Skip to content

A Study of ASP2215 (Gilteritinib) by Itself, ASP2215 Combined With Azacitidine or Azacitidine by Itself to Treat Adult Patients Who Have Recently Been Diagnosed With Acute Myeloid Leukemia With a FLT3 Gene Mutation and Who Cannot Receive Standard Chemotherapy

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Study of ASP2215 (Gilteritinib), Combination of ASP2215 Plus Azacitidine and Azacitidine Alone in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia With FLT3 Mutation in Patients Not Eligible for Intensive Induction Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02752035
Enrollment
183
Registered
2016-04-26
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2024-12-18
Last updated
2026-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Myeloid Leukemia With FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase (FLT3) Mutation

Keywords

AML, ASP2215, Newly Diagnosed AML, gilteritinib, Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), FLT3

Brief summary

This was a clinical study for adult participants who were recently diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia or AML. AML is a type of cancer. It is when bone marrow makes white blood cells that are not normal. These are called leukemia cells. Some participants with AML have a mutation, or change, in the FLT3 gene. This gene helps leukemia cells make a protein called FLT3. This protein causes the leukemia cells to grow faster. For participants with AML who could not receive standard chemotherapy, azacitidine (also known as Vidaza®) was a current standard of care treatment option in the United States. This clinical study tested an experimental medicine called ASP2215, also known as gilteritinib. Gilteritinib worked by stopping the leukemia cells from making the FLT3 protein. This helped stop the leukemia cells from growing faster. This study compared two different treatments. Participants were assigned to one of these two groups by chance: a medicine called azacitidine, also known as Vidaza®, or an experimental medicine gilteritinib in combination with azacitidine. There was a twice as much chance to receive both medicines combined than azacitidine alone. The clinical study may help show which treatment helps patients live longer.

Detailed description

Participants considered an adult according to local regulation at the time of obtaining informed consent participated in the study. Safety Cohort Prior to initiation of the randomized trial, 15 participants were enrolled to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ASP2215 given with azacitidine therapy in the study population. Randomized Trial Approximately 250 participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive ASP2215 plus azacitidine (Arm AC) or azacitidine only (Arm C). Participants entered the screening period up to 14 days prior to the start of treatment. Participants administered treatment over 28-day cycles. Earlier protocol versions included a 1:1:1 randomization ratio to receive Arm A: ASP2215, Arm AC: ASP2215 + azacitidine or Arm C: azacitidine. Participants previously randomized to Arm A continued following treatment and assessments as outlined in the protocol.

