Skip to content

Maintenance of ANCA Vasculitis Remission by Intermittent Rituximab Dosing

Maintenance of ANCA Vasculitis Remission by Intermittent Rituximab Dosing Based on B-cell Reconstitution vs a Serologic ANCA Flare

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02749292
Acronym
MAINTANCAVAS
Enrollment
115
Registered
2016-04-22
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2023-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

Keywords

rituximab, maintenance, remission

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the best management strategy to maintain remission in patients with ANCA vasculitis who have been treated with rituximab induced B cell depletion for at least two years. This study will compare intermittent B Cell depletion upon B cell return or intermittent B cell depletion upon serologic relapse.

Detailed description

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA) vasculitis is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by small vessel inflammation caused by pathogenic autoantibodies directed against proteinase 3 (PR3) or myeloperoxidase (MPO). Immunosuppressive therapy can result in remission; however, many patients relapse, which results in additional injury. Rituximab, a humanized murine monoclonal antibody directed against CD20 located on the surface of B-lymphocytes (B cells), is effective in depleting B cells. The RAVE and RITUXVAS trials have shown efficacy of rituximab with steroids for induction of remission in ANCA vasculitis, similar to cyclophosphamide and steroids. Rituximab is now FDA-approved for induction of remission therapy in ANCA vasculitis. The utility of anti-B-cell therapy for early induction of remission in ANCA vasculitis is not surprising given that ANCA are pathogenic in vitro and in vivo. It is clear that remission in many patients is not sustained with a single induction course of rituximab, and relapses often occur after B cell re-population suggesting that scheduled, serial dosing of rituximab could result in sustained remissions. Despite yielding promising outcomes, rituximab is also associated with a number of adverse events including infectious complications and late onset of neutropenia5, 15. Furthermore, the complications of continuous B cell depletion for extended durations are unknown. One of the major goals in the field is to utilize prolonged B cell depletion only in the subpopulation of patients where the risk of disease relapse outweighs the risk of treatment-related adverse events. A rise in ANCA titers and reconstitution of B cells are promising biomarkers of impending disease relapse following treatment with rituximab4-6 A prospective and longitudinal clinical trial is needed to determine the ideal treatment strategy for long-term maintenance of remission. We propose to compare intermittent rituximab dosing based on B cell return and a serologic ANCA flare The study design is an open-label, single center, randomized and two-arm controlled trial to evaluate the optimal maintenance of remission strategy that provides the best relapse-free survival in patients with ANCA vasculitis as determined by relapse-free remission at 18, 24 and 36 months from enrollment. The investigators are looking to enroll and randomize 200 subjects with ANCA vasculitis on rituximab-induced continuous B cell depletion for a minimum of two years to one of two arms as follows: 1. Intermittent B cell depletion with rituximab re-dosing upon B cell return: Subjects will not receive their regularly-scheduled every-six-month dose of rituximab and will instead receive rituximab 1000 mg IV x 1 dose (spaced 2-3 weeks apart) once peripheral B cells return ( ≥ 10 B cells/mm3). This cycle will then re-start. Subjects will be seen in clinic every three months. Patients will continue to be dosed with rituximab each time the B cell count rises to 10 cells/mm3. In the unique scenario that the B cells are detectable, but less than the threshold of 10 cells/mm3, subjects will be asked to return in 6 weeks for repeat B cell testing. 2. Hold continuous dosing with rituximab with re-dosing upon a significant ANCA titer increase: For MPO, a significant increase will be defined as a 5-fold rise in ANCA titer and a level greater than 4 times the cutoff value for the assay. For PR3, a significant rise will be defined as a 4-fold rise in ANCA titer to a level at least twofold above the cutoff for the assay. Subjects will not receive regularly scheduled every six-month doses of rituximab and will instead be seen in clinic to have their ANCA titer monitored every three months. Subjects who sustain a significant increase in ANCA titer will receive rituximab 1000mg IV x 2 doses, \ 2-3 weeks apart. If the ANCA titer remains two-fold above baseline and above a specified threshold (the cutoff value of the assay for PR3 and 4 times the cutoff value for MPO) , subjects will continue to receive rituximab 1000mg IV every 6 months for a maximum of 2 doses, at which time a new baseline ANCA titer will be established and the cycle will re-start.

