Skip to content

Efficacy of rTMS in Bipolar Depression

A Randomized Double-blind Sham-controlled Trial of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Acute Bipolar Depression

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02749006
Acronym
rTMS-BD
Enrollment
37
Registered
2016-04-22
Start date
2016-10-05
Completion date
2020-12-30
Last updated
2025-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Depression

Keywords

Bipolar disorder, Depression, intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (rTMS), neuromodulatory technique

Brief summary

Bipolar Disorder is a common condition that is characterized by periods of mood elevation however periods of chronic and recurring depressive episodes are more common and can be severely disabling. Effective treatments exist, however a significant portion of bipolar depressed patients do not respond to, or have difficulty tolerating many of these interventions. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique that is effective in major depression and there is evidence for its efficacy in bipolar depression which needs to be assessed in larger randomized controlled trials. This study is a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial over four weeks. The primary objective is to assess improvement in depressive symptoms in acute bipolar depressed patients on treatment with intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) in comparison to sham-rTMS.

Detailed description

rTMS is a treatment that involves stimulating a certain area of the brain with magnetic field pulses. Over time, the magnetic field pulses can gradually change the activity level of the stimulated brain region and help symptoms of bipolar depression. The device used in this study has been approved by Health Canada for therapeutic use since 2002. Participants will complete a screen visit to determine eligibility based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. If the participants are not eligible, no further study procedures will be conducted. Eligible subjects will be randomized to receive either active iTBS-rTMS or sham rTMS treatment (scalp stimulation with no magnetic pulse) daily for four weeks (20 sessions) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). All participants will complete a MRI (to target the left DLPFC region of the brain and functional activity), EEG & fNIRS, lab work, and neurocognitive testing prior to the commencement and post rTMS treatment. Efficacy, safety and tolerability will be evaluated at screen visit, during daily rTMS treatments, clinic visits and post rTMS treatment. All participants will have a phone interview two weeks post rTMS treatment.

Interventions

rTMS is a non-invasive procedure in which cerebral electrical activity is influenced by a rapidly changing magnetic field. The magnetic field is created by a plastic-encased coil which is placed over the patient's scalp. The magnetic field can be directed onto specific areas of the brain. rTMS can modulate cerebral activity by low or high frequencies. Over time, the magnetic field pulses can gradually change the activity level of the stimulated brain region and help symptoms of bipolar depression.

DEVICESham rTMS

Sham rTMS involves a click replicating the sound of the magnetic discharge, without any magnetic pulse being delivered.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Are a male or female aged 18 to 70 years. * Have a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder with a current ongoing episode of depression. * Are not currently experiencing a mania. * Have failed to achieve a clinical response or have been unable to tolerate an adequate dose of at least one of the medications used for treating Bipolar depression * Are taking an anti-manic agent (lithium or valproate) or an atypical antipsychotic (quetiapine, lurasidone, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, risperidone, olanzapine), or a combination of the above, or a combination of any of them with lamotrigine 100-400 mg daily. Lamotrigine alone for bipolar II disorder is permitted. * current medications have been at a stable dose in the 2 weeks prior to randomization * Are capable of understanding, consenting to, and complying with the requirements of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Have an alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within the last 3 months. * Are at a significant risk of harm to themselves or others * Are pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant in near future or lactating. * Have a personal or family history of seizures. * Have a history of unstable or inadequately treated medical illnesses, including moderate to severe brain injury or head trauma. * Have a primary diagnosis of other psychiatric disorders (other than Bipolar) or personality disorders that are of primary concern and causing greater impairment other than bipolar disorder. * are currently taking more than 3 of the antipsychotics. * Have failed a course of ECT in the current episode. * History of non-response to rTMS treatment. * If participating in psychotherapy, you must have been in stable treatment for at least 3 months prior to entry into the study, * Currently (or in the last 4 weeks) taking more than 2 mg daily (or equivalent) of lorazepam or any dose of medication for seizures * Have a pacemaker, or an implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth that cannot be safely removed. * Have a non-correctable clinically significant sensory impairment (i.e., cannot hear well enough to cooperate with interview).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale ScoreBaseline, Week 2, Week 4The primary outcome was the change in score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale from baseline to study end. A higher score means a worse outcome. Min value is 0, Max value is 60