Interventions

DRUGgilteritinib

Tablet, oral

DRUGazacitidine

Subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is considered an adult according to local regulation at the time of obtaining informed consent. * Subject has a diagnosis of previously-untreated AML according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification \[Swerdlow et al, 2008\] as determined by pathology review at the treating institution. * Subject is positive for FLT3 mutation (internal tandem duplication \[ITD\] or tyrosine kinase domain \[TKD\] \[D835/I836\] mutation) (or for Korea only: ITD alone or ITD with concurrent TKD activating mutation) in bone marrow or whole blood as determined by central laboratory. Note: Only requirement of FLT3 mutation assessment by central laboratory is only applicable to the randomization portion of the study. * Subject is ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy by meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: * Subject is ≥ 65 years of age and ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy. * Subject is ≥ 18 to 64 years of age and has any of the following comorbidities: \[Ex-US Only\]: Congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association {NYHA} class ≤ 3) or ejection fraction (Ef) ≤ 50%; \[US Only\]: Severe cardiac disorder e.g. congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class ≤ 3) requiring treatment, ejection fraction ≤ 50%, or chronic stable angina; \[Ex-US Only\]: Creatinine \> 2 mg/dL (177 µmol/L), dialysis or prior renal transplant; \[US Only\]: Creatinine clearance \< 45 mL/min; ECOG performance status ≥ 2; * \[Ex-US Only\]: Known pulmonary disease with decreased diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and/or requiring oxygen ≤ 2 liters per minute; \[US Only\] Severe pulmonary disorder (e.g., diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide \[DLCO\] ≤ 65% or forced expiratory volume in the first second \[FEV1\] ≤ 65%); Prior or current malignancy that does not require concurrent treatment; Subject has received a cumulative anthracycline dose above 400 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (or cumulative maximum dose of another anthracycline). Any other comorbidity incompatible with intensive chemotherapy must be reviewed and approved by the Medical Monitor during screening and before randomization. * Subject must meet the following criteria as indicated on the clinical laboratory tests: * Serum AST and ALT ≤ 3.0 x Institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) * Serum total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x Institutional ULN * Serum potassium ≥ Institutional lower limit of normal (LLN) * Serum magnesium ≥ Institutional LLN Repletion of potassium and magnesium levels during the screening period is allowed. * Subject is suitable for oral administration of study drug. * Female subject is eligible to participate if female subject is not pregnant and at least one of the following conditions applies: * Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP); OR * WOCBP agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance starting at screening and continue throughout the study period, and for at least 180 days after the final study drug administration. * Female subject must agree not to breastfeed starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 60 days after the final study drug administration. * Female subject must not donate ova starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 180 days after the final study drug administration. * Male subject with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use contraception as detailed in Contraception Requirements, starting at screening and continue throughout the study period, and for 120 days after the final study drug administration. * Male subject must not donate sperm starting at screening and throughout the study period and for 120 days after the final study drug administration. * Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject was diagnosed as acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). * Subject has BCR-ABL-positive leukemia (chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis). * Subject has received previous therapy for AML, with the exception of the following: * Emergency leukapheresis * Hydroxyurea * Preemptive treatment with retinoic acid prior to exclusion of APL ≤ 7 days * Growth factor or cytokine support * Steroids * Subject has clinically active central nervous system leukemia. * Subject has been diagnosed with another malignancy that requires concurrent treatment (with the exception of hormone therapy limited to those therapies that prevent recurrence and/or spread of cancer) or hepatic malignancy regardless of need for treatment. * Subject requires treatment with concomitant drugs that are strong inducers of cytochrome P450 CYP3A/P-glycoprotein (P-gp). * Subject requires treatment with concomitant drugs that are strong inhibitors or inducers of P-gp with the exception of drugs that are considered absolutely essential for the care of the subject. * Subject requires treatment with concomitant drugs that target serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2B (5HT2BR) or sigma nonspecific receptor with the exception of drugs that are considered absolutely essential for the care of the subject. * Subject has congestive heart failure classified as New York Heart Association Class IV. * Subject with mean Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) \> 480 ms at screening based on central reading. * Subject with a history of Long QT Syndrome at screening. * \[Ex-US Only\]: Subject has known pulmonary function tests with diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≤ 50%, forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) ≤ 60%, dyspnea at rest or requiring oxygen or any pleural neoplasm (Transient use of supplemental oxygen is allowed.) * Subject has active hepatitis B or C or other active hepatic disorder. * Subjects with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or detectable hepatitis B DNA are not eligible. * Subjects with negative HBsAg, positive hepatitis B core antibody and negative hepatitis B surface antibody will be eligible if hepatitis B DNA is undetectable. * Subjects with antibodies to hepatitis C virus will be eligible if hepatitis C RNA is undetectable * Subject has any condition which makes the subject unsuitable for study participation, including any contraindications of azacitidine. * Subject has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to ASP2215, azacitidine or any components of the formulations used. * \[US Only\]: Subject is ≥ 65 to 74 years of age, suitable for and willing to receive intensive induction chemotherapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause ( maximum duration up to 79 months)OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. For a participant who was not known to have died by the end of study follow-up, OS was censored at the date of last contact. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates was used for analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-free Survival (EFS)From the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse from CR, treatment failure or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 39.7 months)EFS: time from the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse from Complete Remission (CR), treatment failure(failing to achieve CR within 6 cycles of treatment) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: bone marrow(BM) regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. Relapse: reappearance of leukemic blasts \>2% in the peripheral blood/≥ 5% myeloblasts in the BM unattributable to any other cause/new/reappearance of extramedullary leukemia.
