Skip to content

Post-marketing Observational Study to Evaluate the Incremental Impact of AbbVie's Patient Support Program on Patient Reported Outcomes and Health Resource Utilization in Inflammatory Arthritis, Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Hungary (VALUE)

Post-marketing Observational Study to Evaluate the Effect of HUMIRA (Adalimumab) Treatment With AbbVie's Patient Support Program on Patient Reported Outcomes and Health Resource Utilization in Inflammatory Arthritis, Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Hungary in a Real-life Setting: VALUE

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02750800
Acronym
VALUE
Enrollment
427
Registered
2016-04-26
Start date
2016-04-07
Completion date
2018-04-03
Last updated
2019-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis, Crohn's Disease, Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis, Psoriatic arthritis, Psoriasis, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis, Patient support program, Quality of life, Patient related outcomes, Observational study, Adalimumab, Humira, Adherence, Health-related quality of life, Healthcare resource utilization, Disease activity, Treatment satisfaction, Workability

Brief summary

The objective of this post-marketing observational study (PMOS) was to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab plus the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the routine clinical setting in Hungary.

Detailed description

This was a prospective, open label, multicenter, observational cohort study. Adalimumab was prescribed in the usual manner in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization and professional and reimbursement guidelines with regards to dose, population and indication. AbbVie offered an array of services as part of a patient support program, called AbbVie Care 2.0, to study participants. The purpose of the AbbVie Care 2.0 program was to provide educational resources that aimed to help participants understand their health condition and disease management (e.g., lifestyle - exercise or diet), but also help to them understand how to administer the product safely and be empowered to stay on track with their prescribed treatment plan, all with the goal of maximizing patient outcomes. There were five target visits: a baseline visit at enrollment and follow-up visits at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAdalimumab

Pre-filled syringe or pen, administered by subcutaneous injection

BEHAVIORALAbbVie Care 2.0

Supportive services provided to participants included reminder calls, emails, text messages, nursing services, dietician, and psychological support. An adalimumab starter pack, injection guide, digital and print educational materials were also provided.

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) by the treating physician * Age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment * RA, AS, PsA, Ps, UC or CD patients for whom adalimumab treatment was indicated as per local Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and professional/reimbursement guidelines * Participants assigned to adalimumab treatment not more than 1 month prior to inclusion * Participants to whom participation in AbbVie Care 2.0 Patient Support Program (PSP) program was offered and participant decided to join and had started the PSP * Participants willing to be involved in the study and to sign patient informed consent form (ICF) and subject information form (SIF) in order to allow use and disclosure of his/her personal health information

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who could not be treated with adalimumab according to the local adalimumab SmPC and local professional and reimbursement guidelines * Participants treated with \> 1 prior biologic disease modifying anti rheumatic drug (DMARD) for RA, AS, PsA, Ps, UC or CD * Prior treatment with adalimumab for more than 1 month * Participants currently participating in other clinical research studies * Participants who were unwilling or unable to complete the quality of life and other patient-reported questionnaires