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Meeting Criteria for Clinical RemissionBaseline to Week 4 (assessed at Week 2 and Week 4, Week 4 reported)Clinical Remission is defined as a MADRS score ≤12
Overall Well BeingBaseline to 4 weeksThe visual analog scale (VAS) is a self report measure that captures the over all well being. Min 0-worse health to Max 100- best health.
Brief Illness Perception QuestionnaireBaseline to 4 weeksBrief Illness Perception Questionnaire measures participant's perception of illness. Min = 0 Max = 80. Higher score means worse outcome.
Number of Participants With Clinical ResponseBaseline to Week 4 (assessed at Week 2 and Week 4, Week 4 reported)Response rates are defined as patients showing ≥50% reduction in MADRS scores.
Quality of Life QuestionnaireBaseline to 4 weeksThe Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder scale is a 56 item scale which assesses 12 core and 2 optional (work and study) domains, each containing four self-report items (1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree). An overall score (range: 48-240) may be calculated by summing responses to the 48 items of the core 12 domains. Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction with a person's quality of life.
Patient Global Impression Rating Scale: SeverityBaseline to 4 weeksPatient Global Impression Rating Scale: Severity rates how depressed the participant is at the current time. 1-4 (1 is normal and 4 is severe)
Patient Global Impression Rating Scale- ImprovementWeek 4Rates current depression compared to baseline. Min =1 Max =7 Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Baseline to 4 weeksThe Sheehan Disability Scale is a five-item, self-rated questionnaire designed to measure the extent to which a patient's disability due to an illness interferes with work/school, social life/leisure activities, and family life/home responsibilities. Each subscale score (a work disability, a social life disability, a family life disability) is combined into a single total score (sum of the non missing responses for items 1-3) representing a global impairment rating, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicative of significant functional impairment.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited by referral, as well as online and community advertisements 2 Canadian centers (University of British Columbia \[UBC\], British Columbia, Canada; and University of Calgary \[UC\], Alberta, Canada) between October 2016 and March 2020 .

Pre-assignment details

Of the 71 assessed for eligibility 37 were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active iTBS rTMS
The active arm involves magnetic stimulation of the brain to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) daily for four weeks. The active arm will be receiving intermittent Theta-Burst (iTBS) repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to deliver magnetic pulses. iTBS repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): rTMS is a non-invasive procedure in which cerebral electrical activity is influenced by a rapidly changing magnetic field. The magnetic field is created by a plastic-encased coil which is placed over the patient's scalp. The magnetic field can be directed onto specific areas of the brain. rTMS can modulate cerebral activity by low or high frequencies. Over time, the magnetic field pulses can gradually change the activity level of the stimulated brain region and help symptoms of bipolar depression.
18
Sham rTMS
sham rTMS treatment involves scalp stimulation with no magnetic pulse daily for four weeks (20 sessions). Sham rTMS involves only the click replicating the sound of the magnetic discharge, without any magnetic pulse being delivered. Sham rTMS: Sham rTMS involves a click replicating the sound of the magnetic discharge, without any magnetic pulse being delivered.
19
Total37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalActive iTBS rTMSSham rTMS
Age, Continuous43.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.87
44.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.71
43.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.34
Primary Diagnosis
Bipolar disorder type I
21 Participants11 Participants10 Participants
Primary Diagnosis
Bipolar disorder type II
16 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
35 Participants17 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants11 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants7 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 79 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale Score

The primary outcome was the change in score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale from baseline to study end. A higher score means a worse outcome. Min value is 0, Max value is 60