Percentage of Participants With Best ResponseFrom the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (up to 57 months)Best response for a participant was defined as the best measured response (in the order of CR, CR with Incomplete Platelet Recovery (CRp), CR with Incomplete Hematologic Recovery (CRi), and treatment failure) from all post-baseline visits. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. CRp: achieved CR except incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). CRi: achieved CR except incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 x 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence not required.
Completed Remission (CR) RateFrom the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (approximately 49.7 months)CR rate: number of participants who achieved the best response of CR divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. Participants with unknown or missing response, or who provided no information on response at the end of treatment were included in the denominator when calculating rates. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent(1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods.
CRc RateFrom the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (approximately 54.5 months)CRc rate was defined as participants with best response of (CR + CRp + CRi) divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. Participants were classified as: CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. CRp: achieved CR except incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). CRi: achieved CR except incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 x 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence not required. Percentage of participants with CRc was reported.
Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (up to 49.7 months)CRh was defined as the response at a post baseline visit as CRh having bone marrow myeloblast count \< 5%, partial hematologic recovery ANC ≥ 0.5 x 10\^9/L and platelets ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L, no evidence of extramedullary leukemia and cannot be classified as CR. The blast counts in peripheral blood must be ≤ 2% or missing. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. Percentage of participants with CRh was reported.
CR/CRh RateFrom the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (up to 49.7 months)CR/CRh rate: number of participants who achieved CR or CRh divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. CR/CRh: CR/CRh if it fulfilled criteria for CR or CRh at the visit. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. CRh: response at a post baseline visit as CRh having bone marrow myeloblast count \< 5%, partial hematologic recovery ANC ≥ 0.5 x 10\^9/L and platelets ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L, no evidence of extramedullary leukemia and cannot be classified as CR. The blast counts in peripheral blood must be ≤ 2% or missing. Percentage of participants with CR/CRh was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Conversion RateFrom baseline up to 57 monthsTransfusion conversion rate was defined as the number of participants who were transfusion dependent at baseline period but became transfusion independent at post-baseline period divided by the total number of participants who were transfusion dependent at baseline period.
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Maintenance RateFrom baseline up to 57 monthsTransfusion maintenance rate was defined as the number of participants who were transfusion independent at baseline period and remained transfusion independent post-baseline period divided by the total number of participants who were transfusion independent at baseline period.
Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)From first day of achieving first CRc to the first day of confirmed relapse/death (up to 54.5 months)LFS: time from the date of first CRc (CR + CRp + CRi) until the date of documented relapse (excluding relapse from PR) or death for participants who achieved CRc. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. CRp: achieved CR except incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). CRi: achieved CR except incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 x 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence not required. CRc: fulfilled criteria for CR, CRp or CRi. Based on KM estimates.
Duration of RemissionFrom first day of achieving first response to the first day of confirmed relapse/death (up to 56.4 months)Duration of remission included CRc, CR, CRh, CR/CRh, and response duration \[CRc + PR\]. Duration of CRc, CR, CRh: the time from the date of first CRc until the date of first documented relapse for participants who achieved CRc, CR, and CRh, respectively. CR/CRh: fulfilled criteria for CR or CRh at the visit. CRh: marrow blasts \<5%, ANC ≥0.5×10\^9/L, platelets ≥50×10\^9/L, not meeting CR criteria. PR: If marrow myeloblasts between \<5% and 25% and ≤2% or missing peripheral blood blast and a decrease from baseline of at least 50% in the marrow myeloblasts and no evidence of extramedullary leukemia, the response was classified as PR. If marrow myeloblasts \<5% and ≤2% or missing peripheral blood blast and no evidence of extramedullary leukemia, the response was classified as PR even with Auer rods.
Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)From baseline to 31 monthsThe BFI was a tool to assess fatigue severity and impact on daily function in cancer participants over 24 hours. It included 9 items. A global fatigue score was computed by averaging the scores of the 9 items measured on the numeric rating scale. Scores were calculated if ≥5 of 9 items were answered. A higher score indicates a higher degree of fatigue. The first 3 rate fatigue from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (worst imaginable), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The remaining 6 assess how fatigue interferes with daily activities from 0 (no interference) to 10 (completely interferes). A global fatigue score (0-10) was the average of all items, with higher scores indicating worse fatigue. Overall BFI score is reported.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose up to end of study duration (101 months)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable \& unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. TEAE was defined as an adverse event observed after starting administration of the study drug until 30 days from the last study treatment
Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresFrom baseline to end of treatment (up to 57 months)ECOG performance scores at each assessment time were be provided by treatment group. Negative change scores indicated an improvement and positive scores indicate a decline in performance. The grades were defined as follows: 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. Dead.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORMedical Director

