Skip to content

Hand & Foot Nocturnal Enuresis TENS Study

Pilot Study: Hand & Foot Neuromodulation for Nocturnal Enuresis in Children

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02747849
Enrollment
27
Registered
2016-04-22
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2023-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bedwetting

Brief summary

The investigators believe in order to strengthen the evidence in support of transcutaneous foot stimulation in this population the investigators need to move forward with a randomized comparison study using the TENS device on the hand and foot as a control.

Detailed description

Nocturnal enuresis is a common problem in children which can have a dramatic psychological and social impact on quality of life. Neuromodulation by transcutaneous foot stimulation of peripheral tibial nerve branches has been shown to produce a prolonged inhibition of micturition reflex contractions and significantly increase bladder capacity. The investigators primary goal was to evaluate the effect of foot stimulation on the frequency of nocturnal enuresis episodes in children.

Interventions

DEVICETENS

Placebo had stimulator placed on hand. Active comparator had stimulator placed on foot. Amount of time, intensity, threshold voltage, pulsewidth and frequency remained the same for both arms.

Sponsors

The Coulter Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Rajeev Chaudhry
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Children ages 5 to 18 years old without any specific neurological disorder or urinary tract infection, clinically diagnosed as having nocturnal enuresis AT LEAST 4 episodes per month by history, nocturnal enuresis is a DSM V diagnosable medical condition 2. Currently having no daytime overactive bladder symptoms, i.e. urinary frequency, urgency, or daytime incontinence 3. Having been assessed for and treated if applicable for behavioral etiologies of nocturnal enuresis - consuming excess fluids or specific bladder irritants 4. Having been assessed for and treated if applicable for constipation

Exclusion criteria

1. Children with known neurological disorders which may be contributing to nocturnal enuresis episodes 2. Children found through history to have significant behavioral causes of nocturnal enuresis including consumption of excessive fluids or known bladder irritants 3. Children with chronic constipation who are non-compliant with previous pharmacologic efforts to treat. 4. Children who are not adequately potty trained 5. Children with significant daytime symptoms of overactive bladder including frequency, urgency, and daytime incontinence 6. Children who do not tolerate initial stimulation training session in the urology clinic upon enrollment 7. Children with any implantable medical devices such as a pacemaker will be excluded from the study Note: Any patient currently taking medication such as an anti-muscarinic or a tricyclic antidepressant for overactive bladder at time of enrollment will be eligible to participate and will be continued on their usual medication and dosage throughout the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Number of Nights Wet Per 2 Weeks6 weeksThe subject/parents will be instructed to record a night-time voiding log specifying the change in number of nights wet per 2 weeks. This log is included in the IRB application. Subjects/parents will fill out the log for a two week period prior to foot stimulation to determine a baseline average of nocturnal enuresis episodes, during week 3 and 4 of the study the subjects will stimulate either their foot or hand to measure any acute effect on nocturnal enuresis episodes and finally during week 5 and 6 of the study, after stimulation subjects will keep a log to evaluate any post-stimulation residual benefit
Response to TreatmentAn average of 6 weeksTotal number of participants that responded to treatment after stimulation with Hand or Foor unit.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hand Neuromodulation
The stimulation characteristics for this arm include a continuous frequency of 5 Hz, pulsewidth 0.2 ms, and intensity 2-4 times the threshold voltage required for finger twitching - or the intensity that the subject feels comfortable with. Subjects will be asked to use the stimulator for a minimum of 60 minutes prior to bedtime for two weeks, or longer if they can tolerate it, have the time, and accurately record the total duration. Stimulation will be performed during the first, second, and third weeks of the study. TENS: Placebo had stimulator placed on hand. Active comparator had stimulator placed on foot. Amount of time, intensity, threshold voltage, pulsewidth and frequency remained the same for both arms.
12
Foot Neuromodulation
The stimulation characteristics include a continuous frequency of 5 Hz, pulsewidth 0.2 ms, and intensity 2-4 times the threshold voltage required for inducing toe twitching - or the intensity that the subject feels comfortable with. The subjects will be asked to wear socks on their foot to prevent the electrodes from detachment and to stop the stimulation during walking or in any non-resting situation. Subjects will be asked to use the stimulator for a minimum of 60 minutes prior to bedtime for two weeks, or longer if they can tolerate it, have the time, and accurately record the total duration. Stimulation will be performed during the first, second, and third weeks of the study. TENS: Placebo had stimulator placed on hand. Active comparator had stimulator placed on foot. Amount of time, intensity, threshold voltage, pulsewidth and frequency remained the same for both arms.
14
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHand NeuromodulationFoot NeuromodulationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous12 years12.1 years12 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants14 participants26 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Did not identify
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Female
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Male
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Number of Nights Wet Per 2 Weeks

The subject/parents will be instructed to record a night-time voiding log specifying the change in number of nights wet per 2 weeks. This log is included in the IRB application. Subjects/parents will fill out the log for a two week period prior to foot stimulation to determine a baseline average of nocturnal enuresis episodes, during week 3 and 4 of the study the subjects will stimulate either their foot or hand to measure any acute effect on nocturnal enuresis episodes and finally during week 5 and 6 of the study, after stimulation subjects will keep a log to evaluate any post-stimulation residual benefit

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Patients with primary nocturnal enuresis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hand NeuromodulationChange in Number of Nights Wet Per 2 Weeks# nights wet before stimulation over 2 weeks11 # nights wet over 2 weeksStandard Deviation 3.46
Hand NeuromodulationChange in Number of Nights Wet Per 2 Weeks# nights wet during stimulation over 2 weeks8.75 # nights wet over 2 weeksStandard Deviation 3.99
Hand NeuromodulationChange in Number of Nights Wet Per 2 Weeks# nights wet after stimulation over 2 weeks9.5 # nights wet over 2 weeksStandard Deviation 3.82
Foot NeuromodulationChange in Number of Nights Wet Per 2 Weeks# nights wet before stimulation over 2 weeks8.78 # nights wet over 2 weeksStandard Deviation 4.12
Foot NeuromodulationChange in Number of Nights Wet Per 2 Weeks# nights wet during stimulation over 2 weeks6.22 # nights wet over 2 weeksStandard Deviation 4.21
Foot NeuromodulationChange in Number of Nights Wet Per 2 Weeks# nights wet after stimulation over 2 weeks6.78 # nights wet over 2 weeksStandard Deviation 5.19
Primary

Response to Treatment

Total number of participants that responded to treatment after stimulation with Hand or Foor unit.

Time frame: An average of 6 weeks

Population: Patients

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hand NeuromodulationResponse to Treatment8 Participants
Foot NeuromodulationResponse to Treatment9 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026