Interventions

DRUGRituximab

re-dosing dependent on interventional arm parameter.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 82 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. All patients must be able and willing to give written informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study protocol. 2. Diagnosis: ANCA vasculitis as defined by a positive MPO- and/or PR3-ANCA test together with clinical features characteristic of ANCA-positive diseases as detailed in the 2012 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Definitions(18). 3. eGFR ≥ 73 cc/min/1.73m2 4. Age: 18-82 years old 5. Treated with rituximab-induced continuous B cell depletion at regularly scheduled interval with a goal of undetectable B cells for at least 24 months 6. In sustained remission (defined by a modified BVAS-WG=0 AND a prednisone dose of ≤ 7.5 mg) for at least 12 months. 7. Undetectable (\<10mm3) B cells (quantified by CD20+ number) on day 0 8. Urine Hcg negative for women of child bearing potential and not planning to become pregnant for at least 12 months from enrollment and at least 12 months after any study related rituximab dose 9. Judged to be otherwise healthy by the Investigator, based on medical history and physical examination (no known active disease process for which life expectancy is less than 36 months)

Exclusion criteria

1. Secondary Disease: disease suspected to be induced by levamisole-adulterated cocaine 2. All transplanted patients 3. Treatment: additional immunosuppressive agents other than rituximab and/or total daily prednisone dose ≥ 7.5 milligrams 4. Hypogammaglobulinemia: IgG level \< 300 mg/dL 5. Terminal cancer or other primary illness with life expectancy of less than 36 months 6. Active anti-GBM disease and other known autoimmune disease for which the need for additional immunosuppression is likely 7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Disease Relapse(s) as Defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegner's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) ≥ 2Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)Relapses recording period was from 6/1/2016 to 12/31/2021. The outcome was reported as the number of participants with disease relapse who had either positive ANCA titers specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO-ANCA) or proteinase 3 (PR3-ANCA). The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG ) is a form with 34 predefined items grouped into 9 organ systems. The items are clinical features observed in patients with active ANCA vasculitis. Each item has a specified weight of either 3 or 1, depending on whether it reflects major or minor disease activity. The total BVAS/WG score is the weighted sum of individual manifestations that are present and believed to be due to active ANCA vasculitis. Higher scores reflect more active disease. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 64.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of Disease Relapse (Defined a BVAS/WG ≥ 2) and Serious Adverse EventsMedian follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)Number of disease relapse added with the number of SAE in each group
Number of Patients With HypogammaglobulinemiaMedian follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)Hypogammaglobulinemia defined as an IgG \< 250mg/dL
Patient Survival5.5 yearsnumber of deaths throughout the study.
Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresAssessed throughout the study period, every 6 months unless such time point was not reached or was missed by the patient. Median follow-up period is of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used in health economics as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Number of Patients Affected by Serious Adverse EventsMedian follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)Number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs), including all episodes of late onset neutropenia (LON). SAE are defined in the Serious adverse event section. Serious adverse events were reported over the entire study period (5.5 years)
Organ Damage as Assessed by the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI).3 years starting at inclusionThe Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) is a validated formal assessment tool in ANCA-associated vasculitis clinical trials. The VDI distinguishes vasculitis-induced chronic damage from active inflammation or persistent disease. Each item represents a disease manifestation and is given a score (of 1) if present for at least 3 months. Neither the cause of damage (vasculitis vs treatment) nor an ongoing activity are taken into consideration. The VDI includes 64 items categorized into 11 groups (by organ system) and the scored items are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 64. A higher score means more accrued damage.
Number of Major Relapses Defined as a BVAS/WG ≥ 3Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG ) is a form with 34 predefined items grouped into 9 organ systems. The items are clinical features observed in patients with active ANCA vasculitis. Each item has a specified weight of either 3 or 1, depending on whether it reflects major or minor disease activity. The total BVAS/WG score is the weighted sum of individual manifestations that are present and believed to be due to active ANCA vasculitis. Higher scores reflect more active disease. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 64.
Number of InfectionsMedian follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)Number of infections mild and severe, whether they were treated or not with antibiotics
Mean Number of Rituximab Infusions Per SubjectMedian follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)The rituximab utilization was measured in how many times a subject received Rituximab throughout the study which was then averaged for all subjects in each treatment arm, including those who did not receive any infusion.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
B Cell Reconstitution
Subjects will not receive their regularly-scheduled every-six-month dose of rituximab (1000mg IV) and will instead receive rituximab 1000 mg IV x 1 dose only once peripheral B cells return ( ≥ 10 B cells/mm3). This cycle will then re-start. Subjects will be seen in clinic every three months. Patients will continue to be dosed with rituximab (1 dose of 1000mg IV) each time the B cell count rises to 10 cells/mm3. In the unique scenario that the B cells are detectable, but less than the threshold of 10 cells/mm3, subjects will be asked to return in 6 weeks for repeat B cell testing. Rituximab: re-dosing dependent on interventional arm parameter.
58
Serologic ANCA Flare
Subjects will not receive regularly scheduled every six-month doses of rituximab (1000mg IV) and will instead be seen in clinic for ANCA titer monitoring every 3 months. Re-dosing will occur upon a significant ANCA titer increase. For MPO, a significant rise will be defined as a 5-fold rise in ANCA titer and a level greater than 4 times the cutoff value for the assay. For PR3, a significant rise will be defined as a 4-fold rise in ANCA titer to a level at least twofold above the cutoff for the assay. Subjects who sustain a significant increase in ANCA titer will receive rituximab 1000mg IV x 2 doses, spaced \ 2-3 weeks apart. If the ANCA titer remains two-fold above baseline and above a specified threshold (the cutoff value of the assay for PR3 and 4 times the cutoff value for MPO) , subjects will continue to receive rituximab 1000mg IV every 6 months for a maximum of 2 doses, at which time a new baseline ANCA titer will be established and the cycle will re-start. In this arm, rituximab administration is not contingent upon B cell levels but on significant ANCA titer rise as described above. Baseline ANCA titer will be recalculated to an average of the two highest of the last four values if all four are less than the original baseline. Patients in the ANCA arm will move to once yearly CD20 testing after CD20 levels return to normal levels (\>90 cells/uL).
57
Total115