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with newly diagnosed, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not eligible for intensive induction were enrolled.

Pre-assignment details

Prior to randomized cohort, participants were enrolled for safety cohort to evaluate safety and tolerability of gilteritinib given with azacitidine therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Safety Cohort: Gilteritinib + Azacitidine (AZA)
Participants received 80 mg (2 tablets of 40 mg) of gilteritinib orally once daily for continuous 28-day cycles and 75 mg/m\^2 of AZA daily via subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion for 7 days of each 28-day treatment cycle. Depending on the safety cohort data ,the decision to initiate the randomized trial at the targeted dose was made. After the end of treatment period, participants were followed up for 30- day follow up period. Participants were allowed to enter the long-term follow-up period of up to 3 years for collection of subsequent AML treatment, EQ-5D-5L, remission status and survival (cause of death and date of death). Participants in long-term follow-up who were no longer receiving treatment were followed every 3 months for survival until the implementation of the final protocol version 13.0, at which time they were discontinued from the study, as further survival data were no longer needed.
15
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZA
Participants received 120 mg (3 tablets of 40 mg) of gilteritinib orally once daily for continuous 28-day cycles in combination with 75 mg/m\^2 of AZA daily via subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion for 7 days of each 28-day treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit from therapy in the opinion of the investigator, unacceptable toxicity occurred or the participant met another treatment discontinuation criterion.After the end of treatment period, participants were followed up for 30- day follow up period. Participants were allowed to enter the long-term follow-up period of up to 3 years for collection of subsequent AML treatment, EQ-5D-5L, remission status and survival (cause of death and date of death). Participants in long-term follow-up who were no longer receiving treatment were followed every 3 months for survival until the implementation of the final protocol version 13.0, at which time they were discontinued from the study, as further survival data were no longer needed.
89
Randomized Cohort: AZA
Participants received 75 mg/m\^2 of AZA daily via subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion for 7 days of each 28-day treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit from therapy in the opinion of the investigator, unacceptable toxicity occurred or the participant met another treatment discontinuation criterion. After the end of treatment period, participants were followed up for 30- day follow up period. Participants were allowed to enter the long-term follow-up period of up to 3 years for collection of subsequent AML treatment, EQ-5D-5L, remission status and survival (cause of death and date of death). Participants in long-term follow-up who were no longer receiving treatment were followed every 3 months for survival until the implementation of the final protocol version 13.0, at which time they were discontinued from the study, as further survival data were no longer needed.
57
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib
Participants received 120 mg (3 tablets of 40 mg) of gilteritinib orally once daily for continuous 28-day cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit from therapy in the opinion of the investigator, unacceptable toxicity occurred or the participant met another treatment discontinuation criterion. However, randomization to this arm was removed in protocol version 7.0. Participants previously randomized to this arm continued following treatment and assessments as outlined in the protocol.
22
Total183