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 worst-100 best). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Responses to the five dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score. The range for the EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 with '0' defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health. The higher the score the better the health status. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Participants rated their health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints were labelled 100, The best health you can imagineand 0, The worst health you can imagine. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative ColitisBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe SIBDQ is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire, able to detect and define meaningful clinical changes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) participants by measuring physical, social and emotional status. The SIBDQ consists of 10 questions; each question is scored on a scale from 1 (poor QOL) to 7 (optimum QOL). A higher score indicates a better health-related quality of life. Total scores range from 10 (poor QoL) to 70 (good QoL). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Psoriasis and Psoriatic ArthritisBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a self-reported questionnaire for capturing psychosocial effects of chronic skin disease on different areas of life within the previous seven days. The ten questions cover six areas: symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationship, effects of treatment on daily life. Total DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with 0 corresponding to the best quality of life and 30 to the worst. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis With Axial SymptomsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with AS. Participants answer yes/no to 18 items assessing the current impact of AS on their quality of life status. The total score ranges from 0 to 18, with lower scores representing better AS-specific quality of life. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version 1.4 is an instrument to show that adherence is expected to be related with participants' satisfaction with therapy and that such satisfaction can be a function of not only the effect of the treatment, but also the services offered. TSQM responses are used to derive scores for scales measuring effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction (based on participant evaluation over the last 2 to 3 weeks, or since last medication use). Scores for each of the 4 scales range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better state or outcome (e.g., greater perceived effectiveness or satisfaction). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS) assesses whether an individual has received enough information about a range of topics relating to prescribed medication. Participants are asked to rate the amount of information they have received using the following response scale: too much, about right, too little, none received, none needed. Total satisfaction rating is obtained by summing the scores for each item. If the participant is satisfied that he/she has received a particular aspect of medication information (with a rating of about right or none needed), this is given a score of 1. If the participant is dissatisfied with the amount of information received (with a rating of too much, too little, or none received), this is scored 0. Total scores range from 0 to 17 with high scores indicating a high degree of overall satisfaction with the amount of medication information received. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 (MMAS-4 ) is a 4-item self-reported measure of medication-taking behavior. It measures intentional and non-intentional non-adherence. The MMAS-4 score is the sum of four questions and ranges from 0 to 4: The coding is 0, 1 (low adherence), 2, 3 (moderate adherence) and 4 (high adherence). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe WPAI-SHP is a questionnaire used to assess the effect of the participant's health problems on their ability to work and perform regular activities. Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems. Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems. Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems. Total work productivity impairment (TWPI) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave Days12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)The number of hospital inpatient days over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total post-treatment hospital inpatient days was obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The number of sick leave days (in employed participants) over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total post-treatment sick leave days was obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 worst-100 best). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)The number of outpatient visits to general practitioners, immune-mediated inflammatory disease specialists, ophthalmologists, gastroenterologists, dermatologists, rheumatologists, physiatrists, physiotherapists, and nurses over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total outpatient visits were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's assessment of global disease activity (on a visual analog scale \[VAS\] from 0 to 10 cm) are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score \>5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score \<3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score \<2.6 indicates clinical remission. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ESR) at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) tool is a self-administered questionnaire/objective laboratory evaluation. The questionnaire assesses disease activity, back pain, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe)) and duration of morning stiffness on a numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of ≥2 hours). The laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR). Data from five variables (disease activity, back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling, and ESR) are combined to yield a score (0 to no defined upper limit). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a research tool used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's disease. Participants were asked to record the frequency of stools, abdominal pain and general well-being on a daily basis. In addition to the diary data, the investigator assessed the following for the calculation of CDAI: presence of complications (arthritis/arthralgia, iritis/uveitis, erythema nodosum/pyoderma gangrenosum/aphthous stomatitis, anal fissure/fistula/abscess, other fistula, and fever), the use of antidiarrheal medicines, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. The CDAI is the sum of the products of each item multiplied by a weighting factor and generally ranges from 0 up to 600, where remission of Crohn's disease is defined as CDAI \< 150, and severe disease is defined as CDAI \> 450. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo (pMayo) Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at 12 MonthsBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsThe Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs. The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72. The higher the total score, the more severe the disease. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Participants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 Months12 monthsAll participants enrolled in the study were enrolled in the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support (PSP) program. Participants rated the PSP program as either Very good, good, less satisfying or I do not use the services at the last study visit.
Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life ScoresBaseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsTo define possible correlations between disease activity scores and disease specific quality of life scores, correlation analyses were performed. Correlation between patient socio-demographics, patient type and indication was not completed because these were uninterpretable per protocol. ASQoL= Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire ASDAS(ESR) = Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR) DAS28(ESR)= Disease Activity Score 28; laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR) SIBDQ= Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire CDAI= Clinical Disease Activity Index DLQI= Dermatology Life Quality Index PASI= Psoriasis Area and Severity Index pMayo= Partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy)
Correlation Between the Length of AbbVie Care 2.0 Duration and Participant OutcomesFrom Baseline (Month 0) to 12 monthsThe effectiveness of the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient care support program (PSP) on participant outcomes was to be analyzed by applying mixed linear models on outcomes including PSP utilization (continuous vs terminated) as fixed variables. Baseline participant outcome values were also to be included in the model.
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick Leaves12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)The number of hospitalizations over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total hospitalizations were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The number of sick leaves (in employed participants) over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total sick leaves were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Full Analysis Set: participants who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and received at least one dose of adalimumab

