Skip to content

Impact of 18F-FDG PET-CT Versus Conventional Staging in the Management of Patients Presenting With Clinical Stage III Breast Cancer

Impact of 18F-FDG PET-CT Versus Conventional Staging in the Management of Patients Presenting With Clinical Stage III Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02751710
Acronym
PET ABC
Enrollment
369
Registered
2016-04-26
Start date
2016-12-06
Completion date
2023-03-31
Last updated
2024-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stage IIb Breast Cancer (T3N0), Stage III Breast Cancer (T0N2, T1N2, T2N2, T3N1, 2 or T4)

Brief summary

This trial is being conducted to determine the impact of whole body FDG PET-CT vs. conventional staging in the management of patients presenting with clinical Stage III breast cancer. Eligible consenting patients with ductal or mixed histology breast cancer will be randomized 1:1 to whole body FDG PET-CT or conventional staging. Eligible consenting patients with lobular only histology will be entered into a separate single arm prospective study and will undergo whole body FDG PET-CT, CT with contrast of the chest/abdomen & pelvis and a bone scan.

Interventions

OTHERWhole-body FDG PET-CT alone

FDG PET-CT imaging

Sponsors

Cancer Care Ontario
CollaboratorOTHER
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women (or men) with histological evidence of breast cancer for whom potentially curative treatment is planned. * Based on clinical information (physical exam, imaging): 1. Stage III breast cancer (T0N2, T1N2, T2N2, T3N1, 2 or T4), or 2. Stage IIb breast cancer (T3N0), Note: T2N1 is not eligible * Considered for combined modality therapy (surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) of curative intent.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years, * ECOG performance status \> and = 3, * Prior systemic therapy (e.g. neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) for current breast cancer, * Previous staging investigations for current breast cancer, * Breast cancer with primary histological subtypes other than ductal or lobular (Note: Patients with mixed disease will be eligible for randomization), * Clinical suspicion of metastatic disease, * Relative contraindications to PET (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes (i.e. inability to decrease serum glucose below 10.2 mmol/L), claustrophobia, inability to be still for 30 minutes), * Inability to lie supine for imaging with PET-CT, * Inability to undergo CT because of known allergy to contrast, * History of another invasive malignancy within the previous two years (exception of non melanoma skin cancer) or a synchronous primary cancer, including a synchronous contralateral breast cancer (Note: Patients found to have a contralateral breast cancer on study imaging following randomization will remain in the study), * Known pregnancy or lactating female, * Inability to complete the study or required follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients upstaged to Stage IV diseaseWithin 30 days from date of randomizationProportion of patients upstaged to Stage IV disease as a result of the imaging study, between the groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of additional tests, such as imaging and biopsy, resulting from findings of study imagingWithin 12 months from date of randomization
Prognostic ability of PET SUV of the primary lesion on the pathological response rate to neo-adjuvant chemotherapyWithin 12 months from date of randomization
Proportion of patients who receive multimodal therapy of curative intentWithin 12 months from date of randomization
Overall SurvivalFrom date of randomization to date of event, assessed up to 5 yearsDefined by all-cause mortality
Incremental economic analysis comparing the costs and outcomes of the treatment armsWithin 5 years from date of randomizationUtility values will be collected using the EQ-5D Health Utility Questionnaire and converted to quality adjusted life years (QALYs) by considering Overall Survival. Direct medical resources (i.e. tests, complications, hospitalizations, clinic visits, emergency dept., etc.) will be obtained. Costs ($CAN2016) for each resource identified and utilized will be determined. Finally, an incremental cost-utility analysis will be calculated comparing the 2 randomized arms to generate an incremental cost per QALY outcome.
Disease Free SurvivalFrom date of randomization to date of event, assessed up to 5 yearsObjectively defined local or distance recurrence or death

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026