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event41
Overall StudyCancer10
Overall StudyMajor relapse with ILD, BVAS-WG ≥ 323
Overall StudyMajor relapse without ILD, BVAS-WG ≥ 324
Overall StudyMinor relapse, BVAS-WG = 217
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyRequiring glucocorticoids03
Overall StudySerious Adverse Event, Related, infection, COVID-19, with death20
Overall StudySerious Adverse Event, Related, infection, COVID-19, without death41
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSerologic ANCA FlareTotalB Cell Reconstitution
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
23 Participants45 Participants22 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
34 Participants70 Participants36 Participants
Age, Continuous62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
ANCA serotype
Anti-MPO
26 Participants53 Participants27 Participants
ANCA serotype
Anti-PR3
31 Participants62 Participants31 Participants
BVAS/WG at entry0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
HD dependent
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
ILD
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
Otitis
17 Participants34 Participants17 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
Pulmonary Hemorrhage
13 Participants19 Participants6 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis (RPGN)
15 Participants35 Participants20 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
Renal involvement (including RPGN, required Hemodialysis and HD dependent)
30 Participants61 Participants31 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
Required Hemodialysis
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
Scleritis
13 Participants31 Participants18 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
Sinusitis
26 Participants56 Participants30 Participants
Clinical manifestations at diagnosis
Tracheal Stenosis
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Continuous Rituximab prior to entry
Less than 3 years at entry
28 Participants57 Participants29 Participants
Continuous Rituximab prior to entry
More than 3 years at entry
29 Participants58 Participants29 Participants
Creatinine at entry1.09 mg/dL1.08 mg/dL1.04 mg/dL
Disease status
Newly diagnosed
40 Participants82 Participants42 Participants
Disease status
Previous relapse
17 Participants33 Participants16 Participants
eGFR at entry60 cc/min/1.73m^260 cc/min/1.73m^260 cc/min/1.73m^2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
56 Participants114 Participants58 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ig levels at entry
IgG
750 mg/dL710 mg/dL699 mg/dL
Ig levels at entry
IgM
31 mg/dL29 mg/dL23 mg/dL
Induction Regimen- Plasma Exchange9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants
Induction Regimen- Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide
12 Participants22 Participants10 Participants
Induction Regimen- Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab
32 Participants64 Participants32 Participants
Induction Regimen- Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide
Rituximab
13 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
53 Participants108 Participants55 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 participants115 participants58 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants56 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants59 Participants28 Participants
VDI at entry1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 580 / 57
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 5844 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 5814 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Disease Relapse(s) as Defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegner's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) ≥ 2

Relapses recording period was from 6/1/2016 to 12/31/2021. The outcome was reported as the number of participants with disease relapse who had either positive ANCA titers specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO-ANCA) or proteinase 3 (PR3-ANCA). The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG ) is a form with 34 predefined items grouped into 9 organ systems. The items are clinical features observed in patients with active ANCA vasculitis. Each item has a specified weight of either 3 or 1, depending on whether it reflects major or minor disease activity. The total BVAS/WG score is the weighted sum of individual manifestations that are present and believed to be due to active ANCA vasculitis. Higher scores reflect more active disease. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 64.

