Skip to content

Comparison of Tacrolimus 0.1% and Clobetasol 0.05% in the Management of Symptomatic Oral Lichen Planus

Comparison of Tacrolimus 0.1% and Clobetasol 0.05% in the Management of Symptomatic Oral Lichen Planus- A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial in Sri Lanka

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02744378
Enrollment
68
Registered
2016-04-20
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Lichen Planus

Brief summary

This clinical study is carried out to assess the efficacy of Tacrolimus and Clobetasol in symptomatic Oral Lichen Planus.

Interventions

This group was randomly allocated to receive topical Tacrolimus 0.1% for 3 consecutive weeks

DRUGClobetasol 0.05%

This group was randomly allocated to receive topical Clobetasol 0.05% for 3 consecutive weeks

Sponsors

University of Peradeniya
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically and Histologically proven Oral Lichen Planus * Symptomatic

Exclusion criteria

* topical/ systemic medication for OLP in the previous three months * contraindication for medications use such as a history of allergy to either corticosteroids/ tacrolimus * immunosuppression, or pregnant / lactating females * lichenoid reactions either drug induced or due to dental amalgam * diabetes mellitus and on oral hypoglycemic drugs * systemic involvement such as concurrent skin/genital lesions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The intensity of PainThree weeks after the application of drugsThe intensity of pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) - The patients were asked to score their intensity of pain using a VAS where the pain scores ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain) Four VAS was recorded one for spicy food and the other one for without spicy food for right side and left sides separately. The mean VAS was calculated for each side and the severity of pain was evaluated according to the following scales: Scale 0: no pain: VAS=0, Scale 1: mild pain: 0\< VAS≤3.5, Scale 2: moderate pain: 3.5 \<VAS≤7, Scale 3: severe pain: 7\< VAS≤10.
The clinical responseThree weeks after the application of drugsThe clinical response of the lesion was scored according to the grading system formulated by Thongprasom et al.,in 1992 for the mucosal lesions: Score 5 = white striae with erosive area more than 1 cm, Score 4 = white striae with erosive area less than 1 cm, Score 3 = white striae with atrophic area more than 1 cm, Score 2 = white striae with atrophic area less than 1 cm, Score 1 =mild white striae, no erythematous area Score 0 = no lesion, normal mucosa. This scorings were performed for both right and left sides separately.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026