Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Clear Skin Effect on Quality of Life in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis.

An Open-label, Prospective, Non-randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Clear Skin Effect on Health Related Quality of Life Outcomes at 16 and 52 Weeks in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Treated With Secukinumab 300 mg s.c. With or Without Previous Exposure to Systemic Therapy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02752776
Acronym
PROSE
Enrollment
1660
Registered
2016-04-27
Start date
2016-03-17
Completion date
2018-03-28
Last updated
2019-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plaque Psoriasis

Keywords

secukinumab, AIN457, Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, immune-mediated systemic disease, scaly patches, papules, plaques, itching

Brief summary

Study of effects of secukinumab 300 mg s.c. on quality of life (QoL) in psoriasis in patients with or without prior exposure to systemic therapy.

Interventions

DRUGSecukinumab

Secukinumab was used as commercially available PFS of 150 mg. Patients received PFS at the site and were instructed to administer Secukinumab as needed (300 mg each application).

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men or women aged at least 18 years at time of Screening. * Moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis diagnosed for at least 3 months prior to Screening and candidate for systemic therapy. * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria may apply. Please refer to the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Forms of psoriasis other than moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis, e.g. drug-induced psoriasis at Screening. * Patients with previous treatment with any agent targeting interleukin (IL)-17 directly or IL-17 receptor A (e.g. secukinumab, ixekizumab, or brodalumab). * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women * Women of child-bearing potential unless they use effective contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 1616 weeksThe DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 5252 weeksThe DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.
Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Week 16, Week 52PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity & affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area is scored by itself & scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), & severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration & desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 & 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 16, Week 52The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort & anxiety/depression. The 5 dimensions have 5 response levels scored from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). The first 3 dimensions have the response levels lasting from no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems to unable; the last 2 dimensions have the 5 response levels lasting from no, slight, moderate, severe to extreme. From these 5 dimensions the Crosswalk-index is calculated by concatenating the responses & choosing the corresponding country specific index value from the EQ-5D-5L\_Crosswalk\_Index\_Value\_Calculator.v2 excel file (https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5labout/valuation-standard-value-sets/crosswalk-index-value-calculator/). This calculated participant-level index scores from -0.654 (worst health) to 1.0 (best health).
Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 16, Week 52A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D. This scale recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20-cm VAS where the endpoints were labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state. This resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state).
Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 5252 weeksThe DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 5216 and 52 weeksSelfadministered 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10) were used to evaluate the patients' assessment of their current pain, itching & scaling. Respondents answered the following questions for the assessment: Pain: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related pain over the past 24 hours?; Itching: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related itch over the past 24 hours?; & Scaling: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis related scaling over the past 24 hours? Patients had to rate their pain, itching, & scaling from 0 to 10 (11-point scale), with the understanding that the 0 represents the absence or null end of the pain, itching, or scale intensity (i.e. no pain, itching or scaling) & the 10 represents the other extreme of pain, itching, or scaling intensity (i.e. pain, itching or scaling as bad as it could be). The number that the patient selected represents his or her intensity score in the respective category.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 5216 and 52 weeksTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is general measure for treatment satisfaction. Each scale score was calculated by summing individual items and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher summary scores indicate better satisfaction with study drug.
Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 16 and Week 52The questionnaire includes 23 items on patient-relevant therapy needs & benefits. The first part of the instrument, the 'Patient Needs Questionnaire' (PNQ), is filled in by the patient before therapy. A 5-step Likert scale (0='not important at all' to 4='very important') records the individual relevance of the different items to the patients. The second part, the PBQ, is filled in by the patient during or after therapy. It comprises the same items as the PNQ, but in contrast, the patients evaluate the extent to which the treatment needs have been fulfilled by therapy (scaled from 0='treatment did not help at all' to 4='treatment helped a lot'). In addition, the Likert scale contains the option 'does not apply to me' in the PNQ & the option 'did not apply to me' in the PBQ. The needs prior to treatment (PNQ) & the benefits achieved by treatment (PBQ) are converted to a weighted index value, the PBI in the narrower sense. PBI can have a value from 0='no benefit' to 4='maximal benefit'.
Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 16 and Week 52The HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index) assesses a patient's level of functional ability & includes questions on fine movements of the upper extremity, locomotor activities of the lower extremity & activities that involve both upper & lower extremities. There are 20 items in 8 categories of functioning including dressing & grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip & usual activities. The stem of each item asks over the past week, Are you able to... perform a particular task. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, representing normal, no difficulty (0), some difficulty (1), much difficulty (2) & unable to do (3). The HAQ-DI also includes questions about the use of 'aids or devices' & aid from other people to supplement the answers given to the 20 items. Total scores were calculated by averaging all scores and ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Subtracting the baseline value from the week 16 or 52 values results in the change.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1660 participants were treated and included in the Safety set.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1858 patients were screened in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subpopulation A (Naive)
Participants who were naïve to any systemic treatment, e.g. participants failing or intolerant to previous topical treatment, including narrow band UVB, but never exposed to any systemic treatment, with or without contraindications to the use of conventional systemic treatment and in a need of a first systemic treatment.
663
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)
Participants who have been previously exposed to at least one conventional systemic therapy; either because of failure or intolerance to their previous conventional systemic treatment, they were in a need of a first biologic systemic treatment.
673
Subpopulation C (Biologic)
Participants who have been previously exposed to at least one biologic systemic therapy; either because of failure or intolerance to their previous biologic systemic treatment, they were in a need of a different biologic systemic treatment.
324
Total1,660