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSafety Cohort: Gilteritinib + Azacitidine (AZA)TotalRandomized Cohort: GilteritinibRandomized Cohort: AZARandomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZA
Age, Continuous75.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
77.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
78.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
76.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
77.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
Age group per Interactive Response Technology (IRT)
< 75 years
6 Participants52 Participants4 Participants15 Participants27 Participants
Age group per Interactive Response Technology (IRT)
>= 75 years
9 Participants131 Participants18 Participants42 Participants62 Participants
Cytogenetic risk status
Favorable
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Cytogenetic risk status
Intermediate
11 Participants131 Participants17 Participants40 Participants63 Participants
Cytogenetic risk status
Others (unknown, missing)
3 Participants34 Participants5 Participants11 Participants15 Participants
Cytogenetic risk status
Unfavorable
1 Participants16 Participants0 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants7 Participants1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants153 Participants18 Participants46 Participants75 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants23 Participants3 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation type
Internal Tandem Duplication (ITD) Alone
10 Participants143 Participants17 Participants46 Participants70 Participants
FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation type
ITD with TKD (D835/I836)
1 Participants9 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation type
Others (unknown/missing/negative)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation type
Tyrosine Kinase Domain (TKD) (D835/I836) Alone
3 Participants30 Participants2 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
3 Participants53 Participants10 Participants15 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
1 Participants22 Participants2 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
11 Participants106 Participants9 Participants33 Participants53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants85 Participants10 Participants27 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants98 Participants12 Participants30 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
14 / 1570 / 8949 / 5722 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 1587 / 8846 / 5422 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 1581 / 8834 / 5420 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. For a participant who was not known to have died by the end of study follow-up, OS was censored at the date of last contact. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates was used for analysis.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause ( maximum duration up to 79 months)

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as the intention to treat set, which consisted of participants who were randomized and were used for efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAOverall Survival (OS)9.82 months
Randomized Cohort: AZAOverall Survival (OS)9.23 months
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibOverall Survival (OS)5.24 months
Comparison: Stratification factors were age group per IRT, risk groups and baseline FLT3 mutation status, with potential of strata pooling.p-value: 0.52395% CI: [0.57, 1.329]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)

The BFI was a tool to assess fatigue severity and impact on daily function in cancer participants over 24 hours. It included 9 items. A global fatigue score was computed by averaging the scores of the 9 items measured on the numeric rating scale. Scores were calculated if ≥5 of 9 items were answered. A higher score indicates a higher degree of fatigue. The first 3 rate fatigue from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (worst imaginable), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The remaining 6 assess how fatigue interferes with daily activities from 0 (no interference) to 10 (completely interferes). A global fatigue score (0-10) was the average of all items, with higher scores indicating worse fatigue. Overall BFI score is reported.

Time frame: From baseline to 31 months

Population: FAS population with available data was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAChange From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)0.77 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
Randomized Cohort: AZAChange From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)0.87 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibChange From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)1.37 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.49
p-value: 0.5695% CI: [-1.1, 2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Completed Remission (CR) Rate

CR rate: number of participants who achieved the best response of CR divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. Participants with unknown or missing response, or who provided no information on response at the end of treatment were included in the denominator when calculating rates. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent(1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (approximately 49.7 months)

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZACompleted Remission (CR) Rate25.8 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZACompleted Remission (CR) Rate17.5 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibCompleted Remission (CR) Rate9.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.24995% CI: [-6.5, 23]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)

CRh was defined as the response at a post baseline visit as CRh having bone marrow myeloblast count \< 5%, partial hematologic recovery ANC ≥ 0.5 x 10\^9/L and platelets ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L, no evidence of extramedullary leukemia and cannot be classified as CR. The blast counts in peripheral blood must be ≤ 2% or missing. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. Percentage of participants with CRh was reported.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (up to 49.7 months)

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAComplete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)10.1 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZAComplete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)1.8 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibComplete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)22.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.04995% CI: [-0.1, 17.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

CRc Rate

CRc rate was defined as participants with best response of (CR + CRp + CRi) divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. Participants were classified as: CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. CRp: achieved CR except incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). CRi: achieved CR except incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 x 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence not required. Percentage of participants with CRc was reported.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (approximately 54.5 months)

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZACRc Rate61.8 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZACRc Rate28.1 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibCRc Rate54.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [16.6, 50]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

