Skip to content

A Comparison Laparoscopic With Open Gastric Cancer Surgery for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Prospective Multicenter Study on Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery Compared With Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02748551
Enrollment
800
Registered
2016-04-22
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2016-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Cancer

Keywords

Gastric cancer, locally advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic procedure, comparison laparoscopic with open procedure, multicenter trials

Brief summary

Nowadays, the proportion of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer is estimated up to 90 percent of all gastric cancer cases in Russian Federation. Surgical procedure with D2 Lymphadenectomy is the main option for treatment. Conventional open approach is still the current standard for advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopic procedures for gastric cancer as minimally invasive surgery has gained popularity for the treatment of early gastric cancer in East Asia. Several studies indicated that laparoscopic procedures both total and subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is a technically feasible and safe procedure by experienced surgeons in high-volume specialized hospitals. However, lack of solid evidence on the oncologic efficacy. Starting clinical trials for evaluate safety of oncology laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Aim of this trial is show safety, feasibility and oncologic efficacy of Laparoscopic radical surgical procedures both total and subtotal gastrectomy for treatment gastric cancer.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic procedures

Laparoscopic surgery

PROCEDUREOpen Surgery

Open surgery

Sponsors

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 82 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ECOG 0-1 * ASA I-III * Histologically proven cancer of the stomach cT 2-4a(clinical stage tumor), N0-3, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual Seventh Edition * Preoperative examination with no distant metastasis, no significantly enlarged lymph nodes around abdominal main artery, and tumor not a direct violation of the pancreas, spleen and other surrounding organs * The gastric tumors are located in the stomach, are macroscopically resectable by subtotal or total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically apparent distant metastasis * Free cancer cells * Bulky lymph node metastasis is detected by abdominal CT * Previous treatment with radiation therapy for any tumors. * Previous surgery for the present disease * Pregnancy * Psychiatric disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Surgical Morbidity21 days.Major Surgical morbidity is defined as the complication grade on III-V Clavien-Dindo Classification which occurs with-in postoperative 21 days, extension of hospitalization and re-hospitalization. It is necessary to evaluate the complication and if it occurs during the hospitalization, it is required to record complication name, date of on-set (postoperatively), grade on Clavien-Dindo Classification and treatment for complication.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3-year overall survival6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 monthsIn terms of locally advanced gastric cancer, to evaluate the overall survival rate in laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection at postoperative 3 years compared with open procedures
5-year overall survival rate6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48 and 60 monthsIn terms of locally advanced gastric cancer, to evaluate the overall survival rate in laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection at postoperative 5 years compared with open procedures
Surgical Mortality90 daysIt is defined as the death within postoperative 90 days regardless of postoperative reason.
Peri-operative blood loss1 dayMinimally-invasive surgery is associated with less peri-operative blood loss. Blood loss will be measured in milliliters and average blood loss will be compared to the conventional 'open' group.
3-year progression-free survival36 monthsIn terms of locally advanced gastric cancer, to evaluate the progression-free survival rate in laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection at postoperative 3 years compared with open procedures
Pain scoresup to 3 days after surgeryPain scores based on a visual analog scale the day of surgery and the subsequent 3 days postoperative 1 days, 2 days, 3 days
Postoperative quality of life6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 monthsBoth the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) C30 and STO22 are analyzed with quality of life
long-term surgical morbidity21days - 36 months after surgerySurgical morbidity is defined as the events which occurs with-in postoperative 21 days - 36 months after surgery. It is necessary to evaluate the complication, it is required to record complication name, date of on-set. Long complications are included: hernia, bleeding, bowel obstruction etc.
Extent of lymph node dissection2 weeksThe extent of lymph node dissection in treatment of gastric cancer is considered a prognostic marker for postoperative survival and disease-free survival. Before implementation of a new surgical technique, it is imperative that this technique is non-inferior with regard to the extent of lymph node dissection. Measures will include the number of resected lymph nodes and the number of resected lymph node stations.
Postoperative recovery index10 daysTime to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet, soft diet, and duration of hospital stay are used to assess the postoperative recovery course The amount of abdominal drainage and blood transfusion are also recorded

Countries

Russia, Ukraine

Contacts

Primary ContactIgor Khathov, MD, PhD
ihatkov@gmail.com8 (495) 3042908
Backup ContactRoman Izrailov, MD, PhD
izrailev@mail.ru8 (495) 3042908

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026