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event152311
Overall StudyDeath001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2614
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11124
Overall StudyNon-compliance with study treatment001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision262
Overall StudyPregnancy163
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10136
Overall StudySubject/guardian decision864
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject342

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubpopulation B (Non-biologic)Subpopulation C (Biologic)Subpopulation A (Naive)Total
Age, Continuous44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.03
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.74
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
6 Participants2 Participants12 Participants20 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
642 Participants307 Participants626 Participants1575 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
23 Participants15 Participants22 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
222 Participants107 Participants224 Participants553 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
451 Participants217 Participants439 Participants1107 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 6630 / 6731 / 3241 / 1,660
other
Total, other adverse events
450 / 663474 / 673203 / 3241,127 / 1,660
serious
Total, serious adverse events
43 / 66344 / 67332 / 324119 / 1,660

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 16

The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 1674.7 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 1671.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 1661.7 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 1670.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52

The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort & anxiety/depression. The 5 dimensions have 5 response levels scored from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). The first 3 dimensions have the response levels lasting from no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems to unable; the last 2 dimensions have the 5 response levels lasting from no, slight, moderate, severe to extreme. From these 5 dimensions the Crosswalk-index is calculated by concatenating the responses & choosing the corresponding country specific index value from the EQ-5D-5L\_Crosswalk\_Index\_Value\_Calculator.v2 excel file (https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5labout/valuation-standard-value-sets/crosswalk-index-value-calculator/). This calculated participant-level index scores from -0.654 (worst health) to 1.0 (best health).

Time frame: Week 16, Week 52

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 520.221 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2353
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 160.217 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2294
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 160.201 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2277
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 520.193 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.236
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 520.226 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2596
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 160.235 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2602
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 520.211 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2408
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index at Week 16 and Week 52Week 160.214 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2352
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52

A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D. This scale recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20-cm VAS where the endpoints were labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state. This resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state).

Time frame: Week 16, Week 52

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 1619.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.36
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 5221.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.11
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 5222.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.47
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 1621.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.66
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 1618.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.66
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 5219.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.14
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 1620.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.36
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 5221.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.88
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52

The HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index) assesses a patient's level of functional ability & includes questions on fine movements of the upper extremity, locomotor activities of the lower extremity & activities that involve both upper & lower extremities. There are 20 items in 8 categories of functioning including dressing & grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip & usual activities. The stem of each item asks over the past week, Are you able to... perform a particular task. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, representing normal, no difficulty (0), some difficulty (1), much difficulty (2) & unable to do (3). The HAQ-DI also includes questions about the use of 'aids or devices' & aid from other people to supplement the answers given to the 20 items. Total scores were calculated by averaging all scores and ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Subtracting the baseline value from the week 16 or 52 values results in the change.

Time frame: Week 16 and Week 52

Population: Full Analysis set - subset of patients with psoriatic arthritis at baseline: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 16-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 52-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 16-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 52-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 16-0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 52-0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 52-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 and Week 52Week 16-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52

Selfadministered 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10) were used to evaluate the patients' assessment of their current pain, itching & scaling. Respondents answered the following questions for the assessment: Pain: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related pain over the past 24 hours?; Itching: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related itch over the past 24 hours?; & Scaling: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis related scaling over the past 24 hours? Patients had to rate their pain, itching, & scaling from 0 to 10 (11-point scale), with the understanding that the 0 represents the absence or null end of the pain, itching, or scale intensity (i.e. no pain, itching or scaling) & the 10 represents the other extreme of pain, itching, or scaling intensity (i.e. pain, itching or scaling as bad as it could be). The number that the patient selected represents his or her intensity score in the respective category.

Time frame: 16 and 52 weeks

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Scaling: Wk 52-5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Pain: Wk 16-3.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Itching: Wk 52-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Itching: Wk 16-4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Scaling: Wk 16-5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Subpopulation A (Naive)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Pain: Wk 52-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Pain: Wk 16-3.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Itching: Wk 52-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Pain: Wk 52-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Itching: Wk 16-4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Scaling: Wk 16-5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Scaling: Wk 52-5.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Pain: Wk 16-3.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Scaling: Wk 52-4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Itching: Wk 52-4.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Scaling: Wk 16-5.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.26
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Pain: Wk 52-3.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Absolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Itching: Wk 16-4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.31
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Pain: Wk 52-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Itching: Wk 16-4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.07
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Pain: Wk 16-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Itching: Wk 52-4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.07
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Scaling: Wk 16-5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
All ParticipantsAbsolute Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 and Week 52Scaling: Wk 52-5.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52

