Skip to content

Efficacy of Metacognitive Training Single Modules: Jumping to Conclusions and To Empathize...

Efficacy of Metacognitive Training Single Modules: Jumping to Conclusions and To Empathize... Among Patients of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Ward With Diagnosis of Schizophrenia.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02748486
Enrollment
38
Registered
2016-04-22
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2016-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders

Keywords

schizophrenia, randomized controlled trial, metacognitive training, single sessions

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether modules of Metacognitive Training: Jumping to Conclusions and To empathize... are effective in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Also it was investigated whether these modules have specific impact on cognitive biases severity.

Detailed description

Investigators employ randomized controlled trial design. Patients in ward were recruited for the study in three waves. In each wave patients were assessed pre-intervention, then randomly allocated in one of three groups: with modules of Metacognitive Training or control group. Then patients were assessed post-intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMetacognitive Training Jumping to Conclusion

Therapeutical intervention based on cognitive-behavioural therapy paradigm. Addresses cognitive bias of schizophrenia patients - jumping to conclusion.

Group discussion of current events

BEHAVIORALMetacognitive Training To Empathize

Therapeutical intervention based on cognitive-behavioural therapy paradigm. Addresses cognitive bias of schizophrenia patients - Theory of Mind deficits.

Sponsors

Medical University of Warsaw
CollaboratorOTHER
Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of psychotic disorders * informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* neurological disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fish Taskup to 3h after interventionvariation of Beads Task used for measurement of jumping to conclusion
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Testup to 3h after interventionused for measurement of Theory of Mind aspects
Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosisup to 3h after interventionused for measurement of cognitive biases characteristic for psychotic patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Checklist 27 plusup to 3h after interventionscreening tool for psychopathology symptoms
Paranoia Checklistup to 3h after interventionquestionnaire used for assessment of paranoid ideation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026