Skip to content

Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R U.S. Clinical Study (Evolut 34R Addendum)

Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R United States Clinical Study (Evolut 34R Addendum)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02746809
Enrollment
72
Registered
2016-04-21
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2021-12-15
Last updated
2023-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Brief summary

The study objectives are to assess the safety and efficacy of the CoreValve Evolut 34R transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) system in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are considered at high or extreme risk for surgical aortic valve replacement.

Detailed description

This objective will be accomplished by a prospective, single arm, historical controlled, multi-site study involving up to 60 implanted subjects at up to 15 study sites in the United States. Procedural and 30 day safety and efficacy results from this study will be compared to appropriate historical control data for the Medtronic CoreValve System. Subjects will be followed up to 5 years following implantation.

Interventions

DEVICECoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR system

The CoreValve Evolut 34R System is a transcatheter aortic valve implantation system comprised of the following three components: 1. Evolut 34R Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV) 2. EnVeo R Delivery Catheter System (DCS) with EnVeo R InLine Sheath 3. EnVeo R Loading System (LS)

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiovascular
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Severe aortic stenosis, defined as aortic valve area of \< 1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of \< 0.6 cm2/m2) by the continuity equation, AND mean gradient \> 40 mmHg or maximal aortic valve velocity \> 4.0 m/sec by resting echocardiogram. Subjects with low-flow/low gradient severe aortic stenosis can be included, provided low-dose dobutamine or exercise stress echocardiography demonstrates a mean gradient of \> 40 mmHg or a maximal aortic valve velocity of \> 4.0 m/sec, AND aortic valve area of \< 1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of \< 0.6 cm2/m2). 2. Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score of ≥ 8 OR documented heart team agreement of ≥ high risk for aortic valve replacement due to frailty or co-morbidities. 3. Symptoms of aortic stenosis, AND New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II or greater. 4. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

5. Any condition considered a contraindication for placement of a bioprosthetic valve (e.g. subject is indicated for mechanical prosthetic valve). 6. A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following which cannot be adequately pre-medicated: * aspirin or heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin * ticlopidine and clopidogrel * Nitinol (titanium or nickel) * contrast media 7. Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC \< 1000 mm3), thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000 cells/mm3), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states. 8. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization. 9. Severe left ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 20% by echocardiography, contrast ventriculography, or radionuclide ventriculography. 10. End stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis or creatinine clearance \< 20 cc/min. 11. Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis. 12. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure with a bare metal or drug eluting stent performed within 30 days prior to study procedure. 13. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or successful treatment of carotid stenosis within 10 weeks of Heart Team assessment. 14. Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support. 15. Recent (within 6 months of Heart Team assessment) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). 16. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation. 17. Subject refuses a blood transfusion. 18. Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits). 19. Estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions. 20. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-ups exams. 21. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study (excluding registries). 22. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 30 days before the study procedure. 23. Need for emergency surgery for any reason. 24. Liver failure (Child-Pugh class C). 25. Subject is pregnant or breast feeding. Anatomical

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality30 DaysPercentage of participants with all-cause mortality at 30 days
Percentage of Participants With Stroke (Disabling)30 DaysPercentage of participants with disabling stroke (VARC-II definitions) at 30 days
Device Success Rate24 hours to 7 days post implantationDevice Success defined as: * Absence of procedural mortality, AND * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, AND * Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve, defined as the absence of patient prosthesis-mismatch and mean gradient \< 20 mmHg (or peak velocity \< 3 m/sec), AND * Absence of moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation
The Percentage of Subjects With no More Than Mild Prosthetic Regurgitation at Early Post Procedure Echocardiogram24 hours to 7 days post implantationThe percentage of subjects with no more than mild prosthetic regurgitation at early post procedure echocardiogram as assessed by echo core laboratory