Time frame: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
B Cell ReconstitutionNumber of Patients With Disease Relapse(s) as Defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegner's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) ≥ 2PR31 Participants
B Cell ReconstitutionNumber of Patients With Disease Relapse(s) as Defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegner's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) ≥ 2MPO4 Participants
Serologic ANCA FlareNumber of Patients With Disease Relapse(s) as Defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegner's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) ≥ 2PR37 Participants
Serologic ANCA FlareNumber of Patients With Disease Relapse(s) as Defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegner's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) ≥ 2MPO7 Participants
Comparison: The difference between the two treatment strategies was assessed using the log-rank test. P values of 0.05 were considered significant. Both rows were included and combined in the statistical analysis (ANCA-PR3 and ANCA-MPO) to assess the difference in treatment strategies.~Null hypothesis: No difference in the ANCA and B-cell arm in the probability of relapses.p-value: 0.04595% CI: [0.15, 0.9]Log Rank
Secondary

Composite of Disease Relapse (Defined a BVAS/WG ≥ 2) and Serious Adverse Events

Number of disease relapse added with the number of SAE in each group

Time frame: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
B Cell ReconstitutionComposite of Disease Relapse (Defined a BVAS/WG ≥ 2) and Serious Adverse Events27 Number of events
Serologic ANCA FlareComposite of Disease Relapse (Defined a BVAS/WG ≥ 2) and Serious Adverse Events36 Number of events
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores

The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used in health economics as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

Time frame: Assessed throughout the study period, every 6 months unless such time point was not reached or was missed by the patient. Median follow-up period is of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)

Population: We collected data using the SF-36 on the quality of life due to its importance in the long-term treatment of ANCA vasculitis. Questionnaires were given to patients every 6 months throughout the study period. Some participants do not have scores at certain time points due to either a missed visit or not being enrolled anymore in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 30 months85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 6 months65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 30 months74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 12 months92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 30 months87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 36 months58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 30 months64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 12 months81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 30 months81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 6 months79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 30 months90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 12 months66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 30 months86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 36 months76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 30 months60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 18 months83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 42 months76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 6 months79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 42 months58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 49
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 18 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 42 months67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 47
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 36 months83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 42 months60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 18 months88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 42 months77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 6 months66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 42 months85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 18 months69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 42 months83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 36 months69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 42 months59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 18 months85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 48 months65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 6 months83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 48 months67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 52
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 18 months96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 48 months67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 52
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 36 months60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 48 months52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 18 months84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 48 months73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 36 months74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 48 months65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 18 months68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 48 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 12 months79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 48 months61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 24 months83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 54 months88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 54 months50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 58
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 54 months67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 54 months67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 54 months84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 54 months84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 54 months81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 54 months59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 60 months72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 6 months66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 60 months33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 58
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 24 months71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 60 months100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 12 months61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 43
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 60 months48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 24 months84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 60 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 36 months50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 47
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 60 months63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 24 months68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 60 months53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 12 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 60 months58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 6 months84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 24 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 6 months89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 24 months91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/ fatigue at 12 months65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 24 months81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 36 months65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 46
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 24 months69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
B Cell ReconstitutionHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 12 months86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 60 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 6 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 6 months65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 45
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 6 months75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 6 months67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 6 months81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 6 months88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 6 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 6 months63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 36 months88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 36 months79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 36 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 36 months73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 36 months84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 36 months95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 36 months87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 36 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 12 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 12 months63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 43
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 12 months68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/ fatigue at 12 months65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 12 months81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 12 months86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 12 months80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 12 months63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 18 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 18 months62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 18 months74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 18 months68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 18 months81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 18 months92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 18 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 18 months67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 24 months88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 24 months71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 24 months80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 24 months76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 24 months85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 24 months94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 24 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 24 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 30 months88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 30 months72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 30 months80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 30 months72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 30 months84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 30 months94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 30 months83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 30 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 42 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 42 months60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 42 months76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 42 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 42 months85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 42 months87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 42 months82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 42 months63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 48 months95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 48 months100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 48 months100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 48 months75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 48 months85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 48 months100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 48 months80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral health at 48 months75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical functioning at 60 months92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/physical at 60 months100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresRole functioning/emotional at 60 months89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEnergy/fatigue at 60 months71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional well-being at 60 months83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial functioning at 60 months92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Serologic ANCA FlareHealth-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain at 60 months83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Secondary

Mean Number of Rituximab Infusions Per Subject

The rituximab utilization was measured in how many times a subject received Rituximab throughout the study which was then averaged for all subjects in each treatment arm, including those who did not receive any infusion.