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
76
Crohn's Disease
Participants with Crohn's disease
62
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
69
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
75
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
67
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
63
Total412

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event18
Overall StudyInvestigator decision53
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyOther, not specified3
Overall StudyPatient request12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnkylosing SpondylitisCrohn's DiseasePsoriasisPsoriatic ArthritisRheumatoid ArthritisUlcerative ColitisTotal
Age, Continuous47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.33
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
51.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.24
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44
37.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.52
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants31 Participants22 Participants34 Participants53 Participants27 Participants196 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants31 Participants47 Participants41 Participants14 Participants35 Participants215 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 412
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 412

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months

The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 worst-100 best). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months11.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.24
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months7.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.51
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months4.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months12.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.73
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months11.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.83
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months9.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.65
Secondary

Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life Scores

To define possible correlations between disease activity scores and disease specific quality of life scores, correlation analyses were performed. Correlation between patient socio-demographics, patient type and indication was not completed because these were uninterpretable per protocol. ASQoL= Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire ASDAS(ESR) = Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR) DAS28(ESR)= Disease Activity Score 28; laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR) SIBDQ= Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire CDAI= Clinical Disease Activity Index DLQI= Dermatology Life Quality Index PASI= Psoriasis Area and Severity Index pMayo= Partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy)

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ankylosing SpondylitisCorrelation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life ScoresASQoL - ASDAS(ESR)-0.213 correlation coefficient
Crohn's DiseaseCorrelation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life ScoresSIBDQ - CDAI-0.138 correlation coefficient
PsoriasisCorrelation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life ScoresDLQI - PASI0.323 correlation coefficient
Psoriatic ArthritisCorrelation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life ScoresASQoL - DAS28(ESR)0.132 correlation coefficient
Rheumatoid ArthritisCorrelation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life ScoresSIBDQ - pMayo-0.453 correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation Between the Length of AbbVie Care 2.0 Duration and Participant Outcomes

The effectiveness of the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient care support program (PSP) on participant outcomes was to be analyzed by applying mixed linear models on outcomes including PSP utilization (continuous vs terminated) as fixed variables. Baseline participant outcome values were also to be included in the model.

Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to 12 months

Population: Assessment of the effectiveness of the length of PSP exposure on participant outcomes was not possible because of the low number of participants in the non-PSP group.

Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ESR) at 12 Months

The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) tool is a self-administered questionnaire/objective laboratory evaluation. The questionnaire assesses disease activity, back pain, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe)) and duration of morning stiffness on a numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of ≥2 hours). The laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR). Data from five variables (disease activity, back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling, and ESR) are combined to yield a score (0 to no defined upper limit). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis with axial symptoms and evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ESR) at 12 Months-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ESR) at 12 Months-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis With Axial Symptoms

The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with AS. Participants answer yes/no to 18 items assessing the current impact of AS on their quality of life status. The total score ranges from 0 to 18, with lower scores representing better AS-specific quality of life. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either ankylosing spondylitis and or psoriatic arthritis with axial symptoms and evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis With Axial Symptoms-6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis With Axial Symptoms-6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 12 Months

The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a research tool used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's disease. Participants were asked to record the frequency of stools, abdominal pain and general well-being on a daily basis. In addition to the diary data, the investigator assessed the following for the calculation of CDAI: presence of complications (arthritis/arthralgia, iritis/uveitis, erythema nodosum/pyoderma gangrenosum/aphthous stomatitis, anal fissure/fistula/abscess, other fistula, and fever), the use of antidiarrheal medicines, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. The CDAI is the sum of the products of each item multiplied by a weighting factor and generally ranges from 0 up to 600, where remission of Crohn's disease is defined as CDAI \< 150, and severe disease is defined as CDAI \> 450. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with Crohn's disease and evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 12 Months-174.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 95.3
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a self-reported questionnaire for capturing psychosocial effects of chronic skin disease on different areas of life within the previous seven days. The ten questions cover six areas: symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationship, effects of treatment on daily life. Total DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with 0 corresponding to the best quality of life and 30 to the worst. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis and evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis-8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.93
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at 12 Months

