50 | 96.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 75 | 89.7 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: IGA 0/1 | 79.9 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 90 | 75.5 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 50 | 97.5 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 75 | 92.8 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 90 | 63.9 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 75 | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: IGA 0/1 | 71.3 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 50 | 95.0 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 100 | 33.4 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 50 | 92.9 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 100 | 37.0 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 75 | 85.4 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: IGA 0/1 | 76.2 Percentage of participants |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 90 | 69.0 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: IGA 0/1 | 84.2 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 90 | 75.3 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 50 | 96.3 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: IGA 0/1 | 80.8 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 75 | 90.4 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 75 | 92.0 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 90 | 78.3 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 100 | 41.1 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 16: PASI 50 | 97.1 Percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52 | Wk 52: PASI 100 | 48.4 Percentage of participants |
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is general measure for treatment satisfaction. Each scale score was calculated by summing individual items and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher summary scores indicate better satisfaction with study drug.
Time frame: 16 and 52 weeks
Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Convenience: Wk 52 | 82.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.67 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Effectiveness: Wk 52 | 85.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.64 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Global satisfaction: Wk 52 | 83.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.23 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Effectiveness: Wk 16 | 81.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.02 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Convenience: Wk 16 | 79.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Subpopulation A (Naive) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Global satisfaction: Wk 16 | 83.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.71 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Convenience: Wk 16 | 80.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.83 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Global satisfaction: Wk 16 | 83.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.68 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Global satisfaction: Wk 52 | 81.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.38 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Effectiveness: Wk 16 | 80.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.13 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Effectiveness: Wk 52 | 82.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.05 |
| Subpopulation B (Non-biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Convenience: Wk 52 | 83.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.42 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Convenience: Wk 16 | 75.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.2 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Effectiveness: Wk 16 | 75.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.43 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Global satisfaction: Wk 16 | 75.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.07 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Convenience: Wk 52 | 78.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.14 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Global satisfaction: Wk 52 | 73.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Subpopulation C (Biologic) | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Effectiveness: Wk 52 | 74.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.24 |
| All Participants | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Effectiveness: Wk 52 | 81.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| All Participants | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Convenience: Wk 16 | 79.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.67 |
| All Participants | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Effectiveness: Wk 16 | 80.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.48 |
| All Participants | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Global satisfaction: Wk 52 | 81.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.14 |
| All Participants | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Convenience: Wk 52 | 82.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.57 |
| All Participants | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52 | Global satisfaction: Wk 16 | 81.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.99 |