Time frame: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
B Cell ReconstitutionMean Number of Rituximab Infusions Per Subject3.6 Infusions per subjectStandard Deviation 2.4
Serologic ANCA FlareMean Number of Rituximab Infusions Per Subject0.5 Infusions per subjectStandard Deviation 1.5
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no difference in the mean number of infusions per patient in each arm.p-value: <1t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Infections

Number of infections mild and severe, whether they were treated or not with antibiotics

Time frame: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
B Cell ReconstitutionNumber of InfectionsSerious Adverse Events- Infections12 number of events
B Cell ReconstitutionNumber of InfectionsAdverse Events- Infections72 number of events
Serologic ANCA FlareNumber of InfectionsSerious Adverse Events- Infections6 number of events
Serologic ANCA FlareNumber of InfectionsAdverse Events- Infections59 number of events
Secondary

Number of Major Relapses Defined as a BVAS/WG ≥ 3

The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG ) is a form with 34 predefined items grouped into 9 organ systems. The items are clinical features observed in patients with active ANCA vasculitis. Each item has a specified weight of either 3 or 1, depending on whether it reflects major or minor disease activity. The total BVAS/WG score is the weighted sum of individual manifestations that are present and believed to be due to active ANCA vasculitis. Higher scores reflect more active disease. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 64.

Time frame: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
B Cell ReconstitutionNumber of Major Relapses Defined as a BVAS/WG ≥ 34 number of events
Serologic ANCA FlareNumber of Major Relapses Defined as a BVAS/WG ≥ 37 number of events
Comparison: The difference between the two treatment strategies was assessed using the log-rank test. P values of 0.05 were considered significant.~Null hypothesis: No difference in the ANCA and B-cell arm in the probability of relapsesp-value: 0.4295% CI: [0.5, 5.36]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Patients Affected by Serious Adverse Events

Number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs), including all episodes of late onset neutropenia (LON). SAE are defined in the Serious adverse event section. Serious adverse events were reported over the entire study period (5.5 years)

Time frame: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
B Cell ReconstitutionNumber of Patients Affected by Serious Adverse Events15 Participants
Serologic ANCA FlareNumber of Patients Affected by Serious Adverse Events14 Participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: No difference in the proportion of patients with SAEs in each armp-value: 0.87Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Patients With Hypogammaglobulinemia

Hypogammaglobulinemia defined as an IgG \< 250mg/dL

Time frame: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
B Cell ReconstitutionNumber of Patients With Hypogammaglobulinemia1 Participants
Serologic ANCA FlareNumber of Patients With Hypogammaglobulinemia0 Participants
Secondary

Organ Damage as Assessed by the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI).

The Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) is a validated formal assessment tool in ANCA-associated vasculitis clinical trials. The VDI distinguishes vasculitis-induced chronic damage from active inflammation or persistent disease. Each item represents a disease manifestation and is given a score (of 1) if present for at least 3 months. Neither the cause of damage (vasculitis vs treatment) nor an ongoing activity are taken into consideration. The VDI includes 64 items categorized into 11 groups (by organ system) and the scored items are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 64. A higher score means more accrued damage.

Time frame: 3 years starting at inclusion

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
B Cell ReconstitutionOrgan Damage as Assessed by the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI).VDI at inclusion1.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
B Cell ReconstitutionOrgan Damage as Assessed by the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI).VDI at 3 years1.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Serologic ANCA FlareOrgan Damage as Assessed by the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI).VDI at inclusion1.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Serologic ANCA FlareOrgan Damage as Assessed by the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI).VDI at 3 years1.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Comparison: Null hypothesis: there is no difference in the mean change from baseline Vasculitis Damage Index between each arm. A t-test was used.p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-0.34, -0.06]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Patient Survival

number of deaths throughout the study.

Time frame: 5.5 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
B Cell ReconstitutionPatient Survival2 number of deaths
Serologic ANCA FlarePatient Survival0 number of deaths

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026