The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's assessment of global disease activity (on a visual analog scale \[VAS\] from 0 to 10 cm) are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score \>5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score \<3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score \<2.6 indicates clinical remission. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either psoriatic arthritis with peripheral symptoms or rheumatoid arthritis and evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at 12 Months-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at 12 Months-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months

The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Responses to the five dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score. The range for the EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 with '0' defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health. The higher the score the better the health status. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months0.185 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months0.169 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months0.084 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months0.203 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months0.152 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months0.123 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months

The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Participants rated their health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints were labelled 100, The best health you can imagineand 0, The worst health you can imagine. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.23
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months22.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.65
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months11.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months29.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.52
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months22.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.82
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months25.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.11
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 Months

The WPAI-SHP is a questionnaire used to assess the effect of the participant's health problems on their ability to work and perform regular activities. Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems. Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems. Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems. Total work productivity impairment (TWPI) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data; participants who were employed with available data at baseline and 12 months are included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsAbsenteeism-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.4
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal work productivity impairment-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsPresenteeism-30.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal activity impairment-30.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal work productivity impairment-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsAbsenteeism-16.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.8
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal activity impairment-14.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.7
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsPresenteeism-20.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.7
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsAbsenteeism-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsPresenteeism-19.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal work productivity impairment-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal activity impairment-18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsPresenteeism-35.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.5
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal work productivity impairment-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal activity impairment-34.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.9
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsAbsenteeism-9.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal activity impairment-33.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.7
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsPresenteeism-33.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.2
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsAbsenteeism-8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.8
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal work productivity impairment-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal work productivity impairment-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.1
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsPresenteeism-13.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.4
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsAbsenteeism-10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.7
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 MonthsTotal activity impairment-24.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo (pMayo) Score at 12 Months

The Partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with ulcerative colitis and evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo (pMayo) Score at 12 Months-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at 12 Months

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs. The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72. The higher the total score, the more severe the disease. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with psoriasis and evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at 12 Months-16.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months

The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 worst-100 best). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months9.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.31
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months10.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.87
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months6.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.25
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months8.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.63
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months5.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.86
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months11.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.35
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The SIBDQ is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire, able to detect and define meaningful clinical changes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) participants by measuring physical, social and emotional status. The SIBDQ consists of 10 questions; each question is scored on a scale from 1 (poor QOL) to 7 (optimum QOL). A higher score indicates a better health-related quality of life. Total scores range from 10 (poor QoL) to 70 (good QoL). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis and evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis11.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis16.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months

The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 (MMAS-4 ) is a 4-item self-reported measure of medication-taking behavior. It measures intentional and non-intentional non-adherence. The MMAS-4 score is the sum of four questions and ranges from 0 to 4: The coding is 0, 1 (low adherence), 2, 3 (moderate adherence) and 4 (high adherence). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months0.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months0.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months0.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months

The Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS) assesses whether an individual has received enough information about a range of topics relating to prescribed medication. Participants are asked to rate the amount of information they have received using the following response scale: too much, about right, too little, none received, none needed. Total satisfaction rating is obtained by summing the scores for each item. If the participant is satisfied that he/she has received a particular aspect of medication information (with a rating of about right or none needed), this is given a score of 1. If the participant is dissatisfied with the amount of information received (with a rating of too much, too little, or none received), this is scored 0. Total scores range from 0 to 17 with high scores indicating a high degree of overall satisfaction with the amount of medication information received. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 Months