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Coronary Artery Obstruction30 daysPercentage of participants with coronary artery obstruction - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details
Percentage of Subjects With Valve-related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure30 daysPercentage of subjects with valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details
Percentage of Subjects With Permanent Pacemaker Implant at 30 Days30 daysPercentage of subjects with new permanent pacemaker implant at 30 days.
Percentage of Participants With VARC II Combined Safety Endpoint Event at 30 Days30 days post-implantationVARC II composite safety endpoint includes the following components: * All-cause mortality * All stroke (disabling and non-disabling) * Life-threatening bleeding * Acute kidney injury: stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy). * Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention. * Major vascular complication. * Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVR, or SAVR)
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics - Mean Gradient30 daysMean gradient (mmHg) as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics- Aortic Valve Area30 DaysAortic valve area as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics - Total Prosthetic Regurgitation Graded as None/Trace30 daysTotal prosthetic regurgitation (none/trace) as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory
Percentage of Resheath and Recapture SuccessImplant procedureSuccessful resheathing is defined as Evolut R TAV (including frame) was resheathed into the capsule of the delivery cathether to the desired amount intended, as verified by fluoroscopy. Successful recapture is defined as the entire Evolut R TAV (including frame) is resheathed into the capsule of the delivery catheter until there is no gap between the capsule and the tip, as verified by fluoroscopy.
Percentage of Participants With Life Threatening or Disabling Bleeding30 days post-implantationPercentage of participants with life threatening or disabling bleeding - see VARC-2 definitions for classification details
Percentage of Participants With Major Vascular Complication30 daysPercentage of participants with Major vascular complication - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details
Percentage of Participants With Acute Kidney Injury: Stage 2 or 330 daysPercentage of participants with Acute Kidney Injury: Stage 2 or 3 - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR System
Treatment of Aortic Stenosis with Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R 34R TAVR System.\> \> CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR system: The CoreValve Evolut 34R System is a transcatheter aortic valve implantation system comprised of the following three components:\> 1. Evolut 34R Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV)\> 2. EnVeo R Delivery Catheter System (DCS) with EnVeo R InLine Sheath\> 3. EnVeo R Loading System (LS)
60
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
12-MonthDeath3
12-MonthWithdrawal by Subject2
1-MonthDeath5
24-MonthDeath1
24-MonthWithdrawal by Subject1
36-MonthDeath8
36-MonthWithdrawal by Subject1
48-MonthDeath7
48-MonthWithdrawal by Subject1
60-MonthDeath1
60-MonthLost to Follow-up2
6-MonthDeath2
6-MonthWithdrawal by Subject1
EnrollmentExpected Enrollment Met2
EnrollmentInclusion Exclusion not met9
EnrollmentWithdrawal by Subject1
ProcedureDeath1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR System
Age, Continuous81.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
28 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
34 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Device Success Rate

Device Success defined as: * Absence of procedural mortality, AND * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, AND * Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve, defined as the absence of patient prosthesis-mismatch and mean gradient \< 20 mmHg (or peak velocity \< 3 m/sec), AND * Absence of moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation

Time frame: 24 hours to 7 days post implantation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemDevice Success Rate79.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality

Percentage of participants with all-cause mortality at 30 days

Time frame: 30 Days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality1.7 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Stroke (Disabling)

Percentage of participants with disabling stroke (VARC-II definitions) at 30 days

Time frame: 30 Days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Participants With Stroke (Disabling)0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

The Percentage of Subjects With no More Than Mild Prosthetic Regurgitation at Early Post Procedure Echocardiogram

The percentage of subjects with no more than mild prosthetic regurgitation at early post procedure echocardiogram as assessed by echo core laboratory

Time frame: 24 hours to 7 days post implantation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemThe Percentage of Subjects With no More Than Mild Prosthetic Regurgitation at Early Post Procedure Echocardiogram100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hemodynamic Performance Metrics- Aortic Valve Area

Aortic valve area as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory

Time frame: 30 Days

Population: Only participants with echo could be analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemHemodynamic Performance Metrics- Aortic Valve Area2.6 cm2Standard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Hemodynamic Performance Metrics - Mean Gradient

Mean gradient (mmHg) as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Only participants with echo could be analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemHemodynamic Performance Metrics - Mean Gradient6.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Hemodynamic Performance Metrics - Total Prosthetic Regurgitation Graded as None/Trace

Total prosthetic regurgitation (none/trace) as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Only participants with echo could be analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemHemodynamic Performance Metrics - Total Prosthetic Regurgitation Graded as None/Trace60.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Acute Kidney Injury: Stage 2 or 3

Percentage of participants with Acute Kidney Injury: Stage 2 or 3 - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Participants With Acute Kidney Injury: Stage 2 or 30.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Coronary Artery Obstruction

Percentage of participants with coronary artery obstruction - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Participants With Coronary Artery Obstruction0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Life Threatening or Disabling Bleeding

Percentage of participants with life threatening or disabling bleeding - see VARC-2 definitions for classification details

Time frame: 30 days post-implantation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Participants With Life Threatening or Disabling Bleeding1.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Major Vascular Complication

Percentage of participants with Major vascular complication - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Participants With Major Vascular Complication1.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With VARC II Combined Safety Endpoint Event at 30 Days

VARC II composite safety endpoint includes the following components: * All-cause mortality * All stroke (disabling and non-disabling) * Life-threatening bleeding * Acute kidney injury: stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy). * Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention. * Major vascular complication. * Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVR, or SAVR)

Time frame: 30 days post-implantation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Participants With VARC II Combined Safety Endpoint Event at 30 Days5.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Resheath and Recapture Success

Successful resheathing is defined as Evolut R TAV (including frame) was resheathed into the capsule of the delivery cathether to the desired amount intended, as verified by fluoroscopy. Successful recapture is defined as the entire Evolut R TAV (including frame) is resheathed into the capsule of the delivery catheter until there is no gap between the capsule and the tip, as verified by fluoroscopy.

Time frame: Implant procedure

Population: Success could only be analyzed in subjects where the resheath/recapture feature was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Resheath and Recapture Success100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Permanent Pacemaker Implant at 30 Days

Percentage of subjects with new permanent pacemaker implant at 30 days.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Subjects with pre-existing pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Subjects With Permanent Pacemaker Implant at 30 Days20.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Valve-related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure

Percentage of subjects with valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CoreValve Evolut 34R TAVR SystemPercentage of Subjects With Valve-related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure0.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026