Skip to content

Mirabegron as Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) for Ureteral Stones and Ureteral Stent Pain

A Double Blind Placebo Control Trial of Mirabegron for Medical Expulsive Therapy and to Manage Stent Pain for Ureteral Stones(Protocol # 01-16-20-02)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02744430
Enrollment
33
Registered
2016-04-20
Start date
2017-07-22
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2022-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Flank Pain, Ureteral Obstruction

Keywords

Medical expulsive therapy, ureteral stone, stent pain

Brief summary

The study will be a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of mirabegron for medical expulsive therapy (MET) in patients with a CT (Computed Tomography) scan-proven ureteral stone between 4 to 10 mm undergoing expectant management.

Detailed description

The study will be a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of mirabegron for medical expulsive therapy (MET) in patients with a CT scan-proven ureteral stone between 4 to 10 mm undergoing expectant management. Subjects will be distributed at a 1:1 ratio between the control and treatment groups. The treatment group will receive mirabegron and the control groups will receive a placebo. Both groups will receive analgesics and hydration will be recommended. All subjects will then be followed for 30 days to determine the proportion of subjects with spontaneous passage. Patients will record narcotic usage and pain scores during this time. If there is stone persistence in the ureter based on imaging (CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis versus renal ultrasound plus KUB), then the patient will undergo ureteroscopy with stent placement. In these patients, treatment will continue while the stent is in place and patients will fill out a validated questionnaire regarding stent pain.

Interventions

DRUGMirabegron

Randomized 1:1 ratio using a randomized block design, stratified by stone size (≤5 mm versus \>5 mm) and location (upper versus lower ureter). The randomization will be implemented through a database with software designed by the Director of Research Informatics at the Baylor College of Medicine's Dan Duncan Institute of Clinical and Translational Research. It will be a HIPPA-compliant secure database accessible via internet.

OTHERPlacebo

Randomized 1:1 ratio using a randomized block design, stratified by stone size (≤5 mm versus \>5 mm) and location (upper versus lower ureter). The randomization will be implemented through a database with software designed by the Director of Research Informatics at the Baylor College of Medicine's Dan Duncan Institute of Clinical and Translational Research. It will be a HIPPA-compliant secure database accessible via internet.

Sponsors

Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Single unilateral ureteral calculus 4 to 10 mm visible on CT scan within the ureter * Serum creatinine within normal range * Ability to tolerate oral fluids and oral pain medication * Able to make informed medical decisions regarding consent * Willingness to follow-up in the Urology Clinic in approximately 30 day * Willing to undergo ureteroscopic extraction should the stone not pass in this time period

Exclusion criteria

* Adults unable to consent * Age less than 18 * Multiple stones * Solitary kidney * Horseshoe kidney * On immunosuppressant therapy * On digoxin * Uncontrolled hypertension (Systolic blood pressure \> 170, diastolic blood pressure \> 110) * History of ureteral surgery or previous endoscopic procedure * Allergy to mirabegron * Current calcium antagonist or corticosteroid or tamsulosin usage * Patients already taking a beta-adrenergic agonist medication * Renal insufficiency \[Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) less than 60\] * Patients with Childs B and C liver failure * Signs of infection i. Temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius ii. Urinalysis with any of the following positive: 1. Positive nitrites 2. White blood cell count greater than 15/hpf (high powered field) 3. Positive urine culture \[defined as a single isolated bacterial species population of greater than 100,000 Colony Forming Units (CFU)\] * Patients with chronic pain already undergoing treatment with narcotic medications * Pregnant women and nursing mothers * Prisoners * No working phone number

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spontaneous Stone Passage Using Fisher's Exact Test30 daysThe primary outcome was stone passage rate at 30-days defined by either imaging (CT or Renal Ultrasound/KUB) or identification of stone using a straining device.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Pain Levels Between Treatment Groups Using the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale2 monthsPain measures between treatment groups will be measured daily for each patient by using the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale. The Questionnaire will be observed in patients who require surgical intervention, and will be observed during study visit. A general linear model will be used to compare Wong-Baker pain scores between the treated and placebo groups. The model will also be used to explore associations between pain scores and demographic or clinical characteristics adjusting for treatment group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

33 met inclusion criteria and were randomized to treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1 - Active
Mirabegron 50 mg orally once every 24 hours starting immediately Mirabegron: Randomized 1:1 ratio using a randomized block design, stratified by stone size (≤5 mm versus \>5 mm) and location (upper versus lower ureter). The randomization will be implemented through a database with software designed by the Director of Research Informatics at the Baylor College of Medicine's Dan Duncan Institute of Clinical and Translational Research. It will be a HIPPA-compliant secure database accessible via internet.
17
Arm 2 - Placebo
Placebo orally once every 24 hours starting immediately Placebo: Randomized 1:1 ratio using a randomized block design, stratified by stone size (≤5 mm versus \>5 mm) and location (upper versus lower ureter). The randomization will be implemented through a database with software designed by the Director of Research Informatics at the Baylor College of Medicine's Dan Duncan Institute of Clinical and Translational Research. It will be a HIPPA-compliant secure database accessible via internet.
16
Total33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1 - ActiveArm 2 - PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
40.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
40.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.1
BMP Calcium1.1 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1.2 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1.15 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
BMP Creatinine1 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
.9 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
0.95 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
BMP Potassium4 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
3.8 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
3.9 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
CBC Hgb10.7 grams/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
11.1 grams/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
10.9 grams/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
CBC Platelets15.1 10^10 platelets per liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
13.6 10^10 platelets per liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
14.35 10^10 platelets per liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
CBC WBC10.7 10^9 cells/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
11.1 10^9 cells/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
10.9 10^9 cells/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Gender
Female
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Gender
Male
14 Participants10 Participants24 Participants
Previous Stone
No
11 count of participants5 count of participants8 count of participants
Previous Stone
Yes
6 count of participants11 count of participants8.5 count of participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 Participants16 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants10 Participants24 Participants
Stone Location
Lower
14 Participants5 Participants19 Participants
Stone Location
Upper
3 Participants11 Participants14 Participants
Stone Size5.5 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
5.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
5.45 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
UA RBC20 RBC/HPF
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
19 RBC/HPF
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
19.5 RBC/HPF
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Spontaneous Stone Passage Using Fisher's Exact Test

The primary outcome was stone passage rate at 30-days defined by either imaging (CT or Renal Ultrasound/KUB) or identification of stone using a straining device.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1 - ActiveSpontaneous Stone Passage Using Fisher's Exact Test8 Participants
Arm 2 - PlaceboSpontaneous Stone Passage Using Fisher's Exact Test5 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Pain Levels Between Treatment Groups Using the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale

Pain measures between treatment groups will be measured daily for each patient by using the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale. The Questionnaire will be observed in patients who require surgical intervention, and will be observed during study visit. A general linear model will be used to compare Wong-Baker pain scores between the treated and placebo groups. The model will also be used to explore associations between pain scores and demographic or clinical characteristics adjusting for treatment group.

Time frame: 2 months

Population: Comparisons between arms were calculated with ttest, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher's exact test. Regression assessed odds of stone passageby 30 day visit by treatment arm. Time-to-stone pass was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test,Cox proportional hazards regression. Patients who didn't pass stone were censored at last follow-up date. Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale has zero to ten range. Zero represents no pain and ten represents worst.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm 1 - ActiveComparison of Pain Levels Between Treatment Groups Using the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale0.21 units on a scale
Arm 2 - PlaceboComparison of Pain Levels Between Treatment Groups Using the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale0.19 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026