Skip to content

Carpel Tunnel Syndrome and Physical Therapy Modalities

Pulsed Magnetic Field Versus Ultrasound in Treatment of Postnatal Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Randomized Control Trial on Female Egyptian Population

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02745652
Enrollment
55
Registered
2016-04-20
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2016-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

median nerve, wrist joint, carpal tunnel

Brief summary

Carpel tunnel syndrome (CTS) is very common complain during pregnancy with high percentage to continue postnatal. Conservative treatment is more recommended in these cases. There are many physical therapy modalities proposed to treat CTS without knowing which modality is better than the other. So the aim of this study to compare the effect of two modalities in treating CTS in postnatal females.

Detailed description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common peripheral nerve entrapment disorders in the upper limb. CTS is common during pregnancy especially in the third trimester as well, a significant percentage of females postnatal may still have some complaints up to at least 3 years postnatal. Purpose: To compare the effect of pulsed magnetic field (PEMF) versus ultrasound (US) in treating patients with CTS. Forty postnatal female patients with idiopathic CTS were assigned randomly into two equal groups. One group received PEMF with nerve and tendon gliding exercises for the wrist 3 times for week for 4 weeks. The other group received US plus the same exercises. Pain level, sensory and motor distal latencies of the median nerve (MSDL and MMDL), sensory and motor conduction velocities of the median nerve (MSCV and MMCV), functional status scale and hand grip strength were assessed pre and post treatment

Interventions

it is a magnetic device for magneto-therapy, it has an appliance, motorized bed, and applicable large solenoids which can be moved in 4 different positions according to the treatment area, and the additional small solenoid for hand treatment with 30 cm diameter

DEVICETherapeutic ultrasound

Ultrasound is applied using a transducer or applicator that is in direct contact with the patient's skin. Gel is a medium which is used on all surfaces of the head to reduce friction and assist transmission of the ultrasonic waves

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mild to moderate CTS * Positive electro diagnostic findings: prolonged median motor distal latency (MMDL) above 4 ms, and below 6ms. * Prolonged median sensory distal latency above 3.5 ms . * Positive Phalen and Tinel test. * Subjects scored pain intensity more than 5 in visual analogue scale (VAS).

Exclusion criteria

* severe cases with delayed motor distal latency \> 6ms. * Orthopedic or neurological disorders of neck or the upper limb as cervical radiculopathy. * Pronator teres syndrome or double crush syndrome. * Pre- existing CTS before their last pregnancy, current pregnancy. * Diabetic neuropathy and Thoracic outlet syndrome. * Wasting of thenar muscles, ulnar neuropathy. * Rheumatoid arthritis, previous fractured carpal bone and previous surgery in the forearm especially transverse ligament release

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity4 weeks change from the baseline scoresit measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).It is considered a valid way of assessing pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional status scale4 weeks change from the baseline scoresIt is a part of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (CTSQ). it asks about eight functional activities as writing, buttoning of clothes, gripping of a telephone handle

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026