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4

Population: Diagnosis of BD type I or type II by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria, experiencing a major depressive episode (MDE).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active iTBS rTMSMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale ScoreBaseline32.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.04
Active iTBS rTMSMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale ScoreWeek 224.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.09
Active iTBS rTMSMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale ScoreWeek 424.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.82
Sham rTMSMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale ScoreBaseline31.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.22
Sham rTMSMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale ScoreWeek 225.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.24
Sham rTMSMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scale ScoreWeek 423.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.58
Secondary

Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire

Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire measures participant's perception of illness. Min = 0 Max = 80. Higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

Population: Not all participants completed the questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active iTBS rTMSBrief Illness Perception QuestionnaireBaseline60.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
Active iTBS rTMSBrief Illness Perception QuestionnaireWeek 457.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.27
Sham rTMSBrief Illness Perception QuestionnaireBaseline59.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.21
Sham rTMSBrief Illness Perception QuestionnaireWeek 458.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.37
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting Criteria for Clinical Remission

Clinical Remission is defined as a MADRS score ≤12

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4 (assessed at Week 2 and Week 4, Week 4 reported)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active iTBS rTMSNumber of Participants Meeting Criteria for Clinical Remission3 Participants
Sham rTMSNumber of Participants Meeting Criteria for Clinical Remission3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Response

Response rates are defined as patients showing ≥50% reduction in MADRS scores.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4 (assessed at Week 2 and Week 4, Week 4 reported)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active iTBS rTMSNumber of Participants With Clinical Response3 Participants
Sham rTMSNumber of Participants With Clinical Response3 Participants
Secondary

Overall Well Being

The visual analog scale (VAS) is a self report measure that captures the over all well being. Min 0-worse health to Max 100- best health.

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active iTBS rTMSOverall Well BeingBaseline41.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.29
Active iTBS rTMSOverall Well BeingWeek 458.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.13
Sham rTMSOverall Well BeingWeek 446.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.09
Sham rTMSOverall Well BeingBaseline35.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Secondary

Patient Global Impression Rating Scale- Improvement

Rates current depression compared to baseline. Min =1 Max =7 Higher scores mean worse outcome.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Not all participants completed the scale.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active iTBS rTMSPatient Global Impression Rating Scale- Improvement3.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Sham rTMSPatient Global Impression Rating Scale- Improvement3.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Secondary

Patient Global Impression Rating Scale: Severity

Patient Global Impression Rating Scale: Severity rates how depressed the participant is at the current time. 1-4 (1 is normal and 4 is severe)

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

Population: Not all participants completed the scale at Week 4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active iTBS rTMSPatient Global Impression Rating Scale: SeverityBaseline3.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Active iTBS rTMSPatient Global Impression Rating Scale: SeverityWeek 42.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Sham rTMSPatient Global Impression Rating Scale: SeverityBaseline3.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Sham rTMSPatient Global Impression Rating Scale: SeverityWeek 42.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaire

The Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder scale is a 56 item scale which assesses 12 core and 2 optional (work and study) domains, each containing four self-report items (1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree). An overall score (range: 48-240) may be calculated by summing responses to the 48 items of the core 12 domains. Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction with a person's quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

Population: Not all participants completed the questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active iTBS rTMSQuality of Life QuestionnaireBaseline109 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.67
Active iTBS rTMSQuality of Life QuestionnaireWeek 4136.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.81
Sham rTMSQuality of Life QuestionnaireBaseline108.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.34
Sham rTMSQuality of Life QuestionnaireWeek 4130.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.54
Secondary

Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

The Sheehan Disability Scale is a five-item, self-rated questionnaire designed to measure the extent to which a patient's disability due to an illness interferes with work/school, social life/leisure activities, and family life/home responsibilities. Each subscale score (a work disability, a social life disability, a family life disability) is combined into a single total score (sum of the non missing responses for items 1-3) representing a global impairment rating, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicative of significant functional impairment.

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active iTBS rTMSSheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Baseline23.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.09
Active iTBS rTMSSheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 419.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.32
Sham rTMSSheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Baseline23.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.43
Sham rTMSSheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Week 419.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.26

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026