CR/CRh Rate

CR/CRh rate: number of participants who achieved CR or CRh divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. CR/CRh: CR/CRh if it fulfilled criteria for CR or CRh at the visit. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. CRh: response at a post baseline visit as CRh having bone marrow myeloblast count \< 5%, partial hematologic recovery ANC ≥ 0.5 x 10\^9/L and platelets ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L, no evidence of extramedullary leukemia and cannot be classified as CR. The blast counts in peripheral blood must be ≤ 2% or missing. Percentage of participants with CR/CRh was reported.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (up to 49.7 months)

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZACR/CRh Rate36.0 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZACR/CRh Rate19.3 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibCR/CRh Rate31.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.03295% CI: [1.1, 32.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Duration of Remission

Duration of remission included CRc, CR, CRh, CR/CRh, and response duration \[CRc + PR\]. Duration of CRc, CR, CRh: the time from the date of first CRc until the date of first documented relapse for participants who achieved CRc, CR, and CRh, respectively. CR/CRh: fulfilled criteria for CR or CRh at the visit. CRh: marrow blasts \<5%, ANC ≥0.5×10\^9/L, platelets ≥50×10\^9/L, not meeting CR criteria. PR: If marrow myeloblasts between \<5% and 25% and ≤2% or missing peripheral blood blast and a decrease from baseline of at least 50% in the marrow myeloblasts and no evidence of extramedullary leukemia, the response was classified as PR. If marrow myeloblasts \<5% and ≤2% or missing peripheral blood blast and no evidence of extramedullary leukemia, the response was classified as PR even with Auer rods.

Time frame: From first day of achieving first response to the first day of confirmed relapse/death (up to 56.4 months)

Population: FAS population with available data was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZADuration of RemissionDuration of CRh6.77 months
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZADuration of RemissionDuration of CRc12.52 months
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZADuration of RemissionDuration of CR/CRh19.94 months
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZADuration of RemissionDuration of CR25.10 months
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZADuration of RemissionDuration of response7.92 months
Randomized Cohort: AZADuration of RemissionDuration of CRc8.25 months
Randomized Cohort: AZADuration of RemissionDuration of CR/CRh8.08 months
Randomized Cohort: AZADuration of RemissionDuration of CR8.25 months
Randomized Cohort: AZADuration of RemissionDuration of CRh8.08 months
Randomized Cohort: AZADuration of RemissionDuration of response7.62 months
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibDuration of RemissionDuration of response3.65 months
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibDuration of RemissionDuration of CRh2.83 months
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibDuration of RemissionDuration of CR/CRh2.83 months
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibDuration of RemissionDuration of CRc3.65 months
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibDuration of RemissionDuration of CRNA months
Comparison: Analysis reported for duration of CR/CRh.p-value: 0.395% CI: [0.198, 1.658]Log Rank
Comparison: Analysis reported for duration of CR.p-value: 0.17195% CI: [0.113, 1.504]Log Rank
Comparison: Analysis reported for duration of CRcp-value: 0.38395% CI: [0.295, 1.62]Log Rank
Comparison: Analysis reported for duration of CRh.p-value: 0.998Log Rank
Comparison: Analysis reported for duration of response.p-value: 0.17495% CI: [0.321, 1.229]Log Rank
Secondary

Event-free Survival (EFS)

EFS: time from the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse from Complete Remission (CR), treatment failure(failing to achieve CR within 6 cycles of treatment) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: bone marrow(BM) regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. Relapse: reappearance of leukemic blasts \>2% in the peripheral blood/≥ 5% myeloblasts in the BM unattributable to any other cause/new/reappearance of extramedullary leukemia.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse from CR, treatment failure or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 39.7 months)

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAEvent-free Survival (EFS)0.03 months
Randomized Cohort: AZAEvent-free Survival (EFS)0.03 months
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibEvent-free Survival (EFS)0.03 months
Comparison: Stratification factors were age group per IRT, risk groups and baseline FLT3 mutation status, with potential of strata pooling.p-value: 0.78795% CI: [0.635, 1.393]Log Rank
Secondary

Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)

LFS: time from the date of first CRc (CR + CRp + CRi) until the date of documented relapse (excluding relapse from PR) or death for participants who achieved CRc. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. CRp: achieved CR except incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). CRi: achieved CR except incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 x 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence not required. CRc: fulfilled criteria for CR, CRp or CRi. Based on KM estimates.

