Gastric Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
minimally invasive surgery, gastrectomy, robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopy, robot-assisted, robotic, robotic gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy, minimally invasive gastrectomy
Brief summary
The overall purpose is to develop and maintain a multi-institutional database comprising of information regarding surgical, clinical and oncological features of patients that will be treated for gastric cancer with robotic, laparoscopic or open approaches and subsequent follow-up. The main objective is to compare the three surgical arms on surgical and clinical outcomes, as well as on the oncological follow-up.
Detailed description
A review of the scientific literature, which was recently published by the IMIGASTRIC study group, aimed to perform a more complete analysis of the current situation regarding performing minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer. Significant limitations were found in the analyzed studies, including: * Small samples of patients, mostly low-quality comparative studies * Selection bias in the comparison groups (e.g. stage, extent of lymphadenectomy) * Absence of subgroup analysis in significant research fields * Lack of information on the surgical techniques adopted A large prospective multicenter registry could thus be the optimal way to clarify the role of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer and permit the evaluation of its short and long-term effects. A working basis for analyzing outcomes of interest and obtaining directions for guidelines and future study developments can also be created. The following would be the main advantages of a large prospective multicenter registry: * Achieving a large sample of patients * Collecting multiple variables, allowing for the making of a comprehensive statistical report * Standardizing the methodology to be adopted, thus increasing accuracy * Bringing together the experiences of both East and West to discover shared points A prospective registry can become a powerful tool that can guide research in this field to new developments and pave the way for other investigational opportunities.
Interventions
PROCEDURERobotic Gastrectomy
Minimally invasive surgical approach, related to the availability of a robotic surgical system (eg Da Vinci surgical system), that allows a surgeon to perform surgery through a console and dedicated devices.
PROCEDURELaparoscopic Gastrectomy
Minimally invasive surgical approach performed through traditional laparoscopy.
Sponsors
International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically proven gastric cancer * Preoperative staging work-up performed by upper endoscopy and/or endoscopic ultrasound, and CT scan and in accordance to international guidelines * Early Gastric Cancer * Advanced Gastric Cancer * Patients treated with curative intent in accordance to international guidelines
Exclusion criteria
* Distant metastases: peritoneal carcinomatosis, liver metastases, distant lymph node metastases, Krukenberg tumors, involvement of other organs * Patients with high operative risk as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score \> 4 * History of previous abdominal surgery for gastric cancer * Synchronous malignancy in other organs * Palliative surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of patients with intraoperative adverse events | During surgery | events other than the normal course of the surgery |
| Mean of retrieved lymph nodes | Within 30 days after surgery | Count of retrieved lymph nodes at the histopathological examination of the surgical specimen |
| Rate of patients alive | 1 year after surgery | subjects alive at the planned endpoint |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean post-operative hospital stay | from the day after surgery to patient discharge, assessed up to 90 days | hospital stay of the patients after surgery |
| Rate of complications after discharge | 5 year after surgery | any surgical related event after patient's discharge |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactJacopo Desiderio, MD
Outcome results
None listed