The questionnaire includes 23 items on patient-relevant therapy needs & benefits. The first part of the instrument, the 'Patient Needs Questionnaire' (PNQ), is filled in by the patient before therapy. A 5-step Likert scale (0='not important at all' to 4='very important') records the individual relevance of the different items to the patients. The second part, the PBQ, is filled in by the patient during or after therapy. It comprises the same items as the PNQ, but in contrast, the patients evaluate the extent to which the treatment needs have been fulfilled by therapy (scaled from 0='treatment did not help at all' to 4='treatment helped a lot'). In addition, the Likert scale contains the option 'does not apply to me' in the PNQ & the option 'did not apply to me' in the PBQ. The needs prior to treatment (PNQ) & the benefits achieved by treatment (PBQ) are converted to a weighted index value, the PBI in the narrower sense. PBI can have a value from 0='no benefit' to 4='maximal benefit'.

Time frame: Week 16 and Week 52

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subpopulation A (Naive)Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 163.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Subpopulation A (Naive)Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 523.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 523.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 163.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 163.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 523.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
All ParticipantsPatient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 163.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
All ParticipantsPatient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16 and Week 52Week 523.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52

The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 6-104.7 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 21-300.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 2-517.9 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 11-201.2 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 11-201.8 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 6-105.7 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16:DLQI cat. score: 21-300.0 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 2-518.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16:DLQI cat. score: 21-300.5 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 2-514.0 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 2-519.1 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 21-301.5 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 6-106.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 6-107.2 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 11-202.9 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 11-204.0 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16:DLQI cat. score: 21-302.5 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 2-521.2 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 6-109.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 11-205.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 2-518.2 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 6-109.6 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 11-208.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 21-301.9 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 6-106.7 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 2-519.2 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 21-301.1 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52:DLQI cat. score: 11-204.0 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16:DLQI cat. score: 21-300.7 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 52: DLQI cat. score: 2-516.4 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 6-106.7 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each DLQI Score Category at Week 16 and Week 52Wk 16: DLQI cat. score: 11-202.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 52

The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 5275.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 5273.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 5262.0 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (DLQI 0/1) Response at Week 5271.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity & affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area is scored by itself & scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), & severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration & desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 & 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.

Time frame: Week 16, Week 52

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 5097.7 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 7594.4 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 9082.4 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 10047.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: IGA 0/187.4 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 5097.9 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 7594.4 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 9080.8 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 10056.9 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation A (Naive)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: IGA 0/186.4 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 9078.8 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 10045.5 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 10038.8 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: IGA 0/184.9 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 5096.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 7589.7 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: IGA 0/179.9 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 9075.5 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 5097.5 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 7592.8 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 9063.9 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 7583.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: IGA 0/171.3 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 5095.0 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 10033.4 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 5092.9 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 10037.0 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 7585.4 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: IGA 0/176.2 Percentage of participants
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Percentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 9069.0 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: IGA 0/184.2 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 9075.3 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 5096.3 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: IGA 0/180.8 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 7590.4 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 7592.0 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 9078.3 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 10041.1 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 16: PASI 5097.1 Percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 or IGA Mod 2011 0/1 Response at Week 16 and 52Wk 52: PASI 10048.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is general measure for treatment satisfaction. Each scale score was calculated by summing individual items and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher summary scores indicate better satisfaction with study drug.

Time frame: 16 and 52 weeks

Population: Full Analysis set: The Full Analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subpopulation A (Naive)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Convenience: Wk 5282.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.67
Subpopulation A (Naive)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Effectiveness: Wk 5285.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.64
Subpopulation A (Naive)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Global satisfaction: Wk 5283.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.23
Subpopulation A (Naive)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Effectiveness: Wk 1681.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.02
Subpopulation A (Naive)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Convenience: Wk 1679.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Subpopulation A (Naive)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Global satisfaction: Wk 1683.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.71
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Convenience: Wk 1680.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.83
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Global satisfaction: Wk 1683.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.68
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Global satisfaction: Wk 5281.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.38
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Effectiveness: Wk 1680.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.13
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Effectiveness: Wk 5282.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.05
Subpopulation B (Non-biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Convenience: Wk 5283.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.42
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Convenience: Wk 1675.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Effectiveness: Wk 1675.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.43
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Global satisfaction: Wk 1675.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.07
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Convenience: Wk 5278.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.14
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Global satisfaction: Wk 5273.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Subpopulation C (Biologic)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Effectiveness: Wk 5274.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.24
All ParticipantsTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Effectiveness: Wk 5281.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
All ParticipantsTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Convenience: Wk 1679.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.67
All ParticipantsTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Effectiveness: Wk 1680.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.48
All ParticipantsTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Global satisfaction: Wk 5281.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.14
All ParticipantsTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Convenience: Wk 5282.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.57
All ParticipantsTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scale Scores at Week 16 and Week 52Global satisfaction: Wk 1681.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.99

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026