Time frame: From first day of achieving first CRc to the first day of confirmed relapse/death (up to 54.5 months)

Population: FAS population included participants who had achieved CRc.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZALeukemia-free Survival (LFS)7.16 months
Randomized Cohort: AZALeukemia-free Survival (LFS)8.08 months
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibLeukemia-free Survival (LFS)3.20 months
p-value: 0.59295% CI: [0.451, 1.58]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Scores

ECOG performance scores at each assessment time were be provided by treatment group. Negative change scores indicated an improvement and positive scores indicate a decline in performance. The grades were defined as follows: 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. Dead.

Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment (up to 57 months)

Population: SAF population with available data was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEnd of Treatment (EOT): Grade 01 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 50 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 40 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 01 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 24 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 31 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 36 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 14 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 22 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 50 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 11 participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 41 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 212 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 310 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 50 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 112 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 015 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 134 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 228 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 41 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEnd of Treatment (EOT): Grade 04 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 37 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 46 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 50 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 40 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 211 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 50 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 115 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 126 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEnd of Treatment (EOT): Grade 08 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 214 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 31 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 09 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 50 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 35 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 41 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 23 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 41 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 16 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 50 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 50 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 41 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 31 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 29 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEnd of Treatment (EOT): Grade 02 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresEOT: Grade 14 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 33 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance ScoresBaseline: Grade 03 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable & unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. TEAE was defined as an adverse event observed after starting administration of the study drug until 30 days from the last study treatment

Time frame: From first dose up to end of study duration (101 months)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug (ASP2215 or azacitidine).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZANumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)15 participants
Randomized Cohort: AZANumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)88 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)52 participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)22 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Response

Best response for a participant was defined as the best measured response (in the order of CR, CR with Incomplete Platelet Recovery (CRp), CR with Incomplete Hematologic Recovery (CRi), and treatment failure) from all post-baseline visits. CR: BM regenerating normal hematopoietic cells, morphologically leukemia-free state, ANC ≥1 × 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L, normal marrow differential with \<5% myeloblast counts, missing/≤2% peripheral blood blast counts and being RBC and platelet transfusion independent (1 week without RBC and platelet transfusion prior to the disease assessment). No evidence of extramedullary leukemia and Auer rods. CRp: achieved CR except incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). CRi: achieved CR except incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 x 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence not required.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (up to 57 months)

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCRp6.7 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCR25.8 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCRi29.2 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZAPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCRp0 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZAPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCR17.5 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZAPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCRi10.5 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCR9.1 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCRi27.3 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibPercentage of Participants With Best ResponseCRp18.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Conversion Rate

Transfusion conversion rate was defined as the number of participants who were transfusion dependent at baseline period but became transfusion independent at post-baseline period divided by the total number of participants who were transfusion dependent at baseline period.

Time frame: From baseline up to 57 months

Population: FAS population included participants who were transfusion dependent at baseline period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Conversion Rate35.6 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZAPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Conversion Rate44.7 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Conversion Rate61.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.3495% CI: [-29.8, 11]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Maintenance Rate

Transfusion maintenance rate was defined as the number of participants who were transfusion independent at baseline period and remained transfusion independent post-baseline period divided by the total number of participants who were transfusion independent at baseline period.

Time frame: From baseline up to 57 months

Population: FAS population included participants who were transfusion independent at baseline period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Randomized Cohort: Gilteritinib + AZAPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Maintenance Rate100.0 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: AZAPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Maintenance Rate50.0 percentage of participants
Randomized Cohort: GilteritinibPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Maintenance Rate50.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.22195% CI: [-61, 100]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 15, 2026