The 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version 1.4 is an instrument to show that adherence is expected to be related with participants' satisfaction with therapy and that such satisfaction can be a function of not only the effect of the treatment, but also the services offered. TSQM responses are used to derive scores for scales measuring effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction (based on participant evaluation over the last 2 to 3 weeks, or since last medication use). Scores for each of the 4 scales range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better state or outcome (e.g., greater perceived effectiveness or satisfaction). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsEffectiveness7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.8
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsSide effects2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsConvenience10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsGlobal satisfaction7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsConvenience10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsSide effects9.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsEffectiveness7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 39
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsGlobal satisfaction7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsGlobal satisfaction1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsConvenience9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsSide effects-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
PsoriasisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsEffectiveness4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.3
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsEffectiveness6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsGlobal satisfaction9.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsSide effects5.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsConvenience8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsConvenience7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsGlobal satisfaction5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsSide effects11.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsEffectiveness3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.1
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsSide effects11.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsConvenience14.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsGlobal satisfaction11.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 MonthsEffectiveness15.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.2
Secondary

Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave Days

The number of hospital inpatient days over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total post-treatment hospital inpatient days was obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The number of sick leave days (in employed participants) over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total post-treatment sick leave days was obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.

Time frame: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data; participants who were employed with available data at baseline and 12 months are included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of sick leave days-5.10 daysStandard Deviation 15.37
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of hospital inpatient days-2.56 daysStandard Deviation 11.93
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of sick leave days-0.91 daysStandard Deviation 32.37
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of hospital inpatient days-5.00 daysStandard Deviation 17.36
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of hospital inpatient days-1.25 daysStandard Deviation 6
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of sick leave days-1.55 daysStandard Deviation 7.14
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of hospital inpatient days-3.75 daysStandard Deviation 18.41
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of sick leave days-1.16 daysStandard Deviation 8
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of sick leave days-22.00 daysStandard Deviation 82.81
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of hospital inpatient days-3.68 daysStandard Deviation 15.32
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of hospital inpatient days-2.91 daysStandard Deviation 9.1
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave DaysNumber of sick leave days-6.68 daysStandard Deviation 37.29
Secondary

Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick Leaves

The number of hospitalizations over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total hospitalizations were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The number of sick leaves (in employed participants) over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total sick leaves were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.

Time frame: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data; participants who were employed with available data at baseline and 12 months are included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of hospitalizations-0.28 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.15
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of sick leaves-0.58 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.66
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of sick leaves-1.19 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.3
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of hospitalizations-1.06 occurrencesStandard Deviation 2.97
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of hospitalizations-0.18 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.83
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of sick leaves-0.20 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.88
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of hospitalizations-0.15 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.98
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of sick leaves0.05 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.68
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of hospitalizations-0.35 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.33
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of sick leaves-1.81 occurrencesStandard Deviation 9.73
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of sick leaves-0.54 occurrencesStandard Deviation 2.05
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick LeavesNumber of hospitalizations-0.45 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.34
Secondary

Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits

The number of outpatient visits to general practitioners, immune-mediated inflammatory disease specialists, ophthalmologists, gastroenterologists, dermatologists, rheumatologists, physiatrists, physiotherapists, and nurses over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total outpatient visits were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.

Time frame: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data. Data were not collected for visits to physiatrists and physiotherapists in the Psoriasis Arm/Group, and for visits to physiatrists in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Arm/Group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiatrist-0.04 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.47
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGeneral practitioner-4.32 occurrencesStandard Deviation 6.78
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGastroenterologist-0.40 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.41
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiotherapist-0.33 occurrencesStandard Deviation 6.43
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsNurse-0.98 occurrencesStandard Deviation 3.3
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsImmune-mediated inflammatory disease specialist-2.02 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.45
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsDermatologist0.13 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.54
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsRheumatologist-6.18 occurrencesStandard Deviation 6.06
Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsOphthalmologist-0.35 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.59
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGastroenterologist-6.83 occurrencesStandard Deviation 7.33
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsOphthalmologist0.18 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.59
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsNurse-1.75 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.73
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsRheumatologist-0.35 occurrencesStandard Deviation 2.37
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiatrist0.06 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.24
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsImmune-mediated inflammatory disease specialist-5.97 occurrencesStandard Deviation 6.99
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiotherapist1.18 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.85
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGeneral practitioner-4.35 occurrencesStandard Deviation 6.32
Crohn's DiseaseMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsDermatologist-0.06 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.95
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsOphthalmologist-0.44 occurrencesStandard Deviation 2.09
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsImmune-mediated inflammatory disease specialist-2.93 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.76
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsNurse-0.11 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.68
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsRheumatologist-1.16 occurrencesStandard Deviation 2.74
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGastroenterologist-0.33 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.12
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsDermatologist-5.71 occurrencesStandard Deviation 5.41
PsoriasisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGeneral practitioner-2.97 occurrencesStandard Deviation 5.18
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsImmune-mediated inflammatory disease specialist-1.60 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.41
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsNurse-0.96 occurrencesStandard Deviation 2.63
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsRheumatologist-5.36 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.9
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiotherapist-0.75 occurrencesStandard Deviation 5.2
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsDermatologist-0.93 occurrencesStandard Deviation 2.08
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGeneral practitioner-3.41 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.47
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsOphthalmologist0.02 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.15
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiatrist-0.09 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.61
Psoriatic ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGastroenterologist-0.14 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.91
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiotherapist-1.49 occurrencesStandard Deviation 9.62
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsNurse-1.09 occurrencesStandard Deviation 3.64
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGeneral practitioner-5.06 occurrencesStandard Deviation 8.29
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsImmune-mediated inflammatory disease specialist-2.76 occurrencesStandard Deviation 5.9
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsOphthalmologist-0.15 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.12
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGastroenterologist-0.13 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.02
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsDermatologist-0.02 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.04
Rheumatoid ArthritisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsRheumatologist-7.96 occurrencesStandard Deviation 5.71
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiatrist0.16 occurrencesStandard Deviation 0.85
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsRheumatologist0.15 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.98
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsDermatologist-0.26 occurrencesStandard Deviation 2.26
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsPhysiotherapist0.00 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.19
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGastroenterologist-5.45 occurrencesStandard Deviation 8.27
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsOphthalmologist-0.15 occurrencesStandard Deviation 1.32
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsImmune-mediated inflammatory disease specialist-3.53 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.83
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsGeneral practitioner-3.68 occurrencesStandard Deviation 5.56
Ulcerative ColitisMean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient VisitsNurse0.00 occurrencesStandard Deviation 4.35
Secondary

Participants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 Months

All participants enrolled in the study were enrolled in the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support (PSP) program. Participants rated the PSP program as either Very good, good, less satisfying or I do not use the services at the last study visit.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ankylosing SpondylitisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsGood20 Participants
Ankylosing SpondylitisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsVery good39 Participants
Ankylosing SpondylitisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsLess Satisfying3 Participants
Ankylosing SpondylitisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsI do not use the services0 Participants
Crohn's DiseaseParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsLess Satisfying2 Participants
Crohn's DiseaseParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsVery good20 Participants
Crohn's DiseaseParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsGood28 Participants
Crohn's DiseaseParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsI do not use the services0 Participants
PsoriasisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsGood23 Participants
PsoriasisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsVery good28 Participants
PsoriasisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsLess Satisfying1 Participants
PsoriasisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsI do not use the services2 Participants
Psoriatic ArthritisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsI do not use the services0 Participants
Psoriatic ArthritisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsGood22 Participants
Psoriatic ArthritisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsLess Satisfying1 Participants
Psoriatic ArthritisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsVery good33 Participants
Rheumatoid ArthritisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsVery good31 Participants
Rheumatoid ArthritisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsGood19 Participants
Rheumatoid ArthritisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsI do not use the services0 Participants
Rheumatoid ArthritisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsLess Satisfying0 Participants
Ulcerative ColitisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsVery good28 Participants
Ulcerative ColitisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsLess Satisfying0 Participants
Ulcerative ColitisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsI do not use the services1 Participants
Ulcerative ColitisParticipants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 MonthsGood16 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026